村镇居民生活模式模拟在地震死亡估计中的应用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.01.029

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 163-168.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.01.029

村镇居民生活模式模拟在地震死亡估计中的应用

籍裴希^1,2,3, 孟耀斌^1,2,3 副教授, 叶琬^1,2,3

1 北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京 100875
2 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875
3 北京师范大学减灾与应急管理研究院,北京 100875

收稿日期:2016-10-11 修回日期:2016-12-01 发布日期:2020-11-23
作者简介:籍裴希 (1991—),女,北京人,硕士,研究方向为巨灾风险评估。E-mail:jipeixi@mail.bnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAJ24B04)。

Modeling living pattern of China village and township residents and its application in earthquake fatality estimation

JI Peixi^1,2,3, MENG Yaobin^1,2,3, YE Wan^1,2,3

1 Key Laboratory of Environment Change and National Disaster of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Resources Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
3 Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2016-10-11 Revised:2016-12-01 Published:2020-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 突发公共安全事件中的人员伤亡取决于危害因素与人群的时空分布的重合程度,建立健全的居民生活模式参数模型库可为地震等突发性公共安全风险防范和应急管理提供依据。报告了在中国较大范围开展的村镇居民生活模式参数问卷调查(HAPRRES)结果,包括生活模式参数、优化建模方法和仿真方法等。着重分析了种植业者群体的生活模式参数及其模型,发现区分不同的日工作安排(以日工作段数为参数)对活动参数分别建模,并且模型稳健性较好。利用模型库仿真再现得到人群分布,拟合出我国地震中毁坏建筑物内处于睡眠或清醒状态居民的不同死亡率,证实不同空间和活动状态的居民的伤亡概率有显著差异。

关键词: 村镇居民, 公共安全风险, 生活模式, 时间-活动参数, 地震, 死亡人口

Abstract: Human fatality or injury in a public safety incident depends on human exposure, i.e., the extent tempo-spatial distribution of the human and that of the hazard overlap to. Building models for human living pattern will give a scientific base for the prevention of public safety risk and emergency management thereof. This paper reports the China Human Activity Pattern of Rural Residents Survey (HAPRRES) conducted nationwide, including the surveyed activity time parameters, the method to model them, and the simulation technique to represent the population tempo-spatial distribution thereby. For crop farmers, the daily working schedule, indicated by the daily number of work spells, should be determined firstly, and other parameters, pertaining to each working schedule, should be modeled separately. The models so built are found to be relevant and robust. Using the simulated human tempo-spatial distribution, this paper fits a model to fatality data in China earthquakes and reveals that the fatal probability for the people in sleep and the people who are awake differ considerably in death rate, which confirms the significance of differentiating the conscious states of people.

Key words: rural resident, public safety risk, human living pattern, time activity parameter, earthquake, fatality

中图分类号:

X915.5

籍裴希, 孟耀斌, 叶琬. 村镇居民生活模式模拟在地震死亡估计中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 163-168.

JI Peixi, MENG Yaobin, YE Wan. Modeling living pattern of China village and township residents and its application in earthquake fatality estimation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(1): 163-168.

参考文献

[1] 张培震,邓起东,张竹琪,等. 中国大陆的活动断裂、地震灾害及其动力过程[J].中国科学:地球科学,2013,43(10):1 607-1 620.
ZHANG Peizhen, DENG Qidong, ZHANG Zhuqi, et al. Active faults, earthquake hazards and associated geodynamic processes in continental China[J].Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2013,43(10): 1 607-1 620.
[2] ALLEN T I, MARANO K D, EARLE P S, et al. PAGER-CAT:a composite earthquake catalog for calibrating global fatality models[J]. Seismological Research Letters,2009,80(1): 57-62.
[3] YAMAZAKI Fumio, NISHIMURA Akiyoshi,UENO Yasuhiro. Estimation of human casualties due to urban earthquakes[C]. Proceedings of the 11^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,1996:CD-ROM.
[4] KIRCHER C A, WHITMAN R V, HOLMES W T. HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods[J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2006, 7:45-59.
[5] SCAWTHORN C. Human casualties in earthquakes [M]. Berlin :Springer ,2011: 51-63.
[6] 尹之潜. 地震灾害损失预测研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,1991,11(4): 87-96.
YIN Zhiqian. A study for predicting earthquake disaster loss [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,1991,11(4): 87-96.
[7] 谭利章. 汶川地震重灾区农村灾后恢复重建研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2010.
TAN Lizhang. A study on restoration and reconstruction after rural earthquake of stricken areas by earthquake[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2010.
[8] 方创琳,吴丰林,李茂勋. 汶川地震灾区人口与居民点配置适宜性研究[J]. 城市与区域规划研究,2010,3(1): 63-78.
FANG Chuanglin, WU Fenglin, LI Maoxun. Research on the allocation suitability of population and settlements in Wenchuan earthquake area[J]. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning,2010,3(1): 63-78.
[9] KLEPEIS N E, NELSON W C, OTT W R, et al. The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants[J]. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology,2001,11(3): 231-252.
[10] SCHWEIZER C, EDWARDS R D, BAYEROGLESBY L, et al. Indoor time-microenvironment-activity patterns in seven regions of Europe[J]. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology,2007,17(2): 170-181.
[11] YANG W, LEE K, YOON C, et al. Determinants of residential indoor and transportation activity times in Korea[J]. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 2011,21(3): 310-316.
[12] 籍裴希,孟耀斌,逯超,等. 村镇居民交通时间模拟及其在灾害风险评估中的应用[J]. 北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2015,51(S1): 145-151.
JI Peixi, MENG Yaobin, LU Chao, et al. Travel time modeling of rural residents and application in disaster risk assessment [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University:Natural Science, 2015,51(S):145-151.
[13] 孟耀斌,籍裴希,逯超.一种生活模式的暴露建模方法及其在风险评估中的应用:中国,CN104636547A[P].2015-05-20.
MENG Yaobin, JI Peixi, LU Chao. An exposure modeling method for life patterns and its application in risk assessment: China, CN104636547A[P].2015-05-20.
[14] MCCURDY T, GRAHAM S E. Using human activity data in exposure models: analysis of discriminating factors[J]. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology,2003,13(4): 294-317.
[15] 中国地震局震灾应急救援司.2001—2005年中国大陆地震灾害损失评估汇编[M]. 北京: 地震出版社,2010:217-225.
China Earthquake Administration Earthquake Emergency Response and Rescue Department. Compilation of earthquake disaster loss assessment in mainland China from 2001 to 2005[M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press,2010:217-225.
[16] 崔建文,任增云,赵永庆,等. 大姚6·2级地震的强地震动观测研究[J]. 地震研究,2004,27(2): 133-139.
CUI Jianwen, REN Zengyun, ZHAO Yongqing, et al. Strong motion observation of aftershocks of M6·2 Dayao earthquake[J]. Journal of Seismological Research,2004,27(2):133-139.
[17] 尹之潜,地震灾害及损失预测方法[M]. 北京: 地震出版社,1995:5-117.
YIN Zhiqian. Earthquake disaster and loss prediction methods[M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press,1995:15-117.

村镇居民生活模式模拟在地震死亡估计中的应用

Modeling living pattern of China village and township residents and its application in earthquake fatality estimation

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	白春, 王来贵, 刘书贤, 路沙沙, 聂伟. 煤矿采动对RC框架结构抗震性能影响试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 174-183.
[2]	刘大山, 陈晓春, 多英全, 师立晨. 化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.
[3]	韩林, 赵旭东, 陈志龙, 龚华栋. 地震灾害下城市供水网络韧性评估及优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 135-142.
[4]	李岩峰, 尹家骁, 刘朝峰, 王威, 于小晨, 李子芃. 基于投影寻踪聚类的供水管网地震韧性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 152-157.
[5]	宋英华, 吴昊, 刘丹, 王喆. 基于D-S证据理论的地震应急救援群决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 163-168.
[6]	李宇, 陈明, 赵国辉. 脉冲型近场地震下HDR隔震简支梁桥参数研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 141-148.
[7]	林勇, 肖骅, 张立, 漆磊. 震灾应急物资分配-运输优化模型及算法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 171-178.
[8]	石磊, 帅健, 许葵, 杨文. 地基沉降及动水压对储罐屈曲强度的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 116-121.
[9]	张东妮, 孟耀斌, 马海关, 伍甘霖, 叶琬. 地震NaTech中时间因素对化学品安全风险的影响^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 183-188.
[10]	李京生, 赵林, 王阳, 孟亮. CRES的危害因素识别方法:以EETD为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 106-111.
[11]	谢忠球, 江莲子, 孙广臣, 邓飞秀. 多向地震作用下软弱围岩桥隧搭接段动力响应试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 87-91.
[12]	刘阳, 向波, 张建经, 闫孔明, 廖蔚茗. 公路边坡地震失稳规模模糊综合统计评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 169-174.
[13]	毛志勇, 黄春娟, 路世昌. 基于PSO-SVM的砂土地震液化预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 25-30.
[14]	李雪红, 李文琳, 顾以明, 王蕊, 徐秀丽. 新型耗能防落梁装置研发及其效应研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 139-144.
[15]	周子龙, 刘富, 王海泉, 芮艺超. 地震作用下采空区群围岩动力响应特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 110-115.