基于眼动和绩效分析的管制员情境意识测量

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.07.012

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 65-70.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.07.012

基于眼动和绩效分析的管制员情境意识测量

靳慧斌副研究员, 刘亚威, 朱国蕾

中国民航大学飞行技术学院,天津 300300

收稿日期:2017-03-30 修回日期:2017-06-02 发布日期:2020-11-26
作者简介:靳慧斌 (1976—),男,河北石家庄人,博士,副研究员,主要从事安全人机交互研究。E-mail:airhf207@163.com。
基金资助:
中国民航局安全能力专项资金项目(TMSA-2017-246-1/2);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(3122014B007)。

Measuring situation awareness of tower controllers based on eye movement and performance analysis

JIN Huibin, LIU Yawei, ZHU Guolei

Flight Technology College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2017-03-30 Revised:2017-06-02 Published:2020-11-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 情境意识(SA)是影响管制员决策和操作绩效的重要因素。为探究有效测量管制员SA水平的客观指标,搭建模拟塔台管制员眼动试验平台,设计并完成3组不同任务难度的试验。利用最近邻算法(NNI)量化识别被试眼动注视特征,并分析不同注视特征管制员的SA和操作绩效。研究结果表明:随着任务难度的增加,被试的SA水平均呈下降趋势;注视模式呈离散型分布的被试有更高的SA水平和操作绩效;眼动分析中的NNI注视指数是未来实时人因工程中测量SA水平的潜力指标。

关键词: 管制员(ATC), 情境意识(SA), 最近邻指数(NNI), 注视特征, 绩效分析

Abstract: SA is an important factor influencing the decision-making and operational performance of ATC. In order to explore the objective and effective indicators of the SA of the controllers, an eye-tracking experiment platform to simulate the tower control was built. Three group experiments of varying task difficulty based on the difference of flight number were designed and carried out. NNI algorithm was utilized to quantify subjects' eye-tracking fixation mode. The differences in SA and operational performance between controllers of different NNI fixation features were analyzed comparatively. Results reveal that there is a negative correlation between the SA of the subjects and task difficulty, that the subjects, whose NNI fixation indexes have a discrete distribution, have higher levels of SA and better operational performance, and that the NNI fixation index in the eye movement analysis is a potential indicator of SA in future real-time human factors engineering.

Key words: air traffic controller (ATC), situation awareness (SA), nearest neighbor index (NNI), fixation mode, performance analysis

中图分类号:

X949

靳慧斌, 刘亚威, 朱国蕾. 基于眼动和绩效分析的管制员情境意识测量[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(7): 65-70.

JIN Huibin, LIU Yawei, ZHU Guolei. Measuring situation awareness of tower controllers based on eye movement and performance analysis[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(7): 65-70.

参考文献

[1] 刘双, 完颜笑如, 庄达民,等. 基于注意资源分配的情境意识模型[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2014, 40(8):1 066-1 072.
LIU Shuang, WANYAN Xiaoru, ZHUANG Damin, et al. Situational awareness model based on attention allocation[J]. Journal of Beihang University, 2014, 40(8):1 066-1 072.
[2] 李福海, 谢孜楠. 我国民机进近着陆阶段飞行事故及事故征候规律分析与预防措施研究[J]. 中国民航飞行学院学报, 2008,19(4):3-7.
LI Fuhai, XIE Zinan. Analysis of flight accident in the stage of approach for civil aviation[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2008,19(4): 3-7.
[3] ENDSLEY M R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995, 37(1):32-64.
[4] JENSEN R S. Pilot judgment: training and evaluation[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1982, 24(1):61-73.
[5] 闫少华. 基于信息加工模型的管制员差错分类与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(8):121-125.
YAN Shaohua. Classification and analysis of air traffic controllers' errors based on information processing model[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(8):121-125.
[6] JONES D G, ENDSLEY M R. Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation[J]. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine, 1996, 67(6):507-512.
[7] ENDSLEY M R. A taxonomy of situation awareness errors[J]. Human Factors in Aviation Operations, 1995, 3(2):287-292.
[8] ENDSLEY M R. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1995, 37(1):65-84.
[9] SALMON P, STANTON N, WALKER G, et al. Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for c4i environments. Applied Ergonomics, 2006, 38(1), 225-238.
[10] SALMON P M, STANTON N A, WALKER G H, et al. Measuring situation awareness in complex systems: comparison of measures study[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2009, 39(3):490-500.
[11] 杨家忠, 张侃. 情境意识的理论模型、测量及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(6):842-850.
YANG Jiazhong, ZHANG Kan. Situation awareness: approaches, measures and applications[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2004, 12(6):842-850.
[12] LIVERSEDGE S P, FINDLAY J M. Saccadic eye movements and cognition[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000, 4(1):6-14.
[13] ARTHUR F Kramer, JASON S McCarley. Oculomotor behaviour as a reflection of attention and memory processes: neural mechanisms and applications to human factors[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2003, 4(1):21-55.
[14] 邓铸. 眼动心理学的理论、技术及应用研究[J]. 南京师大学报:社会科学版, 2005(1):90-95.
DENG Zhu. Theories, techniques and applied researches about eye-movement psychology[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University:Social Science, 2005(1):90-95.
[15] KOEN van de Merwe, HENK van Dijk, ROLF Zon. Eye movements as an indicator of situation awareness in a flight simulator experiment[J]. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2012, 22(1):78-95.
[16] 刘志方, 苏衡. 航空环境中情境意识的个体差异和任务难度差异检测:眼动测量技术的优势[J]. 应用心理学, 2016, 22(1):12-25.
LIU Zhifang, SU Heng. Exploring the individual and task difficulty difference of situation awareness in aviation working environment: the advantages of eye tracking method[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 22(1):12-25.
[17] HAULAND G. Measuring individual and team situation awareness during planning tasks in training of en route air traffic control[J]. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2008, 18(3):290-304.
[18] NOCERA F D, TERENZI M, CAMILLI M. Developments in human factors in transportation, design, and evaluation[M]. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Shaker Publishing, 2006:295-303.
[19] CLARK P J, EVANS F C. On some aspects of spatial pattern in biological populations[J]. Science, 1955, 121(3142):397-398.
[20] NOCERA F D, CAMILLI M, TERENZI M. A random glance at the flight deck: pilots' scanning strategies and the real-time assessment of mental workload[J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineering & Decision Making, 2007, 1(3):271-285.
[21] 靳慧斌, 刘文辉, 陈健. 情境意识及注视转移方式对塔台管制冲突的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(4):72-77.
JIN Huibin, LIU Wenhui, CHEN Jian. Effects of both situation awareness and gaze transition mode on conflict in tower control[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(4):72-77.
[22] MOACDIEH N, SARTER N. Clutter in electronic medical records: examining its performance and attentional costs using eye tracking[J].Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2015, 57(4): 591-606.
[23] MOORE K, GUGERTY L. Development of a novel measure of situation awareness: the case for eye movement analysis[C].Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2010:1 650-1 654.
[24] CAMILLI M, NACCHIA R, TERENZI M. ASTEF: a simple tool for examining fixations[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2008, 40(2):373-382.
[25] NOCERA F D, CAPOBIANCO C, MASTRANGELO S. A simple(r) tool for examining fixations[J]. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2016, 9(4):1-6.
[26] 靳慧斌, 刘亚威, 刘文辉,等. 基于NNI注视指数的塔台管制员情境意识研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(31):101-105.
JIN Huibin, LIU Yawei, LIU Wenhui, et al. Study of tower controllers' situation awareness based on NNI fixation index[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2016, 16(31):101-105.
[27] 刘伟, 袁修干, 柳忠起,等. 航空工效中情境觉知的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(12):22-25.
LIU Wei, YUAN Xiugan, LIU Zhongqi, et al. Study on situation awareness in aviation ergonomics[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2004, 14(12):22-25.

基于眼动和绩效分析的管制员情境意识测量

Measuring situation awareness of tower controllers based on eye movement and performance analysis

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王永刚，陈道刚. 基于结构方程模型的管制员情境意识影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(7): 19-.
[2]	罗晓利. 1990～2003年中国民航152起小于间隔飞行事件的分类统计研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(12): 26-.