基于实车驾驶数据的互通立交匝道区行车综合风险评价

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.08.0852

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 219-226.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.08.0852

基于实车驾驶数据的互通立交匝道区行车综合风险评价

张越¹(), 张诗¹, 段伟建², 朱兴林³, 徐进³^,^**()

¹ 重庆交通大学交通运输学院, 重庆 400074
² 重庆市公安局交通管理局, 重庆 400054
³ 新疆农业大学交通与物流工程学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2025-03-14 修回日期:2025-05-18 出版日期:2025-08-28
通信作者:
^**徐进(1977—),男,吉林四平人,博士,教授,主要从事道路安全性设计、人车路协同、驾驶行为与交通安全方面的研究。E-mail: yhnl_996699@163.com。
作者简介:
张越 (2001—),女,重庆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为道路交通安全。E-mail:1337538097@qq.com。
段伟建, 高级工程师
朱兴林, 教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(52172340); 重庆市高校创新研究群体项目(CXQT21022)

Comprehensive risk evaluation of interchange ramp area traffic based on real vehicle driving data

ZHANG Yue¹(), ZHANG Shi¹, DUAN Weijian², ZHU Xinglin³, XU Jin³^,^**()

¹ College of Traffic& Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
² Traffic Management Bureau, Chongqing Municipal Public Security Bureau, Chongqing 400054, China
³ College of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi Xinjiang 830052, China

Received:2025-03-14 Revised:2025-05-18 Published:2025-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为评价互通立交匝道区行车综合风险,选取重庆市一互通立交群开展以右转定向式匝道、左转半定向式匝道和小半径环圈式匝道的实车驾驶试验,采用PhysioLAB生理检测仪和Speedbox测速仪分别收集驾驶人经过匝道区的心电数据和车辆行驶状态数据。分析3种典型形式匝道的心理负荷和车辆运行风险,采取改进熵权逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)法构建行车综合风险模型并进行评价。结果表明:驾驶员的心率增长率(HRI)变化呈现出4种模式:凸曲线、连续增加、持续减少、凹曲线。HRI在右转定向式匝道区先降再升,在左转半定向式匝道区的分、合流点前后先升再降,在小半径环圈式匝道区的分、合流点波动较大。车辆运行风险匝道段最大,且匝道半径越小,车辆运行风险越大。车辆运行风险大小为:小半径环圈式匝道大于左转半定向式匝道大于右转定向式匝道。行车综合风险在匝道段最高且分布范围大,在分、合流段分布集中且在分流点后不远处出现最大值。

关键词: 实车驾驶数据, 互通立交, 匝道区, 综合风险评价, 心理负荷, 车辆运行风险

Abstract:

In order to evaluate comprehensive driving risk in interchange ramp areas, a real-vehicle test was conducted on Chongqing interchange groups, focusing on three typical ramps: right-turn directional, left-turn semi-directional, and small-radius loop ramps. Drivers' electrocardiographic data and vehicle operation status were collected by PhysioLAB and Speedbox, respectively, when passing through ramps. Psychological load and vehicle operation risks of the three ramps were analyzed, and an improved entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)method was used to construct and evaluate a comprehensive driving risk model. Results show four HRI change patterns: convex curve, continuous increase, continuous decrease and concave curve. Heart Rate Increase (HRI) in right-turn directional ramps first decreases, then increases, in left-turn semi-directional ramps, it first increases, then decreases near diverging/merging points, in small-radius loop ramps, it fluctuates significantly there. Vehicle operation risk is highest in ramp sections, increasing with smaller radii. The level of vehicle operation risk is small-radius loop ramp greater than left-turn semi-directional ramp, greater than right-turn directional ramp. Comprehensive driving risk peaks in ramp sections, widely distributed in split/confluence areas and peaking shortly after diversion points.

Key words: real vehicle driving data, interchange, ramp area, comprehensive risk evaluation, mental load, vehicle operational risk

中图分类号:

X951交通运输安全

张越, 张诗, 段伟建, 朱兴林, 徐进. 基于实车驾驶数据的互通立交匝道区行车综合风险评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(8): 219-226.

ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Shi, DUAN Weijian, ZHU Xinglin, XU Jin. Comprehensive risk evaluation of interchange ramp area traffic based on real vehicle driving data[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(8): 219-226.

图/表 13

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

图6

表4

表5

图7

图8

参考文献 17

[1]	中国公路学会编委会. 交通工程手册[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社,1998:43-52.
[2]	裴玉龙, 程国柱. 高速公路车速离散性与交通事故的关系及车速管理研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2004, 17(1):74-78.
	PEI Yulong, CHENG Guozhu. Research on the relationship between discrete character of speed and traffic accident and speed management of freeway[J]. Chinese Journal of Highway and Transport, 2004, 17(1): 74-78.
[3]	杨迪, 徐进, 吕能超, 等. 山地城市立交出入口驾驶员心理负荷研究[J]. 中国科技论文, 2022, 17(2):195-202.
	YANG Di, XU Jin, LYU Nengchao, et al. Mental workload of drivers at interchanges in mountain cities[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2022, 17 (2): 195-202.
[4]	郭玉洁, 郭唐仪, 吴军. 基于因子分析的城市隧道驾驶人心理负荷变化规律[J]. 交通运输研究, 2021, 7(2):91-99.
	GUO Yujie, GUO Tangyi, WU Jun. Change regularity of drivers' psychological load in urban tunnels based on factor analysis[J]. Transportation Research, 2021, 7 (2): 91-99.
[5]	徐进, 刘小明, 胡静. 基于自然驾驶数据的螺旋匝道(桥)驾驶人心理负荷分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3): 212-218.
	XU Jin, LIU Xiaoming, HU Jing. Analysis of driver mental load on helical ramps and helical bridges based on naturalistic driving data[J]. Journal of Transportation System Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20 (3): 212-218.
[6]	张雪榆, 潘存书, 林伟, 等. 山地城市多车道交织区驾驶人心理负荷研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3):25-32. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.03.004
	ZHANG Xueyu, PAN Cunshu, LIN Wei, et al. Psychological load of drivers in multi-lane interweaving areas of urban roads[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32 (3): 25-32. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.03.004
[7]	徐进, 陈正欢, 廖祺硕, 等. 基于心电数据的高速公路高密度互通立交驾驶负荷研究[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2024, 54(10):2807-2817.
	XU Jin, CHEN Zhenghuan, LIAO Qishuo, et al. Mental workload of drivers at high-density interchanges of freeways based on ECG data [J ]. Journal of Jilin University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 2024, 54(10):2807-2817.
[8]	陈正欢. 高密度互通立交驾驶人精神负荷与安全风险研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2023.
	CHEN Zhenghuan. Study on driver's mental workload and safety risks of high-density interchanges[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2023.
[9]	GE Hongcheng, HE Shijian, SUN Yuhai, et al. A method for evaluating the safety of freeway tunnel sections based on driving comfort: a naturalistic driving study[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2023, 24(8): 670-677.
[10]	BEINUM A, FARAH H, WEGMAN F, et al. Driving behaviour at motorway ramps and weaving segments based on empirical trajectory data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 92: 426-441.
[11]	徐进, 孙子秋, 冯忠祥, 等. 互通立交直连式右转匝道小客车运行特性[J]. 中国科技论文, 2022, 17(8): 844-850.
	XU Jin, SUN Ziqiu, FENG Zhongxiang, et al. Driving behavior of passenger car on direct-connected right-turn ramp of interchange[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2022, 17 (8): 844-850.
[12]	WANG Xiaofei, DING Zhenzhong, GUO Kai, et al. A simulation-based comprehensive analysis for traffic efficiency and spatial distribution of risks in short weaving area of municipal interchange[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2021: 1-14.
[13]	张晖, 刘永杰, 吴超仲, 等. 考虑行车安全事件严重程度和个体差异的驾驶行为风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7):24-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.1120
	ZHANG Hui, LIU Yongjie, WU Chaozhong, et al. A risk assessment method of driving behavior considering severity of safety-critical events and individual heterogeneity[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33 (7): 24-31. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.1120
[14]	丁瑞, 刘俊, 蒋艳, 等. 基于车辆加速度数据的互通立交匝道驾驶风险分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2021, 39(1):17-25.
	DING Rui, LIU Jun, JIANG Yan, et al. Driving risks of interchange ramps based on vehicle acceleration data[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2021, 39 (1): 17-25.
[15]	FENG Zhongxiang, YANG Miaomiao, ZHANG Weihua, et al. Effect of longitudinal slope of urban underpass tunnels on drivers' heart rate and speed: a study based on a real vehicle experiment[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81:147-153.
[16]	张敏, 陈嘉乐, 张驰, 等. 基于航拍数据的高速公路出口环圈匝道行车安全性评价方法[J]. 长安大学学报:自然科学版, 2024, 44(4):108-118.
	ZHANG Min, CHEN Jiale, ZHANG Chi, et al. Aerial photography data-based method for evaluating traffic safety of highway exit loop ramps[J]. Journal of Chang 'an University:Natural Science Edition, 2024, 44 (4): 108-118.
[17]	沈海旭. 多车道高速公路分流影响区通行能力分析[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021.
	SHEN Haixu. Analysis on traffic capacity of diversion affected area of multi-lane highway[D]. Xi 'an: Chang 'an University, 2021.

立交名称	立交型式	立交类型	匝道形式	编号	匝道限速/ (km·h^-1)	匝道车道数
白杨沟立交	变形苜蓿叶形 (对称双环式)	枢纽互通	右转定向式匝道	BY	40	2
白杨沟立交	变形苜蓿叶形 (对称双环式)	枢纽互通	左转半定向式匝道	BZ	40	2
石港立交	变形苜蓿叶形 (单环式)	一般互通	右转定向式匝道	SY	40	2
石港立交	变形苜蓿叶形 (单环式)	一般互通	左转半定向式匝道	SZ	40	2
腾龙立交	变形苜蓿叶形 (单环式)	一般互通	右转定向式匝道	TY	40	2
腾龙立交	变形苜蓿叶形 (单环式)	一般互通	左转半定向式匝道	TZ	40	2
东环立交	完全苜蓿叶形	枢纽互通	小半径环圈式匝道	DX1	30	2
东环立交	完全苜蓿叶形	枢纽互通	小半径环圈式匝道	DX2	30	2
何家梁立交	完全苜蓿叶形	一般互通	小半径环圈式匝道	HX1	30	2
何家梁立交	完全苜蓿叶形	一般互通	小半径环圈式匝道	HX2	30	2

匝道形式	平均值	15^th	85^th	最小值	最大值
右转定向式匝道	16.41	14.17	18.30	12.68	20.12
左转半定向式匝道	16.44	13.78	20.32	12.42	22.26
小半径环圈式匝道	16.66	15.13	18.64	13.90	20.04

行为指标	信息量	权重/%
速度平均值	1.049	26.91
区间车速差	0.488	12.52
纵向加速度	0.907	23.27
横向加速度	1.04	26.69
速度标准差	0.413	10.60

项	正理想解距离d⁺	负理想解距离d^-	综合风险值C	排序结果
路段单元1	0.455	0.255	0.360	199
路段单元2	0.434	0.274	0.387	153
路段单元3	0.431	0.277	0.391	142
︙	︙	︙	︙	︙
路段单元390	0.557	0.156	0.219	363
路段单元391	0.587	0.168	0.222	359

项目	聚类中心
项目	1 高风险	2 较高风险	3 低风险
驾驶综合风险值	0.426	0.408	0.34
驾驶综合风险值C	>0.416	0.375≤C≤0.416	<0.375
所占比例/%	23	29	48

基于实车驾驶数据的互通立交匝道区行车综合风险评价

Comprehensive risk evaluation of interchange ramp area traffic based on real vehicle driving data

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 17

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张雪榆, 潘存书, 林伟, 徐进. 山地城市多车道交织区驾驶人心理负荷研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 25-32.
[2]	郑展骥, 项乔君, 李涵, 顾欣. 互通立交分流区交通冲突预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 85-90.
[3]	杨璐，姚安林，张锦伟. 油气长输管道设计方案综合风险评价方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 133-.