基础隔震装置减少框架-高架筒仓地震易损性研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.11.1388

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 72-80.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.11.1388

基础隔震装置减少框架-高架筒仓地震易损性研究

罗勇哲¹(), 张家浩²^,^**(), 滕振超², 计静²

¹ 大庆石化工程有限公司,黑龙江大庆 163714
² 东北石油大学土木建筑工程学院,黑龙江大庆 163318

收稿日期:2025-06-18 修回日期:2025-08-22 出版日期:2025-11-28
通信作者:
^** 张家浩(2001—),男,广东江门人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为油气田地面建设工程、防灾减灾。E-mail:zhang_jh_nepu@163.com。
作者简介:
罗勇哲高级工程师 (1979 —),男,黑龙江五常人,本科,高级工程师,主要从事油气田工程结构设计等方面的工作。E-mail: luoyongzhe-hqc@cnpc.com.cn。
滕振超教授。
计静教授。
基金资助:
黑龙江省自然科学基金联合引导项目资助(LH2020E018); 中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2020007)

Study on reduction of seismic vulnerability of frame-elevated silo by base isolation

LUO Yongzhe¹(), ZHANG Jiahao²^,^**(), TENG Zhenchao², JI Jing²

¹ Daqing Petrochemical Engineering Co., Ltd., Daqing Heilongjiang 163714, China
² School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing Heilongjiang 163318, China

Received:2025-06-18 Revised:2025-08-22 Published:2025-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为降低高架筒仓结构地震倒塌风险,以某光伏级乙烯-醋酸乙烯共聚物(EVA)包装楼工程为研究对象,基于增量动力分析(IDA)法构建基础隔震有限元模型,并开展地震易损性分析;选取最大层间位移角作为工程需求参数(EDP)、地面峰值加速度(PGA)作为地震动强度参数(IM),对比分析原结构与隔震结构的抗震性能及失效概率。研究结果表明:在罕遇地震(PGA = 0.22 g)作用下,通过基础隔震装置降低层间位移角峰值65. 8%(X向)与51.07%(Y向),有效抑制塑性铰时序发展,消除软弱层倒塌机制;在罕遇地震作用下,隔震结构倒塌概率由3.63%显著降至0.173%;基础隔震装置相较于原结构能更好抵御小概率地震事件引起的倒塌风险。

关键词: 基础隔震装置, 框架-高架筒仓, 筒仓结构, 地震易损性, 增量动力分析(IDA), 罕遇地震

Abstract:

To mitigate the seismic collapse risks of elevated silo structures, this study adopted base isolation devices to enhance their seismic performance. A photovoltaic-grade ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) packaging project was selected as the research object. A finite element model incorporating base isolation was developed using IDA, and seismic fragility analysis was conducted. The maximum inter-story drift ratio was selected as the Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP), while Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) was adopted as the Intensity Measure (IM). The seismic performance and failure probability of the original structure and the base-isolated structure were compared and analyzed. The results demonstrate that under the rare earthquake (PGA = 0.22 g), peak inter-story drift ratios are reduced by 65.8% (X-direction) and 51.07% (Y-direction) through base isolation. Furthermore, the progression of plastic hinges is effectively suppressed, and the soft-story collapse mechanism is eliminated. Under the rare earthquake, the collapse probability of the base-isolated structure is significantly reduced from 3.63% to 0.173%. Compared to the original structure, the base-isolated structure exhibits significantly better capability in resisting collapse risks induced by low-probability seismic events. This research provides a theoretical foundation and practical guidelines for the seismic isolation design of elevated silo structures.

Key words: base isolation device, frame-supported elevated silo, silo structures, seismic vulnerability, incremental dynamic analysis (IDA), rare earthquake

中图分类号:

X924.4安全控制技术

罗勇哲, 张家浩, 滕振超, 计静. 基础隔震装置减少框架-高架筒仓地震易损性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(11): 72-80.

LUO Yongzhe, ZHANG Jiahao, TENG Zhenchao, JI Jing. Study on reduction of seismic vulnerability of frame-elevated silo by base isolation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(11): 72-80.

图/表 15

图1

表1

图2

表2

图3

表3

表4

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表5

图10

参考文献 23

[1]	KHALIL M, RUGGIERI S, UVA G. Assessment of structural behavior, vulnerability, and risk of industrial silos: state-of-the-art and recent research trends[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(6): DOI: 10.3390/app12063006.
[2]	DOGANGUN A, KARACA Z, DURMUS A, et al. Cause of damage and failures in silo structures[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2009, 23(2): 65-71. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2009)23:2(65)
[3]	MARIUS P, BENNO H, MARKUS F. Performance assessment of seismic retrofitting measures on silo structures using innovative seismic protection systems[C]. Proceedings of the 7^thEuropean Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, 2016: 5851-5867.
[4]	UCKAN E, AKBAS B, SHEN J, et al. Seismic performance of elevated steel silos during Van earthquake, October 23, 2011[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 75: 265-287. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1319-9
[5]	KANYILMAZ A, CASTIGLIONI A C. Reducing the seismic vulnerability of existing elevated silos by means of base isolation devices[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 143: 477-497. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.032
[6]	PHAN H N, PAOLACCI F, CORRITORE D, et al. Seismic vulnerability mitigation of liquefied gas tanks using concave sliding bearings[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 14: 3283-3299. doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9939-y
[7]	PAOLACCI F. On the effectiveness of two isolation systems for the seismic protection of elevated tanks[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2015, 137(3): DOI: 10.1115/PVP2014-28563.
[8]	GIANNINI R, PAOLACCI F, ANGELIS D M, et al. Shaking table tests upon a base isolated steel liquid storage tank[C]. 14^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2008: 12-17.
[9]	CASTIGLIONI C A, KANYILMAZ A, BELLOS J. Simplified numerical modeling of elevated silos for nonlinear dynamic analysis[J]. Ingegneria Sismica, 2016, 33(1/2): 5-15.
[10]	许启铿, 李建业, 刘涛, 等. 基于IDA方法的柱承式筒仓结构地震易损性分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2024, 44(3):640-648.
	XU Qikeng, LI Jianye, LIU Tao, et al. IDA-based fragility assessment of column-supported silo[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2024, 44(3): 640-648.
[11]	王录民, 张华, 卢文胜, 等. 柱承式群仓结构模型模拟地震振动台试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2010, 40(10):41-43.
	WANG Lumin, ZHANG Hua, LU Wensheng, et al. Study of shaking table tests on the model of group silos structures[J]. Building Structure, 2010, 40(10): 41-43.
[12]	李葱葱, 马东辉, 王志涛. 基于IDA的群体典型框架结构的震害预测研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(4):127-132.
	LI Congcong, MA Donghui, WANG Zhitao. Earthquake damage prediction of group typical frame structures based on IDA method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(4): 127-132.
[13]	段红杰, 周文玉, 蒋玮. 大直径筒仓结构的有限元分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2000, 30(9):30-32.
	DUAN Hongjie, ZHOU Wenyu, JIANG Wei. Finite element analysis of large diameter concrete silos[J]. Industrial Construction, 2000, 30(9): 30-32.
[14]	张强, 周德源, 邹翾, 等. 基于纤维模型RC框架结构非线性全过程分析[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2009, 35(3):6-9.
	ZHANG Qiang, ZHOU Deyuan, ZOU Xuan, et al. Full-range nonlinear analysis based on fiber model of RC frame structures[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2009, 35(3): 6-9.
[15]	张帅枫. 不同工况下钢板仓模型地震响应机理研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州航空工业管理学院, 2023.
	ZHANG Shuaifeng. Study on seismic response mechanism of steel silo model under different working conditions[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, 2023.
[16]	GB 50077—2017, 钢筋混凝土筒仓设计标准[S].
	GB50077-2017, Standard for design of reinforced concrete silos[S].
[17]	GB 50009—2012, 建筑结构荷载规范[S].
	GB50009-2012, Load code for the design of building structures[S].
[18]	王威, 黄小宁, 王宁, 等. 基于隔震技术的偏心结构扭转控制研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2020, 42(1):83-89.
	WANG Wei, HUANG Xiaoning, WANG Ning, et al. Research on torsion control of eccentric structure based on isolation technology[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2020, 42(1): 83-89.
[19]	蔡粮锴, 柏文, 戴君武, 等. 基础隔震结构隔震层扭转控制及影响研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2022, 42(4):200-209.
	CAI Liangkai, BAI Wen, DAI Junwu, et al. Research on torsional control and influence of isolation layer of base isolation structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2022, 42(4): 200-209.
[20]	马丽, 于剑桥, 邹爱华. 西部高烈度地区某小学综合楼隔震设计及性能研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造, 2021, 43(3):109-115.
	MA Li, YU Jianqiao, ZOU Aihua. Seismic design and performance study of the comprehensive building of a primary school in high intensity areas of Western China[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2021, 43(3): 109-115.
[21]	庞倩文, 翟永梅, 胡苇. 基于增量动力分析的建筑震害预测研究[J]. 防灾减灾学报, 2023, 39(4): 77-82.
	PANG Qianwen, ZHAI Yongmei, HU Wei. Research on building seismic damage prediction based on incremental dynamic analysis[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 2023, 39(4): 77-82.
[22]	王彬, 丁海平. 地基-基础隔震系统整体地震响应有限元分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(8):12-16,114.
	WANG Bin, DING Haiping. Finite element analysis of whole seismic response of the foundation base isolated structure[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15(8): 12-16,114.
[23]	吕西林, 苏宁粉, 周颖. 复杂高层结构基于增量动力分析法的地震易损性分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2012, 32(5):19-25.
	LYU Xilin, SU Ningfen, ZHOU Ying. IDA-based seismic fragility analysis of a complex high-rise structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2012, 32(5): 19-25.

抗震参数	设防信息
抗震设防类别	丙
抗震设防烈度/(°)	7
基本地震加速度/g	0.10
设计地震分组	第Ⅲ组
场地类别	Ⅳ
场地特征周期/s	0.90

模态	周期/s	X向参与/%	Y向参与/%	Z向参与/%
1	1.299	T_X - 55.32	T_Y - 7.861	R_Z - 0.529
2	1.205	T_X - 7.612	T_Y - 48.74	R_Z - 0.082
3	1.064	T_X - 0.452	T_Y - 0.080	R_Z - 53.06

支座类型	直径/ mm	橡胶厚度/ mm	第1形状系数	第2形状系数	竖向刚度/ (kN·m^-1)	初始刚度/ (kN·m^-1)	屈服强度/ kN	屈服后刚度/ (kN·m^-1)	等效刚度/ (kN·m^-1)
铅芯叠层橡胶支座	700	163	30	5	3 600 000	19 120	106	1 470	2 120
铅芯叠层橡胶支座	900	220	30	5	4 800 000	26 680	227	2 050	3 080
天然叠层橡胶支座	1 000	220	30	5	4 500 000	2 100	—	—	2 100

模态	周期/s	X向参与/%	Y向参与/%	Z向参与/%
1	5.998	T_X - 93.97	T_Y - 0.087	R_Z - 1.904
2	5.931	T_X - 0.093	T_Y - 96.34	R_Z - 0.005
3	4.913	T_X - 1.814	T_Y - 0.012	R_Z - 93.24

基础隔震装置减少框架-高架筒仓地震易损性研究

Study on reduction of seismic vulnerability of frame-elevated silo by base isolation

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 23

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价