中国安全科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 11-19.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2635

• 安全工程技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

建筑(群)和基础设施安全领域软件发展综述

岳清瑞1,2,3(), 施钟淇1,2, 曾滨4, 许镇3, 钟儒勉1,2   

  1. 1 深圳市城市公共安全技术研究院有限公司,广东 深圳518046
    2 城市安全风险监测预警应急管理部重点实验室,广东 深圳518046
    3 北京科技大学 城镇化与城市安全研究院,北京 100083
    4 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司,北京100082
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-12 修回日期:2022-07-11 出版日期:2022-10-19 发布日期:2023-03-28
  • 作者简介:

    岳清瑞 (1962—),男,黑龙江齐齐哈尔人,硕士,教授级高级工程师,中国工程院院士,深圳市城市公共安全技术研究院首席科学家、名誉院长,北京科技大学城镇化与城市安全研究院院长,长期从事从事工业与民用建筑诊治及碳纤维土木工程应用的理论与应用研究。E-mail:

    施钟淇,高级工程师

    曾滨,教授级高级工程师

    许镇,教授

    钟儒勉,级工程师

  • 基金资助:
    中国工程院咨询研究项目(2020-ZCQ-12)

Review on development of building (group) and infrastructure safety software

YUE Qingrui1,2,3(), SHI Zhongqi1,2, ZENG Bin4, XU Zhen3, ZHONG Rumian1,2   

  1. 1 Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Guangdong 518046, China
    2 Key Laboratory of Urban Safety Risk Monitoring and Early Warning, Ministry of Emergency Management, Shenzhen Guangdong 518046, China
    3 Research Institute of Urbanization and Urban Safety, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
    4 Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC, Beijing 100082, China
  • Received:2022-03-12 Revised:2022-07-11 Online:2022-10-19 Published:2023-03-28

摘要:

为综合分析我国建筑(群)和基础设施安全领域软件发展现状,探索未来发展方向。首先,介绍建筑(群)和基础设施安全领域软件的发展现状和趋势,系统梳理国内外广泛使用的主流商业软件;然后,介绍软件技术水平、自主知识产权水平与核心技术掌握程度、软件应用及影响,阐释发展具有自主知识产权的建筑(群)和基础设施安全领域软件存在的问题;最后,提出建筑(群)和基础设施安全领域软件发展的战略需求、目标、关键前沿技术和支撑保障。研究结果表明:我国建筑(群)和基础设施安全领域软件自主知识产权基础相对薄弱,未来应重点在信息化建模、高精度模拟和智能化设计等共性技术和工程应用方面开展深入研究。

关键词: 建筑(群), 基础设施, 安全领域, 软件发展, 自主知识产权

Abstract:

In order to comprehensively analyze development status of software in the field of building (group) and infrastructure safety in China, to explore development direction in the future, firstly, development status and trends were introduced, and current mainstream commercial software widely used in China and abroad were sorted out. Then, technical level of the software, mastery degree of core technologies, and application and influence of the software were introduced, and problems and difficulties existing in the development of such safety software with independent intellectual property rights were clarified. Finally, strategic requirements, objectives, key frontier technologies, and support guarantee policies were discussed. The results show that independent intellectual property rights for building (group) and infrastructure safety software are relatively scarce. In the future, in-depth research should be conducted on generic technologies and engineering applications such as information modeling, high-precision simulation and intelligent design.

Key words: building (group), infrastructure, safety field, software development, independent intellectual property right