中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 45-51.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.11.0324

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

交通基础设施韧性研究:缘起、发展与未来

刘兰剑1,2(), 董永强2,3   

  1. 1 长安大学 人文学院,陕西 西安 710064
    2 陕西省公众科学素质与公共政策研究中心, 陕西 西安 710064
    3 长安大学 马克思主义学院,陕西 西安 710064
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-14 修回日期:2023-08-18 出版日期:2023-11-28
  • 作者简介:

    刘兰剑 (1974—),男,陕西淳化人,博士,教授,主要从事国家科技安全、公共政策、环境治理等方面的研究。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项经费项目(300102113501); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项经费项目(300102113401)

Research on resilience of transportation infrastructure: origin development, and future

LIU Lanjian1,2(), DONG Yongqiang2,3   

  1. 1 School of Humanities, Chang'an University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710064, China
    2 Shaanxi Provincial Public Scientific Literacy and Public Policy Research Center, Xi'an Shaanxi 710064, China
    3 School of Marxism, Chang'an University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710064, China
  • Received:2023-05-14 Revised:2023-08-18 Published:2023-11-28

摘要:

为提升交通应急管理能力,从中国知网(CNKI)、Web of Science核心合集中筛选出70篇与交通基础设施韧性相关文献,从概念、影响因素、测度方法、提升措施方面梳理交通基础设施韧性的发展脉络。结果表明:交通基础设施韧性的研究视角从工程韧性发展到社会—生态韧性,再到应急管理;交通基础设施韧性的影响因素从关注自然因素到强调社会因素再到两者结合;定量测度交通基础设施韧性的方法成为焦点,且应急管理视角下网络分析法被广泛应用;交通基础设施韧性提升越来越强调综合治理。融合应急管理与交通基础设施韧性,探索交通基础设施网络多层次、多主体的韧性综合提升与治理将是未来研究的核心问题。

关键词: 交通基础设施, 韧性视角, 影响因素, 测度方法, 应急管理

Abstract:

In order to enhance the emergency management capacity of transportation, 70 articles related to the resilience of transportation infrastructure were selected from China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and the core collections of Web of Science. The development of resilience of transportation infrastructure was reviewed from the perspectives of concept, influencing factors, measurement methods, and improvement measures. The results show that the research perspective on the resilience of transportation infrastructure has evolved from engineering resilience to social-ecological resilience to emergency management. The influencing factors of resilience of transportation infrastructure have shifted from natural factors to social factors, and then to the combination of both. The quantitative methods for measuring the resilience of transportation infrastructure have become the focus and the network analysis method in the perspective of emergency management has been widely applied. The improvement of the resilience of transportation infrastructure has increasingly emphasized comprehensive governance. Integrating emergency management with the resilience of transportation infrastructure and exploring the comprehensive improvement and governance of the resilience of transportation infrastructure networks with multi-level and multi-subject will be the core issues of future research.

Key words: transport infrastructure, resilience perspective, influencing factors, measurement methods, emergency management