煤层注射成胶型抑尘剂影响因素及抑尘效果研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.03.1751

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 171-178.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.03.1751

煤层注射成胶型抑尘剂影响因素及抑尘效果研究

李懿¹^,²(), 陆伟¹^,², 李金亮¹^,²^,^**(), 陈云龙¹^,², 赵舒洁¹^,²

¹ 安徽理工大学安全科学与工程学院,安徽淮南 232001
² 安徽理工大学深部煤矿采动响应与灾害防控国家重点试验室,安徽淮南 232001

收稿日期:2023-09-02 修回日期:2023-12-17 出版日期:2024-03-28
通讯作者:
** 李金亮(1984—),男,山东寿光人,博士,副教授,主要从事矿井火灾防治理论与技术、防灭火材料、化工安全等方面的研究。E-mail:lijinliang2008@163.com。
作者简介:
李懿 (1999—),男,河南信阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为煤矿粉尘防控。 E-mail:L13269538@163.com。
陆伟,教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51974178); 安徽省高等学校科学研究项目(2022AH050804); 安徽省自然科学基金(2208085ME124)

Study on influencing factors and dust suppression effect of coal seam injection gum-forming dust suppressant

LI Yi¹^,²(), LU Wei¹^,², LI Jinliang¹^,²^,^**(), CHEN Yunlong¹^,², ZHAO Shujie¹^,²

¹ School of Safety Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
² State Key Laboratory of Deep Coal Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China

Received:2023-09-02 Revised:2023-12-17 Published:2024-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决煤层注水降抑尘技术中水分易流失,开采时注水抑尘效果较差等问题,提出一种既能增加煤层保水率又能改善煤层脆性的抑尘方法:研制出以海藻酸钠(SA)为基质的成胶型抑尘剂,并开展比表面积试验、氮气吸附试验、扫描电镜试验和产尘率试验,研究表面活性剂、黏度及注射压力对成胶型抑尘剂的影响。结果表明:表面活性剂有利于煤层润湿,但对抑尘效果影响较小;抑尘剂黏度增大有利于保水,可使保水时间由10 h提升至30 h,但会导致材料难以进入煤层内部;注射压力对于抑尘剂的抑尘效果具有较大影响,当煤层注射压力较小时,抑尘剂难以快速渗入煤的内部孔隙中,随着压力的增大,抑尘剂逐渐渗入煤孔隙中。当注射压力升至3 MPa后,抑尘效果不再随压力的增加而增加,产尘率由4%降低至2.3%,相对降幅达50%,有效降低了产尘。

关键词: 成胶型抑尘剂, 煤层注水, 抑尘效果, 产尘率, 保水率, 协同效应

Abstract:

In order to solve the problems of easy water loss and poor dust suppression effect in coal seam water injection technology, a dust suppression method which can not only increase the water retention rate of coal seam but also improve the brittleness of coal seam was proposed. A gum-forming dust suppressant based on sodium alginate (SA) was developed. The effects of surfactant, viscosity and injection pressure on the gum-forming dust suppressant were tested by means of specific surface area test, nitrogen adsorption test, scanning electron microscope test and dust production rate test. The test results show that the surfactant is beneficial to the wetting of the coal seam, but has little effect on the dust suppression. The increase of the viscosity of the dust suppressant is conducive to water retention, which can increase the water retention time from 10 h to 30 h, but it will make it difficult for the material to enter the coal seam. The injection pressure has a great influence on the dust suppression effect of the dust suppressant. When the coal seam injection pressure is small, the dust suppressant is difficult to quickly penetrate into the internal pores of the coal. With the increase of pressure, the dust suppressant gradually penetrates into the coal pores. When the injection pressure rises to 3 MPa, the dust suppression effect no longer increases with the increase of pressure, and the dust production rate is reduced from 4% to 2.3%, which is relatively decreased by 50%, effectively reducing the dust production.

Key words: gum-forming dust suppressant, coal seam water injection, dust suppression effect, dust production rate, water retention rate, synergies effect

中图分类号:

X936

李懿, 陆伟, 李金亮, 陈云龙, 赵舒洁. 煤层注射成胶型抑尘剂影响因素及抑尘效果研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(3): 171-178.

LI Yi, LU Wei, LI Jinliang, CHEN Yunlong, ZHAO Shujie. Study on influencing factors and dust suppression effect of coal seam injection gum-forming dust suppressant[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3): 171-178.

图/表 13

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表2

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 15

[1]	袁亮. 煤矿粉尘防控与职业安全健康科学构想[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(1):1-7.
	YUAN Liang. Scientific conception of coal mine dust control and occupational safety[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(1): 1-7.
[2]	袁亮. 我国煤矿安全发展战略研究[J]. 中国煤炭, 2021, 47(6):1-6.
	YUAN Liang. Study on the development strategy of coal mine safety in China[J]. China Coal, 2021, 47(6):1-6.
[3]	陈建阁, 李德文, 许江, 等. 基于光散射法无动力粉尘质量浓度检测技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(1):149-158.
	CHEN Jian'ge, LI Dewen, XU Jiang, et al. Detection technology of unpowered dust concentration based on light scattering method[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(1): 149-158.
[4]	程卫民, 周刚, 陈连军, 等. 我国煤矿粉尘防治理论与技术20年研究进展及展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(2):1-20.
	CHENG Weimin, ZHOU Gang, CHEN Lianjun, et al. Research progress and prospect of dust control theory and technology in China's coal mines in the past 20 years[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2020, 48(2):1-20.
[5]	袁亮, 薛生, 郑晓亮, 等. 煤矿井下空气质量革命技术现状与展望[J]. 工矿自动化, 2023, 49(6):32-40.
	YUAN Liang, XUE Sheng, ZHENG Xiaoliang, et al. Current situation and prospects of air quality revolution technology in coal mines[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2023, 49(6): 32-40.
[6]	秦桐, 蒋曙光, 张卫清. 煤的润湿性研究进展[J]. 煤矿安全, 2017, 48(9):163-166.
	QIN Tong, JIANG Shuguang, ZHANG Weiqing. et al. Research progress on coal wettability[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(9): 163-166.
[7]	郭敬中, 金龙哲, 杨朝霞, 等. 应用渗透棒提高煤层注水效果分析及试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5):54-59. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.009
	GUO Jingzhong, JIN Longzhe, YANG Zhaoxia, et al. Analysis and experimental study on improving water injection effect of coal seam with permeable rod[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(5): 54-59. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.009
[8]	赵璐, 张蕾, 文欣, 等. 表面活性剂复配对低阶煤煤尘润湿性的影响[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2021, 48(1):39-43.
	ZHAO Lu, ZHANG Lei, WEN Xin, et al. Study on effect of surfactant mixtures on wettability of low-rank coal dust[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2021, 48(1): 39-43.
[9]	SHI Guoqing, QI Jiaming, WANG Yanming, et al. Synergistic influence of noncationic surfactants on the wettability and function-al groups of coal[J]. Powder Technology, 2021, 385: 92-105. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.02.056
[10]	廖茂林, 江丙友, 张潇仪, 等. 煤尘粒径对表面活性剂复配溶液润湿性的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(3):96-102. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.03.1752
	LIAO Maolin, JIANG Bingyou, ZHANG Xiaoyi. et al. Study on effect of coal dust particle size on wettability of surfactant compounding solution[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(3): 96-102. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.03.1752
[11]	翁安琦, 袁树杰, 王晓楠, 等. 煤层注水降尘中表面活性剂复配应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10):90-95. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.013
	WENG Anqi, YUAN Shujie, WANG Xiaonan, et al. Study on application of surfactant compound in coal seam water injection for dust reduction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(10): 90-95. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.013
[12]	周刚, 李帅龙, 徐乙鑫, 等. 杉木锯屑基高吸水抑尘材料制备及效果分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(2):232-242.
	ZHOU Gang, LI Shuailong, XU Yixin, et al. Preparation and effect analysis of cedar sawdust-based super absorbent dust suppressant material[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2023, 51(2): 232-242.
[13]	ZHOU Gang, YAO Jianjun, WANG Qi, et al. Synthesis and properties of wettability-increasing agent with multi-layer composite network structure for coal seam water injection[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 172: 341-352. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.017
[14]	程卫民, 刘向升, 郭允相, 等. 综放工作面煤层混合式注水防尘技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2008, 36(9):38-42.
	CHENG Weimin, LIU Xiangsheng, GUO Yunxiang, et al. Dust-proof technology with combined seam water injection for fully mechanized top coal caving mining face[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2008, 36(9): 38-42.
[15]	王自亮. 煤和岩石的产尘特性及其试验室测定[J]. 工业安全与防尘, 1995, 4(7):18-19.

煤样	工业分析
煤样	水分	灰分	挥发分	固定碳
东滩煤	2.74	7.79	33.69	55.78

煤样	BET比表面积/ (m²·g^-1)	总孔体积/ (mL·g^-1)
原煤	2.683 4	0.011 3
水处理	2.643 9	0.009 3
抑尘剂处理	2.032 5	0.008 6

煤层注射成胶型抑尘剂影响因素及抑尘效果研究

Study on influencing factors and dust suppression effect of coal seam injection gum-forming dust suppressant

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 15

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	文建东, 刘烜, 李作泉, 苗在全, 王贝贝. 魏家地煤矿钻孔静压注水治理瓦斯技术[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S2): 60-64.
[2]	杨克, 王壮, 邢志祥, 周越, 蒋军成. 氩气协同超细水雾抑制甲烷爆炸试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(7): 55-61.
[3]	郭敬中, 金龙哲, 杨朝霞, 赵启峰, 蒋大峰. 应用渗透棒提高煤层注水效果分析及试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 54-59.
[4]	翁安琦, 袁树杰, 王晓楠, 马瑞峰. 煤层注水降尘中表面活性剂复配应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 90-95.
[5]	谢建林, 庞杰文, 菅洁, 李川田. 综采工作面煤层注水降尘试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(6): 151-156.
[6]	杨坚, 尹土兵, 刘科伟, 刘志祥, 陈冲. 全尾砂胶结充填体强度影响因素响应面法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(12): 103-109.
[7]	王春光. 低含量超强开采工作面瓦斯异常涌出防治技术[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 71-76.
[8]	周立军. 协作网络在跨区域灭火应急救援中的应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(12): 144-.
[9]	肖知国，王兆丰. 煤层注水防治煤与瓦斯突出机理的研究现状与进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(10): 150-.
[10]	章梦涛，宋维源，潘一山. 煤层注水预防冲击地压的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2003, 13(10): 69-.
[11]	金龙哲，蒋仲安，任宝宏，吴奎斌. 煤层注水中水分蒸发现象的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2000, 10(3): 58-.