Evaluation and empirical research on support capability of emergency resources for major disasters oriented to sustainable development

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.04.0991

Abstract

Abstract:

To address the unsustainable problems arising from significant demand gaps, inadequate support, and delayed supply of emergency resources in major disasters, and to tackle the limitation of traditional evaluation indicators that overlook social and environmental sustainability, this study was conducted. Firstly, based on the triple bottom line theory of sustainable development and literature mining method, a comprehensive evaluation index system was constructed from three dimensions: economic support capacity, social support capacity, and environmental support capacity for emergency resource support. Then, the original indicators were revised through expert evaluation to determine the final selected indicators. Finally, the grey relational analysis method was applied to construct an evaluation model for emergency resource support capacity in major disasters oriented towards sustainable development. Taking Henan Province as an example, the model was applied to verify its scientificity and effectiveness. The research shows that, when considering various factors such as economy, society, and environment, the correlation degree of social support is 0.933 90, having the strongest impact on emergency resource support capacity. In addition, indicators such as fixed assets investment in the logistics industry, the number of social organization units, the number of hospital beds in medical and health institutions, and regional GDP rank among the top, making them key influencing factors driving emergency resource support in Henan Province.

Key words: sustainable development, major disasters, emergency resource support capability, triple bottom line, grey relational analysis

CLC Number:

X913.4安全系统工程

Zhao Chenyang. Evaluation and empirical research on support capability of emergency resources for major disasters oriented to sustainable development[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(4): 220-227.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 26

[1]	习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗:在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. (2022-10-16). https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/ddesdjsxxpt/wjhb/art/2022/art_38e47fd795f3490a96a7362ed21accab.html.
[2]	张毅. 考虑需求缺口的应急物资分配机理及运作模式[J]. 中国流通经济, 2021, 35 (9): 32-42.
	Zhang Yi. Mechanism and operation mode of emergency material distribution with the consideration of demand insufficiency[J]. China Business and Market, 2021, 35(9): 32-42.
[3]	赵烜, 彭本红, 郑超予. 平战结合的应急物资供应点保障能力的评估[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2025, 55 (5): 259-272.
	Zhao Xuan, Peng Benhong, Zheng Chaoyu. Evaluation of the support capability of emergency supplies supply points combining peacetime and wartime[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2025, 55(5): 259-272.
[4]	黄国平, 雷皓翔. 基于云-TOPSIS法的应急物流供应商综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34 (2): 217-224. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.02.0581
	Huang Guoping, Lei Haoxiang. Comprehensive evaluation of emergency logistics suppliers based on cloud TOPSIS method[J]. China Safety Seience Journal, 2024, 34(2):217-224.
[5]	王付宇, 丁杰, 汪和平, 等. 灾后模糊需求情境下考虑救援公平性的应急物资调度问题模型与算法研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37 (3): 159-168.
	Wang Fuyu, Ding Jie, Wang Heping, et al. Model and algorithm for emergency supply scheduling problem considering rescue fairness under a fuzzy demand situation after a disaster[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2023, 37(3): 159-168.
[6]	伍佳妮, 刘之敬, 王莹. 期权契约机制下考虑社会捐赠的应急物资混合储备决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35 (7): 225-232. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.07.0090
	Wu Jiani, Liu Zhijing, Wang Ying. Hybrid reserve decision-making for emergency supplies considering social donations under option contract mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(7): 225-232. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.07.0090
[7]	张建军, 周一卓, 霍佳震. 多组织多阶段视角下重大疫情应急物资保障的关键问题与对策探讨[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2022(3): 13-24.
	Zhang Jianjun, Zhou Yizhuo, Huo Jiazhen. The key issues of the guarantee of emergency supplies against major epidemics and countermeasures from the perspectives of multi-organizations and multi-stages[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2022(3): 13-24.
[8]	Elkington J. Partnerships from cannibals with forks:the triple bottom line of 21st-century business[J]. Environmental Quality Management, 1998, 8(1):37-51. doi: 10.1002/tqem.v8:1
[9]	Pedroso C B, Tate W L, Silva A L D, et al. Supplier development adoption:a conceptual model for triple bottom line(TBL)outcomes[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,314:DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127886.
[10]	卢亚丽, 樊林芳. 水资源调度数字化对调水工程可持续供应链韧性的影响机制研究[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践: 1-28.[2026-02-28]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2267.N.20250605.1434.002.
	Lu Yali, Fan Linfang. Research on the impact mechanism of water resource scheduling digitalization on the resilience of sustainable supply chains in water diversion projects[J/OL]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice:1-28.[2026-02-28]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2267.N.20250605.1434.002.
[11]	刘伟华, 陈晓红, 卢春房, 等. 产业链供应链可持续发展的评价指标体系设计研究[J]. 工程管理科技前沿, 2024, 43 (2): 1-9.
	Liu Weihua, Chen Xiaohong, Lu Chunfang, et al. Research on the design of evaluation index system for sustainable development of industrial chain and supply chain[J]. Frontiers of Science and Technology of Engineering Management, 2024, 43(2): 1-9.
[12]	王妍妍. 重大突发公共卫生事件应急资源区域协同优化配置研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39 (20): 179-183.
[13]	Cao Cejun, Li Congdong, Yang Qin, et al. Multi-objective optimization model of emergency organization allocation for sustainable disaster supply chain[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(11):DOI:10.3390/su9112103.
[14]	林鹏, 杨晓辉, 郭子雪. 物流产业升级能力评价的改进TOPSIS方法及应用研究[J]. 当代经济管理, 2020, 42(11): 24-28.
	Lin Peng, Yang Xiaohui, Guo Zixue. Evaluation of upgrading capacity of logistics industry based on improved TOPSIS method[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2020, 42(11): 24-28.
[15]	王伟, 石雨欣, 宋月, 等. 暴雨-滑坡灾害链应急能力评估:以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2024, 33(4): 95-105.
	Wang Wei, Shi Yuxin, Song Yue, et al. Emergency capability assessment of the rainstorm-landslide disaster chain: taking the guangdong-hong kong-macao greater bay area as an example[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2024, 33(4): 95-105.
[16]	李林汉, 岳一飞, 田卫民. 基于PCA与Markov残差灰色模型的京津冀物流能力评价和预测[J]. 北京交通大学学报:社会科学版, 2019, 18 (2): 129-142.
	Li Linhan, Yue Yifei, Tian Weimin. Principal component analysis and markov residual grey based evaluation and prediction of logistics capabilities of beijing, tianjin and hebei[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 18(2): 129-142.
[17]	郑学召, 张心怡, 童鑫, 等. 陕西省突发公共卫生事件应急能力评价[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2025, 45 (2): 211-223.
	Zheng Xuezhao, Zhang Xinyi, Tong Xin, et al. Evaluation of emergency response capacity of public health emergencies inShaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2025, 45(2):211-223.
[18]	朱芳阳, 谭保华, 王婷婷. 生态位视角下区域物流产业竞争力评价:以“一带一路”重点省份为例[J]. 经济与管理, 2019, 33 (1): 30-35.
	Zhu Fangyang, Tan Baohua, Wang Tingting. Competitiveness evaluation of regional logistics industry from the perspective of niche[J]. Economy and Management, 2019, 33(1): 30-35.
[19]	陈恒, 祁宪超, 张妍. 我国区域应急物流反应能力对经济增长的影响效应[J]. 灾害学, 2024, 39 (3): 139-147,172.
	Chen Heng, Qi Xianchao, Zhang Yan, The impact of china's regional emergency logistics response capabiliy on econonic growth[J]. Joumal of Catastroptology, 2024, 39(3): 139-147,172.
[20]	薛阳, 郭世乐, 冯银虎. 长江经济带数字物流与物流高质量发展[J]. 华东经济管理, 2024, 38 (3): 23-34.
	Xue Yang, Guo Shile, Feng Yinhu. Coupling and coordination of digital logistics and high-quality logistics development in the Yangtze river economic belt[J]. East China Economic Management, 2024, 38(3): 23-34.
[21]	姜浩, 邓峰. 新能源汽车试点政策能否助力城市减污降碳协同增效?[J]. 经济经纬, 2025, 42 (6): 89-102.
	Jiang Hao, Deng Feng. Can the pilot policy for new energy vehicles help cities achieve synergistic effects in pollution reduction and carbon emission reduction?[J]. Economic Survey, 2025, 42(6): 89-102.
[22]	张浩然. 新能源汽车对城市空气污染的影响及异质效应[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43 (24): 180-187.
	Zhang Haoran. The influence and heterogeneous effects of new energy vehicles on urban air pollution[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(24): 180-187.
[23]	焦志伦, 李雯雯, 刘秉镰. 数字经济发展必然减少行业碳排放吗?来自物流业的新证据[J]. 南开经济研究, 2024(6):110-128.
	Jiao Zhilun, Li Wenwen, Liu Binglian. Will digital economy reduce industrial carbon emissions? new evidence from China's logistics industry[J]. Nankai Economic Studies, 2024(6): 110-128.
[24]	GB/T 2589—2020 综合能耗计算通则[S].
	GT/T 2589-2020 General rules for calculation of the comprehensive energy consumption[S].
[25]	徐明, 徐东华. 应急管理能力对突发公共卫生事件防控质量影响研究:基于31个省际面板数据分析[J]. 宏观质量研究, 2023, 11 (3): 95-104.
	Xu Ming, Xu Donghua. Research on the impact of emergency management capability on the quality of prevention and control of public health emergencies: analysis based on 31 provincial panel data[J]. Journal of Macro-Quality Research, 2023, 11(3): 95-104.
[26]	谭学瑞, 邓聚龙. 灰色关联分析:多因素统计分析新方法[J]. 统计研究, 1995(3): 46-48.

专家评价指标		专家1	专家2	专家3	专家4	专家5	专家6	专家7	专家8
应急资源经济支撑力	地区生产总值	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	×
	应急物资储备支出	×	√	√	√	×	√	√	√
	物流业固定资产投资额	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	×
	城乡居民人均可支配收入	√	√	×	×	×	×	√	×
应急资源社会支撑力	应急物流人员数量	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√
	医疗卫生机构床位数	√	√	×	√	√	×	√	√
	交通运输一般公共预算支出	×	×	√	×	×	√	×	√
应急资源环境支撑能力	新能源汽车保有量	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	×
	物流业碳排放量	√	√	√	×	√	√	×	√
	物流业绿色技术水平	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√

名称	2018年	2019年	2020年	2021年	2022年	2023年
N₀	1.000 0	1.129 4	1.227 1	1.371 3	1.437 9	1.427 1
N₁	1.000 0	1.075 7	1.086 6	1.162 9	1.165 9	1.184 2
N₂	1.000 0	0.989 6	1.499 4	0.858 2	0.883 9	0.893 3
N₃	1.000 0	1.048 0	1.224 1	1.265 7	1.404 9	1.775 8
N₄	1.000 0	1.048 3	1.071 2	1.000 0	0.9211	0.913 5
N₅	1.000 0	1.051 9	1.096 5	1.185 4	1.2362	1.277 6
N₆	1.000 0	1.092 9	1.176 3	1.239 6	1.2590	1.244 5
N₇	1.000 0	1.388 9	2.001 4	3.636 2	5.8321	2.771 4
N₈	1.000 0	0.991 5	1.022 2	1.105 9	1.1910	1.062 1
N₉	1.000 0	0.925 9	1.018 5	0.925 9	0.8704	0.944 4

差序列	2019年	2020年	2021年	2022年	2023年
\|Δ₁\|	0.053 6	0.140 5	0.208 4	0.272 0	0.242 9
\|Δ₂\|	0.139 7	0.272 3	0.513 1	0.554 1	0.533 8
\|Δ₃\|	0.081 4	0.003 1	0.105 6	0.033 0	0.348 7
\|Δ₄\|	0.081 0	0.155 9	0.371 3	0.516 8	0.513 6
\|Δ₅\|	0.077 4	0.130 7	0.185 9	0.201 8	0.149 5
\|Δ₆\|	0.036 4	0.050 9	0.131 8	0.178 9	0.182 6
\|Δ₇\|	0.259 5	0.774 3	2.264 9	4.394 1	1.344 3
\|Δ₈\|	0.137 8	0.204 9	0.265 4	0.246 9	0.365 0
\|Δ₉\|	0.203 4	0.208 6	0.445 4	0.567 6	0.482 7

关联系数	2018年	2019年	2020年	2021年	2022年	2023年
ξ₁	1.000 0	0.976 2	0.939 9	0.913 4	0.889 8	0.900 4
ξ₂	1.000 0	0.940 2	0.889 7	0.810 7	0.798 6	0.804 5
ξ₃	1.000 0	0.964 3	0.998 6	0.954 1	0.985 2	0.863 0
ξ₄	1.000 0	0.964 4	0.933 8	0.855 4	0.809 6	0.810 5
ξ₅	1.000 0	0.966 0	0.943 9	0.922 0	0.915 9	0.936 3
ξ₆	1.000 0	0.983 7	0.977 4	0.943 4	0.924 7	0.923 3
ξ₇	1.000 0	0.894 4	0.739 4	0.492 4	0.333 3	0.620 4
ξ₈	1.000 0	0.941 0	0.914 7	0.892 2	0.899 0	0.857 5
ξ₉	1.000 0	0.915 3	0.913 3	0.831 4	0.794 7	0.8199

关联度	平均值	排序	关联度均值
γ₁	0.936 61	4	0.923 81
γ₂	0.873 96	8
γ₃	0.960 87	1
γ₄	0.895 62	6	0.933 90
γ₅	0.947 33	3
γ₆	0.958 74	2
γ₇	0.679 98	9	0.825 49
γ₈	0.917 40	5
γ₉	0.879 10	7