高放废物处置地下实验室建设期风险接受准则

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.02.027

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 151-156.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.02.027

高放废物处置地下实验室建设期风险接受准则

仝跃^1,2, 黄宏伟^1,2 教授, 张东明^1,2 讲师, 陈亮³ 高级工程师, 李彦杰^1,2, 张恺锐^1,2

1 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
2 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
3 核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029

收稿日期:2016-10-17 修回日期:2016-12-29 出版日期:2017-02-28 发布日期:2020-11-22
通讯作者: 黄宏伟(1966—),男,山西芮城人,博士,教授,主要从事隧道及地下工程风险等方面研究。E-mail:huanghw@tongji.edu.cn。
作者简介:仝跃 (1992—),男,河北衡水人,硕士研究生,研究方向为地下工程安全及风险。E-mail:tongyue2014@yeah.net。

Research on risk acceptance criteria for construction of HLW geological disposal URL

TONG Yue^1,2, HUANG Hongwei^1,2, ZHANG Dongming^1,2, CHEN Liang³, LI Yanjie^1,2, ZHANG Kairui^1,2

1 Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2 Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3 Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2016-10-17 Revised:2016-12-29 Online:2017-02-28 Published:2020-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了开展高放废物(HLW)处置地下实验室(URL)建设施工阶段的安全风险管理,建立相应的风险接受准则。根据URL工程建设施工阶段不确定性因素众多、社会敏感性强等特点,考虑现有风险相关规范、标准应用的局限性,在借鉴既有相关风险接受准则的研究成果及确定方法的基础上,结合专家调研方法,从人员伤亡、经济损失、工期延误、社会影响、环境影响5个方面初步建立基于最低合理可行(ALARP)准则的风险接受准则。研究对比发现,所建各准则均可被连续量化,且相比于现有风险接受准则,部分标准更加严格,符合URL建设施工阶段安全风险管控的目标。

关键词: 高放废物(HLW)处置, 地下实验室(URL), 最低合理可行(ALARP)准则, 信心指数, 风险接受准则

Abstract: Risk acceptance criteria is the basis of risk management and decision making. However, the existing risk specifications and standards of China can't satisfy the construction of URL. The paper was aimed at establishing acceptance criteria for the construction phase of URL.Firstly, the experience and method of the existing risk acceptance criteria were considered. Then a guestionnaire survey was carried out into experts,belonging to the owners,universities, design, consulting and insurance units on the feature values of acceptance criteria. To improve the reliability, the quartile method was used to check the abnormal value of the survey data. At the same time, the confidence index, which reflects the confidence of judgment, was applied to calculating the weights of experts with the basic information on experts. Lastly, based on ALARP principle, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The tolerable and acceptable standards of the individual risk and social impact risk were given . The criteria can be quantized continuously and can satify the risk management during the construction phase of URL.

Key words: high level radioactive waste(HLW) disposal, underground research laboratory(URL), as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) principle, confidence index, risk acceptance criteria

中图分类号:

X948
TD7

仝跃, 黄宏伟, 张东明, 陈亮, 李彦杰, 张恺锐. 高放废物处置地下实验室建设期风险接受准则[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(2): 151-156.

TONG Yue , HUANG Hongwei , ZHANG Dongming , CHEN Liang , LI Yanjie , ZHANG Kairui. Research on risk acceptance criteria for construction of HLW geological disposal URL[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(2): 151-156.

参考文献

[1] International Atomic Energy Agency. Factors affecting public and political acceptance for the implementation of geological disposal[Z], 2007.
[2] 王驹. 我国高放废物深地质处置战略规划探讨[J]. 铀矿地质, 2004, 20(4):196-204, 212.
WANG Ju. Strategic program for deep geological disposal of high level radioactive waste in China[J]. Uranium Geology, 2004, 20(4): 196-204, 212.
[3] 潘自强, 钱七虎. 我国高放废物地质处置战略研究[J]. 中国核电, 2013, 6(2):194-196.
PAN Ziqiang, QIAN Qihu. The geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste strategy research in our country[J]. China Nuclear Power, 2013, 6(2):194-196.
[4] STARR C. Social benefit versus technological risk[J]. Science, 1969, 165:1 232-1 238.
[5] The Dutch Technical Advisory Committee on Water Defences (TAW). Some considerations of an acceptable level of risk in the Netherland[M]. Amsterdam: TAW, 1985: 32-76.
[6] BOTTELBERGHS P H. Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherland[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 71: 59-84.
[7] Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Risk criteria for land use planning in the vicinity of major industrial hazards[R]. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1989.
[8] Health and Safety Executive (HSE). The tolerability of risks from nuclear power stations[R]. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1988.
[9] Z-013 Rev.2.NorskStandard,Risk and emergency preparedness analysis[S]. 2001.
[10] 李典庆,唐文勇,张圣坤. 海洋工程风险接受准则研究进展[J]. 海洋工程, 2003, 21(2): 96-102.
LI Dianqing, TANG Wenyong, ZHANG Shengkun. Review of risk acceptance criteria for ocean engineering[J]. The Ocean Engineering, 2003, 21(2): 96-102.
[11] 胡群芳, 黄宏伟. 隧道及地下工程风险接受准则计算模型研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 2(1):60-64.
HU Qunfang, HUANG Hongwei. Study on the modeling of risk acceptance criteria for tunnel and underground engineering[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(1):60-64.
[12] 周杨. 长大隧道工程建设期风险接受准则研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2007.
ZHOU Yang. Risk acceptance criteria of long large tunnels in construction period[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2007.
[13] 李红英,谭跃虎. 滑坡灾害风险可接受准则计算模型研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(增2): 2 047-2 052.
LI Hongying, TAN Yuehu. Study on the computational model of risk acceptance criteria for landslide disaster[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2013, 9(S2): 2 047-2 052.
[14] 周兴波,周建平,杜效鹄,等. 我国大坝可接受风险标准研究[J]. 水力发电学报,2015, 34(1): 63-72.
ZHOU Xingbo, ZHOU Jianping, DU Xiaohu, et al. Study on risk acceptance criteria for dams in China [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Enginnering, 2015, 34(1): 63-72.
[15] 核工业北京地质研究院. 核设施退役及放射性废物治理科研项目建议书[R],2014.
Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology. Recommendation of research on the treatment of radioactive waste and retired nuclear facilities[R], 2014.
[16] 核工业北京地质研究院. 国家首座高放废物地质处置地下实验室候选场址筛选技术报告[R],2015.
Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology. Screening report of candidate sites for China first underground research laboratory of high-level radioactive waste geological disposal[R], 2015.
[17] DEGN E S, TENGBOR P, KAMPMANN J, et al. Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: international tunnelling association, working group No. 2[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19(3): 217-237.
[18] Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Reducing risks: protecting people-HSE's decision making process[R]. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2001, 21-52.
[19] RASBASH D J. Tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations: health and safety executive, published by HMSO, London, pp. 36; price: ￡4.95, ISBN 0-118839-82-9[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1988, 13(2/3): 227-229.
[20] 尚志海,刘希林. 国外可接受风险标准研究综述[J]. 世界地理研究, 2010, 19(3): 72-80.
SHANG Zhihai, LIU Xilin. Overviews on foreign acceptable risk criteria[J]. World Regional Studies, 2010, 19(3): 72-80.
[21] DAI F C, LEE C F, NGAI Y Y. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview[J]. Engineering Geology, 2002, 64(1): 65-87.
[22] 李漾,周昌玉,张伯君. 石油化工行业可接受风险水平研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2007, 7(6): 116-119.
LI Yang, ZHOU Changyu, ZHANG Bojun. Study on acceptable level of risk in petrochemical industry[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 7(6): 116-119.
[13] 杜效鹄,杨健. 我国水电站大坝溃坝生命风险标准讨论[J]. 水力发电, 2010, 36(5): 68-70,94.
DU Xiaohu, YANG Jian. Discuss on risk standard of life loss caused by hydropower dam failure in China [J]. Water Power, 2010, 36(5): 68-70,94.
[14] 赵峰,夏永旭,常海兵. 中国公路隧道运营风险接受准则研究[J]. 中外公路, 2014, 34(6): 191-197.
ZHAO Feng, XIA Yongxu, CHANG Haibing. Study on the risk acceptance criteria of the tunnel operation of China highway[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2014, 34(6): 191-197.
[25] 李燕庭. 铁路建设工程风险分级标准研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2014.
LI Yanting. Research on risk classification criteria of railway construction projects[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014.
[26] FARMER F R. Siting criteria-a new approach[C].Proceedings of the IAEA Symposium on Nuclear Siting,1967:303-329.
[27] VRIJLING J K, VAN G P. Societal risk and the concept of risk aversion[J]. Advances in Safety and Reliability, 1997,1:45-52.

高放废物处置地下实验室建设期风险接受准则

Research on risk acceptance criteria for construction of HLW geological disposal URL

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价