粉体云幕对瓦斯煤尘爆炸隔爆效果的试验研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.012

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 74-81.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.03.012

粉体云幕对瓦斯煤尘爆炸隔爆效果的试验研究

黄子超^1,2 助理研究员, 司荣军^1,2 研究员

1.中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司火灾爆炸防治研究分院,重庆 400037;
2.瓦斯灾害监控与应急技术国家重点实验室,重庆 400037

收稿日期:2019-12-14 修回日期:2020-02-13 出版日期:2020-03-28 发布日期:2021-01-26
作者简介:黄子超(1987—),男,山东莘县人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事可燃气体粉尘爆炸基础理论及防治技术与装备等方面的研究。E-mail:passion_hzc@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助(2018YFC0807900)。

Experimental study on suppression of gas and coal dust explosion by powder clouds

HUANG Zichao^1,2, SI Rongjun^1,2

1. Fire and Explosion Prevention Research Branch, China Coal Technology Engineering Group Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing 400037, China;
2. National Key Laboratory of Gas Disaster Detecting, Preventing and Emergency Controlling, Chongqing 400037, China

Received:2019-12-14 Revised:2020-02-13 Online:2020-03-28 Published:2021-01-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探索瓦斯煤尘爆炸的防治技术措施,在大尺度断面巷道开展粉体云幕的隔爆性能测试。运用直径2 m大尺度管道及其附属敞开空间,研究粉体云幕的形成过程及其动态分布特征;在此基础上,以爆炸压力、火焰速度为特征参数,在断面7.2 m²大型地下巷道内进行瓦斯煤尘爆炸及隔爆试验。研究结果表明:隔爆粉体在60 ms时可覆盖7.4 m²断面,在1 200 ms绝大部分粉体喷出,形成有效隔爆屏障;在试验条件下,粉体云幕面密度8.1 kg/m²时,爆炸火焰在13 m范围内被完全熄灭,最大爆炸压力由云幕前的0.293 MPa降低至0.126 MPa,下降了57.0%,140 m位置的爆炸压力上升时间延迟了137 ms;随粉体云浓度的增加,隔爆效果增强,粉体云幕能在短距离范围内扑灭爆炸火焰,并大幅衰减爆炸冲击波压力。

关键词: 粉体云幕, 瓦斯煤尘爆炸, 隔爆, 爆炸压力, 火焰速度

Abstract: In order to explore prevention and control measures for gas and coal dust explosion, explosion-proof performance of powder clouds is tested in roadways with large-scale sections. Firstly, an 2 m large pipe and its open space were used to study formation process and dynamic distribution characteristics of powder clouds. On this basis, with explosion pressure and flame velocity as characteristic parameters, gas and coal dust explosion and suppression experiments were conducted in a large roadway with a section of7.2 m². The results show that the powder can cover 7.4 m² section at 60 ms, and most of the powder is ejected at 1 200 ms, forming an effective explosion-proof barrier. When surface density of powder cloud reaches 8.1 kg/m², flame can be completely extinguished within 13 m, and maximum explosion pressure is reduced by 57.0% from 0.293 to 0.126 MPa while pressure rising time at 140 m is delayed by 137 ms. As power concentration increases, suppression effect of cloud curtain is enhanced, and it can extinguish flame in a short distance and greatly attenuate explosion pressure.

Key words: powder clouds, gas and coal dust explosion, explosion suppression, explosion pressure, flame propagation velocity

中图分类号:

X932

黄子超, 司荣军. 粉体云幕对瓦斯煤尘爆炸隔爆效果的试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 74-81.

HUANG Zichao, SI Rongjun. Experimental study on suppression of gas and coal dust explosion by powder clouds[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(3): 74-81.

参考文献

[1] 王连聪, 梁运涛, 罗海珠. 我国矿井热动力灾害理论研究进展与展望[J].煤炭科学技术, 2018,46(7): 1- 9.
WANG Liancong, LIANG Yuntao,LUO Haizhu. Research progress and outlook on theory of thermodynamic disaster of coal mine in China [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(7): 1-9.
[2] 王新, 李润之, 张延松. 瓦斯爆炸引起沉积煤尘爆炸传播实验研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(4): 73-77.
WANG Xin, LI Runzhi, ZHANG Yansong. Experimental study on the propagation laws of gas explosion inducing coal dust explosion [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(4): 73-77.
[3] 仇锐来, 张延松, 司荣军, 等. 点火能量对瓦斯爆炸传播影响的实验研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2011, 38(1): 6-9,12.
QIU Ruilai, ZHANG Yansong, SI Rongjun, et al. Experimental study on influence of ignition energy upon gas explosion propagation [J]. Mining Safety & Environment Protection, 2011, 38(1): 6-9,12.
[4] 刘丹, 司荣军, 李润之. 环境湿度对瓦斯爆炸特性的影响[J]. 高压物理学报, 2015, 29(4): 307-312.
LIU Dan, SI Rongjun, LI Runzhi. Ambient humidity influence on explosion characteristics of methane-air mixture [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2015, 29(4): 307-312.
[5] 司荣军. 温度压力耦合对甲烷爆炸极限影响的试验研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2014, 14(4): 32-35.
SI Rongjun. Experimental study on the explosion limits of methane under coupling effects of temperature and pressure [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2014, 14(4): 32-35.
[6] 陈东梁,孙金华,刘义,等. 甲烷/煤尘复合体系燃烧反应特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报,2008,29(7): 1 243-1 247.
CHEN Dongliang,SUN Jinhua,LIU Yi,et al.Study on combustion characteristics of methane/coal dust mixture[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics,2008,29(7): 1 243-1 247.
[7] 薛少谦, 司荣军, 张延松. 细水雾抑制瓦斯爆炸试验研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2013, 40(1): 4-7.
XUE Shaoqian, SI Rongjun, ZHANG Yansong. Experimental study on suppression of gas explosion by water mist [J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2013, 40(1): 4-7.
[8] AMROGOWICZ J, KORDYLEWSKI W. Effectiveness of dust explosion suppression by carbonates and phosphates [J]. Combustion and Flame,1991,85(3): 520-522.
[9] CHELLIAH H K,WANIGARATHNE P C,LENTATI A M,et al. Effect of sodium bicarbonate particle size on the extinction condition of non-premixed counter flow flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 134(3): 261-272.
[10] 王燕, 程义伸, 曹建亮,等.核-壳型KHCO₃/赤泥复合粉体的甲烷抑爆特性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(3): 653-658.
WANG Yan, CHENG Yishen, CAO Jianliang, et al. Suppression characteristics of KHCO₃/red-mud composite powders with core-shell structure on methane explosion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(3): 653-658.
[11] 覃欣欣,司荣军,李润之. 输送管道内低浓度瓦斯爆炸抑制试验[J]. 煤矿安全,2016, 47(1): 5-8.
QIN Xinxin, SI Rongjun, LI Runzhi. Suppression test for low concentration gas explosion in transport pipeline [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(1): 5-8.
[12] 黄子超,司荣军,薛少谦.抑爆粉剂浓度及粒度对瓦斯爆炸抑制效果的影响[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(4): 89-94.
HUANG Zichao, SI Rongjun, XUE Shaoqian. Influence of concentration and granularity of powder explosion suppressant on suppression effect of gas explosion[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(4): 89-94.
[13] MT 694—1997,煤矿用自动隔爆装置通用技术条件[S].
MT 694-1997,General technical condition of the automatic devices for explosion suppression in coal mine[S].
[14] 戴晓静. 磷酸二氢盐抑爆剂的制备与抑爆作用研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学,2013.
DAI Xiaojing. Research on dihydric phosphate salt suppressant's preparation and effects on explosion [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2013.
[15] 曹玮. 磷酸铵盐干粉抑制瓦斯爆炸的实验研究 [D].西安: 西安科技大学,2011.
CAO Wei. Experimental research on ammonium phosphate dry powder to repress gas explosion [D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2011.
[16] 薛少谦. 抑制瓦斯煤尘爆炸传播的主动喷粉抑爆技术[J]. 煤矿安全, 2013, 44(7): 66-69.
XUE Shaoqian. Active dusting explosion suppression technology for inhibiting the spread of the gas and dust explosion [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(7): 66-69.
[17] 王林元, 吕瑞琪, 邓洪波. 不同粒径镁铝合金粉尘爆炸与抑爆特性研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(1): 34-38.
WANG Linyuan,LYU Ruiqi,DENG Hongbo. Study on characteristics of explosion and explosion suppression for magnesium-aluminum alloy dust with different particle size[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(1): 34-38.

粉体云幕对瓦斯煤尘爆炸隔爆效果的试验研究

Experimental study on suppression of gas and coal dust explosion by powder clouds

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	袁必和, 张玉铎, 员亚龙, 黄楚原, 陈先锋, 陈公轻. 多孔聚丙烯复合材料的抑爆性能研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 91-96.
[2]	景国勋, 贺祥, 郭绍帅, 朱斯佳. 封闭材料对分岔管道中瓦斯爆炸特性的影响^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 64-70.
[3]	王志荣, 孙培培, 唐振华, 张锎. 密闭容器甲烷-空气混合物爆炸的尺寸效应[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 60-66.
[4]	李昂, 司俊鸿, 李雪冰. 泄爆门泄爆特性试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 51-56.
[5]	刘静, 陈先锋, 章波, 高文傲, 赵齐, 孙玮康. 甲烷体积分数对甲烷-煤粉复合火焰传播特性的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 106-112.
[6]	罗振敏, 王子瑾, 苏彬, 李逵, 石静. 多元可燃气体对CH₄爆炸及其自由基发射光谱影响试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 1-7.
[7]	覃小玲, 李晓泉. NH₄H₂PO₄对蔗糖粉尘爆炸的抑制作用试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 41-46.
[8]	景国勋, 张胜旗, 段新伟, 郭绍帅, 刘闯. 竖直管道内煤尘浓度对瓦斯爆炸特性影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(3): 15-20.
[9]	许闯, 陈先锋, 代华明, 黄楚原, 赵齐, 王玉杰. 点火位置和开口率对泄压管道内爆炸压力的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 94-100.
[10]	员亚龙, 陈先锋, 袁必和, 谭海, 刘晅亚, 黄楚原. 聚磷酸铵对糖粉火焰传播特性的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 71-76.
[11]	焦枫媛, 霍雨江, 刘金彪, 张华荣. 混合均匀性对甲烷爆炸特性影响的试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(8): 38-42.
[12]	张春燕, 陶刚, 涂善东, 张礼敬. 低压氢气-空气混合物爆炸试验研究及数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 87-92.
[13]	王玉娇, 赵江平. 谷物粉尘爆炸特性试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 77-81.
[14]	雷伟刚, 毕海普讲师, 王凯全教授. 弯管内铝粉二次爆炸及抑爆试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(11): 43-48.
[15]	何琰儒, 朱顺兵, 李明鑫, 吴倩倩, 曹元, 周征. 煤粉粒径对粉尘爆炸影响试验研究与数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 53-58.