均布与梯度应力加载路径下岩爆破坏特征试验

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.023

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 149-155.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.05.023

均布与梯度应力加载路径下岩爆破坏特征试验

夏元友¹ 教授, 刘昌昊¹, 刘夕奇¹, 吝曼卿² 副教授, 向红京³, 喻旭⁴

1.武汉理工大学土木工程与建筑学院,湖北武汉430070;
2.武汉工程大学资源与安全工程学院,湖北武汉430205;
3.中国葛洲坝集团第一工程有限公司,湖北宜昌 443000;
4.湖北商贸学院外语外事学院,湖北武汉430079

收稿日期:2020-02-20 修回日期:2020-04-17 出版日期:2020-05-28 发布日期:2021-01-28
作者简介:夏元友(1965—),男,安徽庐江人,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail:xiayy1965@whut.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家大学生创新创业训练计划项目(20191049706013);国家自然科学基金资助(51504167);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助(20110143110017);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2017-YB-022)。

Experimental study on rockburst characteristics under uniform and gradient stress loading paths

XIA Yuanyou¹, LIU Changhao¹, LIU Xiqi¹, LIN Manqing², XIANG Hongjing³, YU Xu⁴

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430070, China;
2. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430205, Chin;
3. China Gezhouba Group No. 1. Engineering Co., Ltd., Yichang Hubei 443000, China;
4. School of Foreign Languages, Hubei Business College, Wuhan Hubei 430079, China

Received:2020-02-20 Revised:2020-04-17 Online:2020-05-28 Published:2021-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究围岩切向应力集中过程中加载应力分布对岩爆特性的影响,利用自主研制的梯度与气液复合加载岩爆装置,对大尺寸类岩体模型进行均布与梯度应力加载路径下的岩爆模拟试验;从岩爆破坏现象、碎屑形态及分布特征等方面,对比分析均布与梯度应力加载下的模型岩爆特征。结果表明:均布与梯度应力加载下的岩爆破坏特性存在明显差异;均布应力加载下,模型岩爆主要形成以张拉破坏为主的片状、板状碎屑,碎屑弹射距离较近,对应的岩爆烈度小;而梯度应力加载下,模型岩爆主要形成以剪切破坏为主的块状碎屑,相对于均布应力加载,碎屑抛射距离更远,岩爆烈度更大。

关键词: 均布应力, 梯度应力, 应变型岩爆, 气液复合, 破坏特征

Abstract: In order to study influence of loading stress distribution of surrounding rocks on rockburst characteristics during tangential stress concentration process, rockburst simulation tests were conducted on large class rock-like models under uniform and gradient stress loading by using independently developed gradient and gas-liquid composite loading devices. Then, rockburst characteristics were compared and analyzed from aspects of model burst phenomenon, debris morphology and distribution features. The results show that there are obvious differences in rockburst characteristics between uniform and gradient stress loading. Under uniform stress loading, model rockburst mainly forms flaky and plate-like debris with tensile failure, and ejection distance of debris is relatively short with a smaller rockburst intensity. However, under load of gradient stress, it mainly forms massive debris with shear failure, which has a relatively greater ejection distance and intensity

Key words: uniform stress, gradient stress, strain rockburst, gas-liquid compound, failure characteristics

中图分类号:

X935

夏元友, 刘昌昊, 刘夕奇, 吝曼卿, 向红京, 喻旭. 均布与梯度应力加载路径下岩爆破坏特征试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(5): 149-155.

XIA Yuanyou, LIU Changhao, LIU Xiqi, LIN Manqing, XIANG Hongjing, YU Xu. Experimental study on rockburst characteristics under uniform and gradient stress loading paths[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(5): 149-155.

参考文献

[1] 冯夏庭, 肖亚勋, 丰光亮, 等. 岩爆孕育过程研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019,38(4): 649-673.
FENG Xiating, XIAO Yaxun, FENG Guangliang, et al. Study on the development process of rockbursts [J]. Chinese Journalof Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(4): 649-673.
[2] 江飞飞, 周辉, 刘畅, 等. 地下金属矿山岩爆研究进展及预测与防治[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(5): 956-972.
JIANG Feifei, ZHOU Hui, LIU Chang, et al. Progress, prediction and prevention of rockbursts in underground metal mines [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(5): 956-972.
[3] 邵良杉, 周玉. 基于MIV-MA-KELM模型的岩爆烈度等级预测[J].中国安全科学学报,2018, 28(2): 34-39.
SHAO Liangshan, ZHOU Yu. MIV-MA-KELM model based prediction of rockburst intensity grade [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(2): 34-39.
[4] 黄建, 夏元友, 吝曼卿. 基于改进组合赋权的岩爆多维云模型预测研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 26-32.
HUANG Jian, XIA Yuanyou, LIN Manqing. Study on prediction of rock burst by multi-dimensional cloud model based on improved combined weight [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(7): 26-32.
[5] ZHAO Tongbin, GUO Weiyao, TAN Yunliang, et al. Case studies of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions during multi-seam mining at adepth of 800 m [J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(5): 1-26.
[6] LI Tianbin, MA Chunchi, ZHU Minglei, et al. Geomechanical types and mechanical analyses of rockbursts [J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 222: 72-83.
[7] 张晓君. 高应力硬岩卸荷岩爆模式及损伤演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(12): 3 554-3 560.
ZHANG Xiaojun. Pattern and damage evolution of unloading rockburst for high-stress hard rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12): 3 554-3 560.
[8] 周德培, 洪开荣. 太平驿隧洞岩爆特征及防治措施[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1995,14(2): 171-178.
ZHOU Depei, HONG Kairong. The rockburst features of Taipingyi tunnel and the prevention methods [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1995,14(2): 171-178.
[9] 谢和平, 鞠杨, 黎立云, 等. 岩体变形破坏过程的能量机制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008,27(9): 1 729-1 740.
XIE Heping, JU Yang, LI Liyun, et al. Energy mechanism of deformation and failure of rock masses [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 27(9): 1 729-1 740.
[10] 何满潮, 苗金丽, 李德建, 等. 深部花岗岩试样岩爆过程实验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(5): 865-876.
HE Manchao, MIAO Jinli, LI Dejian, et al. Experimental study on rockburst processes of granite specimen at great depth [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(5): 865-876.
[11] GONG Weili, PENG Yanyan, WANG Hu, et al. Fracture angle analysis of rock burst faulting planes based on true-triaxial experiment[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 48(3): 1 017-1 039.
[12] HE Manchao, SOUSA L R E, MIRANDA T, et al. Rockburst laboratory tests database-application of data mining techniques[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 185: 116-130.
[13] ZHAO X G, CAI M. Influence of specimen height-to-width ratio on the strainburst characteristics of Tianhu granite under true-triaxial unloading conditions[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 52(7): 890-902.
[14] ZHAO X G, WANG J, CAI M. Influence of unloading rate on the strainburst characteristics of beishan granite undertrue-triaxial unloading conditions[J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(2):467-483.
[15] HE Manchao, ZHAO Fei, CAI M, et al. A novel experimental technique to simulate pillar burst in laboratory[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 48(5): 1-16.
[16] HE Manchao, JIA Xuena, COLI M, et al. Experimental study of rockbursts in underground quarrying of carrara marble[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2012, 52(6): 1-8.
[17] HE Manchao, MIAO Jinli, FENG Jili. Rock burst process of limestone and its acoustic emission characteristics under true-triaxial unloading conditions[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(2): 286-298.
[18] SU Guoshao, CHEN Zhiyong, JU J W, et al. Influence of temperature on the strainburst characteristics of granite under true-triaxial loading conditions[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 222: 38-52.
[19] KIDYBINSKI A. Bursting liability indices of coal[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1981,18(4): 295-304.
[20] SINGH A K, SINGH R, MAITI J, et al. Assessment of mining induced stress development over coal pillars during depillaring[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(5): 805-818.
[21] BROWN E T, HOEK E. Trends in relationships between measured in-situ, stresses and depth[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 1978, 15(4): 211-215.

均布与梯度应力加载路径下岩爆破坏特征试验

Experimental study on rockburst characteristics under uniform and gradient stress loading paths

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	肖晓春, 王磊, 吴迪, 丁鑫, 樊玉峰, 赵宝友. 瓦斯吸附作用下煤岩力学行为及声-电荷反演[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 82-87.
[2]	路胜卓, 陈卫东, 王伟, 张丰超, 马敬鑫, 师亚琴. 爆炸冲击下钢制浮顶储罐破坏的数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(5): 64-69.
[3]	邢佶慧，沈世钊. 单层柱面网壳结构强震作用下抗震性能研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(11): 8-.