配对进近侧向位置误差QAR参数关联性分析*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.007

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 47-52.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.007

配对进近侧向位置误差QAR参数关联性分析^*

张兆宁教授, 陈子辰, 卢飞^** 副教授

中国民航大学空中交通管理学院,天津 300300

收稿日期:2021-05-29 修回日期:2021-07-10 出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2022-02-28
通讯作者: ** 卢飞 (1984—),男 ,山东新泰人,硕士,副教授,主要从事空中交通规划与管理方面的研究。E-mail:lufei315@126.com。
作者简介:张兆宁 (1964—),男,河北滦南人,博士,教授,主要从事空中交通规划与管理方面的研究。E-mail:zzhaoning@263.net。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年基金资助(71701202);中央高校基本科研业务费(3122014D037)。

Correlation analysis of QAR parameters for paired approach lateral position error

ZHANG Zhaoning, CHEN Zichen, LU Fei

School of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2021-05-29 Revised:2021-07-10 Online:2021-08-28 Published:2022-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究配对飞机进近阶段飞行员操作和环境因素与侧向位置误差间的关联性,结合快速存取记录器(QAR)数据,基于飞机侧向位置修正过程,识别影响侧向位置误差的QAR参数;建立模糊关联模型,模型中运用模糊C均值(FCM)聚类方法将QAR参数的样本值聚类,得到每个参数的隶属度矩阵;结合Apriori算法,挖掘参数间及参数与侧向位置误差间的关联规则;基于关联规则量化其中的关联性,使用A320-200的真实样本数据进行关联性分析。结果表明:识别出的QAR参数在指定30%支持度下都与侧向位置误差相关;飞机的仰角、坡度、方向舵位置以及风向对侧向位置误差影响较大。

关键词: 配对进近, 侧向位置误差, 快速存取记录器(QAR)数据, 关联性分析, 模糊关联模型

Abstract: In order to study correlation between pilot operation and environmental factors and lateral position error during aircraft approach,QAR parameters that affect lateral position error based on aircraft lateral position correction process and QAR data were identified. Fuzzy correlation model was established, in which fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering method was used to cluster sample values of QAR parameters, and membership matrix of each parameter was obtained, combined with Apriori algorithm, association rules among parameters and between parameters and lateral position errors were mined. Correlation was quantified based on association rules, and real sample data of A320-200 was used for correlation analysis. The results show that identified QAR parameters are all related to lateral position error under specified 30% support degree. Elevation angle, slope, rudder position and wind direction have great influence on lateral position error.

Key words: paired approach, lateral position error, quick access recorder(QAR) data, correlation analysis, fuzzy association model

中图分类号:

X949

张兆宁, 陈子辰, 卢飞. 配对进近侧向位置误差QAR参数关联性分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 47-52.

ZHANG Zhaoning, CHEN Zichen, LU Fei. Correlation analysis of QAR parameters for paired approach lateral position error[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 47-52.

参考文献

[1] MADDEN M M. Kinematic modeling of separation compression for paired approaches to closely-spaced parallel runways[C]. AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, & Operations Conference,2006:DOI:10.2514/6. 2 014-3 150.
[2] GUERREIRO N, NEITZKE K. Simulated wake characteristics data for closely spaced parallel runway operations analysis[C]. Aiaa Aviation Technology, Integration, & Operations, 2013:DOI: 10.2514/6. 2 012-5 642.
[3] GEYER M, SOARES M, HOFF A. RNAV (GPS) total system error models for use in wake encounter risk analysis of candidate CSPR pairs for inclusion in FAA order 7110.308[Z]. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.), 2013.
[4] TORRESPOMALES W, MADDEN M M, BUTLER R W, et al. Analysis and simulation of the simplified aircraft-based paired approach concept with the ALAS alerting algorithm in conjunction with echelon and offset strategies[R]. NASA/TM-2014-218151, 2014.
[5] PRIESS S. Analysis of an ADS-B in method for calculating the interval management paired approach collision safety limit[C]. 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2017:DOI:10.2514/6. 2 014-3 150.
[6] 卢飞, 张兆宁, 魏志强, 等. 近距平行跑道配对进近纵向碰撞风险安全评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 108-113.
LU Fei, ZHANG Zhaoning, WEI Zhiqiang. The longitudinal collision risk safety assessment of closed spaced parallel runways paired approach [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(8): 108-113.
[7] 卢飞, 朱楠, 杨斯, 等. 近距平行跑道配对进近侧向碰撞风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(11): 87-92.
LU Fei, ZHU Nan, YANG Si, et al. Assessment on lateral collision risk of closed spaced parallel runways paired approach[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26 (11): 87-92.
[8] 王莉莉, 朱博, 位放. 近距平行跑道配对进近微观跟驰模型研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(3): 985-988.
WANG Lili, ZHU Bo, WEI Fang. Microscopic tracing model for the paired approach to the narrow-spaced parallel runways[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2017, 17(3): 985-988.
[9] 何昕, 蒋豪, 韩丹. 近距平行跑道配对进近方式的安全区域[J]. 航空工程进展, 2017, 8(3): 321-327.
HE Xin, JIANG Hao, HAN Dan. Research on the safe zones for paired approaches to closely spaced parallel runways[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2017, 8(3): 321-327.
[10] 卢飞, 滕景杰, 吴俊, 等. 尾流影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 99-105.
LU Fei, TENG Jingjie, WU Jun, et al. Lateral collision risk of CSPRs paired approach under wake impact[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2): 99-105.
[11] 卢飞, 滕景杰, 吴俊, 等. 尾涡流场影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞动力学分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 21-27.
LU Fei, TENG Jingjie, WU Jun, et al. Lateral collision dynamics of CSPRs paired approach under influence of wake vortex field [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4): 21-27.
[12] 张敏, 于剑. 基于划分的模糊聚类算法[J]. 软件学报, 2004, 15(6): 858-868.
ZHANG Min, YU Jian. Fuzzy partitional clustering algorithms[J]. Journal of Software, 2004, 15(6): 858-868.
[13] 陆丽娜, 陈亚萍, 魏恒义, 等. 挖掘关联规则中Apriori算法的研究[J]. 小型微型计算机系统, 2000, 21(9): 940-943.
LU Li'na, CHEN Yaping, WEI Hengyi, et al. Research on the algorithm Apriori of mining association rules[J]. Mini-Micro System, 2000,21(9): 940-943.

配对进近侧向位置误差QAR参数关联性分析^*

Correlation analysis of QAR parameters for paired approach lateral position error

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何昕, 马义龙. 基于计算流体力学的配对进近尾流安全间隔研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 77-83.
[2]	卢飞, 滕景杰, 吴俊, 张兆宁, 张宗路. 尾涡流场影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞动力学分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 21-27.
[3]	卢飞, 滕景杰, 吴俊, 张兆宁, 张宗路. 尾流影响下的CSPRs配对进近侧向碰撞风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 99-105.
[4]	卢飞，张兆宁，魏志强，刘碧莲. 近距平行跑道配对进近纵向碰撞风险安全评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 108-.