多因素对液态CO2冻融致裂煤体的影响试验研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.0116

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 58-67.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.0116

多因素对液态CO₂冻融致裂煤体的影响试验研究

周西华¹^,²(), 周露函¹^,³^,^**(), 姜延航¹, 白刚¹, 刘天祥¹, 王学鹏¹

¹ 辽宁工程技术大学安全科学与工程学院,辽宁葫芦岛 125105
² 矿山热动力灾害与防治教育部重点实验室,辽宁葫芦岛 125105
³ 铜仁职业技术学院工学院,贵州铜仁 554300);

收稿日期:2023-02-20 修回日期:2023-05-10 出版日期:2023-07-28
通讯作者:
^** 周露函(1995—)女,贵州毕节人,硕士,讲师,主要从事安全工程方面的工作。E-mail:honor_zlh@163.com。
作者简介:
周西华 (1968—),男,安徽濉溪人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事煤矿火灾防治、瓦斯防治、高温热害防治专业的教学与科研工作。E-mail:xihua_zhou68@163.com。
白刚,副教授
基金资助:
辽宁省教育厅青年项目(LJ2019QL002); 大学生创新创业训练计划项目(X202010147099); 辽宁工程技术大学学科创新团队资助项目(LNTU20TD-29)

Experimental study on influence of multiple factors on liquid CO₂ freeze-thaw cracking coal

ZHOU Xihua¹^,²(), ZHOU Luhan¹^,³^,^**(), JIANG Yanhang¹, BAI Gang¹, LIU Tianxiang¹, WANG Xuepeng¹

¹ College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao Liaoning 125105, China
² Key Laboratory of Mine Thermodynamic Disasters and Control of Ministry of Education (Liaoning Technical University), Huludao Liaoning 125105, China
³ Engineering College, Tongren Polytechnic College, Tongren Guizhou 554300, China

Received:2023-02-20 Revised:2023-05-10 Published:2023-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究多因素耦合对液态CO₂冻融致裂煤体的影响,采用自主研发的液态CO₂冻融致裂试验装置,利用核磁共振测试技术,测定不同影响因素下液态CO₂冻融致裂后煤体的孔隙度,分别研究液态CO₂冻结时间(t)、冻融循环次数(n)和煤体含水饱和度(W)对煤体孔隙度(φ)的影响;采用响应曲面法设计试验,构建φ与t、n和W的二次回归响应曲面模型,分析t、n和W单独及耦合作用时对φ的敏感程度及影响特征,并预测优化与验证不同影响因素下的φ。结果表明:随着t的延长和n的增多,φ呈指数函数关系变化,随W的增大,φ呈线性关系增加;影响因素t、n和W均为φ的极显著项(显著性判别值P<0.01),对φ影响的主次关系为:n>W>t。交互项nt交互作用极显著,nW交互作用次之,Wt交互作用不显著,对φ影响的主次关系为:nt>nW>Wt。模型预测当t、n和W分别为57 min、19次、96%时,φ达到最大值(9.47%),4组试验值与模型预测值平均误差为2.98%,所测φ平均值为9.58%,φ较优化之前(8.94%)提高了7.16%。

关键词: 冻融致裂, 液态CO₂, 孔隙度, 冻结时间, 冻融循环次数, 含水饱和度

Abstract:

In order to study the coupling influence of multi-factor on liquid CO₂ freeze-thaw cracking coal, a liquid CO₂ freeze-thaw cracking test device was designed. The nuclear magnetic resonance testing technology was used to measure the porosity of coal after liquid CO₂ freeze-thaw cracking under different influencing factors. The effects of liquid CO₂ freezing time (t), number of freeze-thaw cycles (n) and water saturation (W) on coal porosity (φ) were studied. The quadratic regression response surface model of φ with t, n and W was constructed by response surface method. The sensitivity of t, n and W to φ single and coupled was analyzed, and the influence characteristics were predicted, optimized and verified under different influencing factors. The results show that the φ changes exponentially with the increase of t and n, and linearly with the increase of W. The influencing factors t, n and W are all extremely significant terms of φ (significant discriminant value P<0.01), and the influence relationship of to φ is as follows: n>W>t. The interaction between nt and Wt is very significant, followed by nW and Wt. The primary and secondary effects on φ are nt>nW>Wt. When t, n and W are 57 min, 19 times and 96%, respectively, the maximum value of φ is 9.47%. The average error between the four test values and the predicted value of the model is 2.98%, and the measured average value of φ is 9.58%, which is 7.16% higher than that before optimization (8.94%).

Key words: freeze-thaw cracking, liquid CO₂, porosity, freeze time, number of freeze-thaw cycles, water saturation

周西华, 周露函, 姜延航, 白刚, 刘天祥, 王学鹏. 多因素对液态CO₂冻融致裂煤体的影响试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 58-67.

ZHOU Xihua, ZHOU Luhan, JIANG Yanhang, BAI Gang, LIU Tianxiang, WANG Xuepeng. Experimental study on influence of multiple factors on liquid CO₂ freeze-thaw cracking coal[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 58-67.

图/表 15

表1

图1

表2

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表3

表4

表5

回归方程方差分析

来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值		P值
模型	56.14	9	6.19	30.25		< 0.000 1
X_t	2.17	1	2.17	13.62		0.008 2
X_n	26.79	1	26.79	130.88		< 0.000 1
X_w	3.69	1	3.69	18.00		0.003 8
X_tn	18.45	1	18.45	90.11		< 0.000 1
X_tw	0.66	1	0.66	3.21		0.116 5
X_nw	1.99	1	1.99	9.71		0.016 9
$X t t$	0.90	1	0.90	4.41		0.073 8
$X n n$	1.13	1	1.13	5.52		0.051 1
$X w w$	1.70	1	1.70	8.31		0.023 5
残差	1.43	7	0.20	—		—
失拟项	0.43	3	0.12	0.98		0.474 2
纯误差	0.084	4	0.021	—		—
总和	58.42	16	R²=0.975		$R A d j 2$ =0.942 8

表5

图9

表6

参考文献 25

[1]	周银波, 王思琪, 赵周, 等. 碱性溶液对煤体甲烷吸附特征影响机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4):28-32. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.005
	ZHOU Yinbo, WANG Siqi, ZHAO Zhou, et al. Influence mechanism of alkaline solution on methane adsorption of coal[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4):28-32. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.04.005
[2]	白鑫, 张东明, 王艳, 等. 液态CO₂相变射流压力变化及其煤岩致裂规律[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(4):661-670.
	BAI Xin, ZHANG Dongming, WANG Yan, et al. Pressure variation and coal fracturing law of liquid CO₂ phase transition jet[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2020, 49(4):661-670.
[3]	LIN Baiquan, LI He, YUAN Desheng, et al. Development and application of an efficient gas extraction model for low-rank high-gas coal beds[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2015, 2(1):76-83.
[4]	YAN Fazhi, LIN Baiquan, XU Jiang, et al. Structural evolution characteristics of middle-high rank coal samples subjected to high-voltage electrical pulse[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(3):3263-3271. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03991
[5]	刘东, 刘文. 水力冲孔压裂卸压增透抽采瓦斯技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(3):136-141.
	LIU Dong, LIU Wen. Research on gas extraction technology: hydraulic stamping and hydro fracture to pressure relief and permeability improvement[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(3):136-141.
[6]	张永将, 黄振飞, 李成成. 高压水射流环切割缝自卸压机制与应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(11):3016-3022.
	ZHANG Yongjiang, HUANG Zhenfei, LI Chengcheng. Investigation and application of high pressure water jet annularity slotting self pressure release mechanism[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(11):3016-3022.
[7]	LIU Yingke, ZHOU Fubao, WANG Jianlong, et al. Approach to increasing the quality of pressure-relieved gas drained from protected coal seam using surface borehole and its industrial application[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2015, 2(1):46-51.
[8]	贾进章, 李斌, 王东明. 煤层液态CO₂相变致裂半径范围的影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4):57-63. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.04.008
	JIA Jinzhang, LI Bin, WANG Dongming. Study on influencing factors of cracking radius range caused by liquid CO₂phase transition in coal seams[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(4):57-63. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.04.008
[9]	马小敏. 液态CO₂相变致裂影响有效抽采半径试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(2):88-93.
	MA Xiaomin. Effect of liquid CO₂ phase change fracturing on effective gas extraction radius-an experimental study[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(2):88-93.
[10]	马征. 煤体层理方向对液态CO₂致裂增透的影响规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2020.
	MA Zheng. Research on the influence law of coal seam bedding direction on liquid CO₂ cracking and permeability enhancement[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining (Beijing), 2020.
[11]	王兆丰, 孙小明, 陆庭侃, 等. 液态CO₂相变致裂强化瓦斯预抽试验研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 34(1):1-5.
	WANG Zhaofeng, SUN Xiaoming, LU Tingkan, et al. Experiment research on strengthening gas drainage effect with fracturing technique by liquid CO₂ phase transition[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University: Natural Science, 2015, 34(1):1-5.
[12]	苏现波, 宋金星, 郭红玉, 等. 煤矿瓦斯抽采增产机制及关键技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(12):1-30.
	SU Xianbo, SONG Jinxing, GUO Hongyu, et al. Production increasing mechanism and key technology of coal mine gas drainage[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2020, 48(12):1-30.
[13]	周西华, 门金龙, 宋东平, 等. 煤层液态CO₂爆破增透促抽瓦斯技术研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(2):60-65.
	ZHOU Xihua, MEN Jinlong, SONG Dongping, et al. Research on increasing coal seam permeability and promoting gas drainage with liquid CO₂blasting[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(2):60-65.
[14]	LIU Xianfeng, NIE Baisheng, GUO Kunyong, et al. Permeability enhancement and porosity change of coal by liquid carbon dioxide phase change fracturing[J]. Engineering Geology, 2021, 287(3):DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106106. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106106
[15]	文虎, 刘名阳, 樊世星, 等. 液态CO₂溶浸煤体孔裂隙演化特征的实验研究[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2020, 40(6):935-944.
	WEN Hu, LIU Mingyang, FAN Shixing, et al. Experimental study on variations of pore-fissure in coal-rock leached by liquid CO₂[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2020, 40(6):935-944.
[16]	翟成, 马征. 煤体层理方向对液态CO₂致裂效果的影响规律[J]. 湖南科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 35(2):1-9.
	ZHAI Cheng, MA Zheng. Influence of bedding planes in coal mass on fracturing effect when cyclically injecting liquid CO₂[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2020, 35(2):1-9.
[17]	徐吉钊, 翟成, 桑树勋, 等. 基于低场核磁共振技术的液态CO₂循环致裂煤体孔隙特征演化规律[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(11):3578-3589.
	XU Jizhao, ZHAI Cheng, SANG Shuxun, et al. Pore evolution of coals affected by cyclical liquid CO₂ fracturing based on the low-field nuclear magnetic resonances[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(11):3578-3589.
[18]	赵丹, 刘晓青. 液态CO₂煤层增透技术及应用研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(10):107-114.
	ZHAO Dan, LIU Xiaoqing. Research and application of anti-reflection technology of liquid CO₂ coal seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(10);107-114.
[19]	徐阳, 黄辉, 楚亚培, 等. 冻融作用下煤体孔隙结构损伤演化规律研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2021, 52(10):38-44.
	XU Yang, HUANG Hui, CHU Yapei, et al. Research on evolution law of coal pore structure damage under the action of freeze-thaw[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(10):38-44.
[20]	张春会, 张海霞, 于永江, 等. 饱水度和再溶浸对液氮冷冻煤致裂的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(增2) : 400-406.
	ZHANG Chunhui, ZHANG Haixia, YU Yongjiang, et al. Effects of saturation and re-submersion on coal fracturing subjected to liquid nitrogen shock[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(S2) : 400-406.
[21]	翟成, 孙勇, 范宜仁, 等. 低场核磁共振技术在煤孔隙结构精准表征中的应用与展望[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(2):828-848.
	ZHAI Cheng, SUN Yong, FAN Yiren, et al. Application and prospect of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology in accurate characterization of coal pore structure[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(2):828-848.
[22]	周尚文, 董大忠, 张介辉, 等. 页岩气储层孔隙度测试方法关键参数优化[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(5):20-29.
	ZHOU Shangwen, DONG Dazhong, ZHANG Jiehui, et al. Optimization of key parameters for porosity measurement of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5):20-29.
[23]	周西华, 姜鹏飞, 白刚, 等. CO₂驱替CH₄置换效率测试与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2):8-13. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.002
	ZHOU Xihua, JIANG Pengfei, BAI Gang, et al. Test and analysis of displacement efficiency of CO₂ replacing CH₄[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2):8-13. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.02.002
[24]	朱红青, 胡超, 周全涛, 等. 响应曲面法优化矿井三相泡沫防灭火材料配方研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(4):120-126.
	ZHU Hongqing, HU Chao, ZHOU Quantao, et al. Study on formula of three-phase foam fire prevention and control material optimized by response surface methodology[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(4):120-126.
[25]	李建涛, 刘向荣, 杨杰, 等. 响应曲面法模拟优化细菌降解光-氧氧化褐煤工艺条件[J]. 煤炭转化, 2020, 43(5):75-81.
	LI Jiantao, LIU Xiangrong, YANG Jie, et al. Simulation and optimization of process conditions for pseudomonas putida degrading photooxidation lignite using response surface methodology[J]. Coal Conversion, 2020, 43(5):75-81.

试验号	X_t /min	X_n /次	X_w /%	φ/%
1	100.00	15.00	70.00	6.7
2	50.00	20.00	70.00	8.87
3	100.00	20.00	40.00	3.89
4	100.00	10.00	100.00	5.94
5	100.00	15.00	70.00	6.85
6	100.00	15.00	70.00	6.59
7	50.00	15.00	40.00	3.82
8	50.00	10.00	70.00	3.45
9	150.00	15.00	40.00	3.85
10	150.00	10.00	70.00	7.01
11	100.00	15.00	70.00	6.76
12	50.00	15.00	100.00	6.69
13	150.00	15.00	100.00	8.34
14	150.00	20.00	70.00	3.84
15	100.00	20.00	100.00	8.94
16	100.00	10.00	40.00	3.71
17	100.00	15.00	70.00	6.97

序号	φ/%		误差/%
序号	预测值	试验值	误差/%
1	9.47	9.78	3.27
2	9.47	9.73	2.75
3	9.47	9.13	3.59
4	9.47	9.69	2.32

多因素对液态CO₂冻融致裂煤体的影响试验研究

Experimental study on influence of multiple factors on liquid CO₂ freeze-thaw cracking coal

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 25

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

试验序号	t /min	n /次	W/%	备注
1	10	0	100	冻结时间影响
2	25	0	100
3	50	0	100
4	100	0	100
5	150	0	100
6	10	5	100	循环次数影响
7	10	10	100
8	10	15	100
9	10	20	100
10	10	0	0	含水饱和度影响
11	10	0	20
12	10	0	40
13	10	0	60
14	10	0	80

影响因素	代号	编码及水平			间隔
影响因素	代号	-1	0	+1	间隔
t/min	X_t	50	100	150	50
n/次	X_n	10	15	20	5
W/%	X_w	40	70	100	30

[1]	刘佳佳, 胡建敏, 杨明, 方迎香, 贾改妮. 不同层理高阶煤孔隙特征的核磁共振试验^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 83-89.
[2]	贾进章, 李斌, 王东明. 煤层液态CO₂相变致裂半径范围的影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(4): 57-63.
[3]	宋东平, 周西华, 李景阳, 白刚. 液态CO₂相变制冷降温试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(8): 120-125.