露天矿用潜孔钻机钻进破岩模型

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.S2.0038

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对潜孔钻机工作过程中存在的冲击力过大导致主体结构变形破裂、冲击破岩过程设备振动不稳定等问题,以露天矿用潜孔钻机为研究对象,分析钻进工况下的破岩特征。首先,分析潜孔钻机冲击破岩机制,获得冲击载荷下岩石破坏的主要模式;然后,对比模型屈服与破坏准则,采用Drucker-Prager模型分析钻头冲击作用下的岩石面破碎效果;最后,利用ABAQUS软件分析不同钻进参数下的冲击破岩特征。结果显示:当冲击力过小且转速过大时,钻头对岩石的作用力不够,钻进效率低;当转速过小且冲击力过大时,岩石未完全破坏,碎屑排出困难,导致破碎效果较差;随着转速的增大,钻进速度呈现先增加后减小的规律;随着冲击力的增加,钻头侵入岩石的能量增加,钻进速度得到提升,但推进力过大会造成钻杆钻进不稳定,导致破岩效果不理想,影响钻进效率。

关键词: 潜孔钻机, 破岩, 钻进速度, ABAQUS软件

Abstract:

In response to the problems of deformation and rupture of the main structure caused by excessive impact force and the unstable vibration of equipment in the process of rock breaking by impact force during the operation of the downhole drilling rig, the downhole drilling rig for open-pit mines was taken as the research object to analyze the rock breaking characteristics under drilling conditions. Firstly, the rock breaking mechanism of the downhole drilling rig by impact force was analyzed to obtain the main modes of rock breaking under impact load. Secondly, by comparing the yield and breaking criteria of the model, the Drucker-Prager model was used to analyze the rock fragmentation effect under the impact of the drill bit. Finally, ABAQUS software was used to analyze the rock breaking characteristics by impact force under different drilling parameters. The results show that when the impact force is too small, and the rotation speed is too high, the force of the drill bit on the rock is not enough, leading to low drilling efficiency. When the rotation speed is too small, and the impact force is too large, the rock is not completely destroyed, and it is difficult to discharge debris, resulting in a poor crushing effect. As the rotation speed increases, the drilling speed first increases and then decreases. As the impact force increases, the energy of the drill bit invading the rock increases, resulting in an increase in drilling speed. However, excessive pushing force can cause unstable drilling of the drill rod, leading to an unsatisfactory rock breaking effect and affecting the drilling efficiency.

Key words: downhole drilling rig, rock breaking, drilling speed, ABAQUS software

中图分类号:

X935

于海旭. 露天矿用潜孔钻机钻进破岩模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S2): 49-54.

YU Haixu. Rock breaking model of downhole drilling rig used in open-pit mine[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S2): 49-54.

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 17

[1]	郑东, 刘卫华, 黄达, 等. 孤石对大口径水平钻机钻进性能影响研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2021, 38(9): 48-53.
	ZHENG Dong, LIU Weihua, HUANG Da, et al. Research on the influence of boulder on the drilling performance of large diameter horizontal drilling machine[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2021, 38(9): 48-53.
[2]	宣弋亭, 祝志强, 徐定邦. ZGYX-460潜孔钻在复杂地质穿孔研究[J]. 世界有色金属, 2020(20): 217-218.
	XUAN Yiting, ZHU Zhiqiang, XU Dingbang. Research on ZGYX-460 DTH drilling in complex geology[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2020(20): 217-218.
[3]	闫少华. 陆地钻机机械设备安全管理现状及应用策略[J]. 中国设备工程, 2020(22): 39-41.
[4]	周宏兵, 刘锋, 陈桂芳, 等. 液压挖掘机回转系统制动平稳性研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2011, 28(11): 379-382.
	ZHOU Hongbing, LIU Feng, CHEN Guifang, et al. Reasearch on braking stability of hydraulic excavator's slewing system[J]. Computer Simulation, 2011, 28(11): 379-382.
[5]	郭娜. 轻型凿岩机器人运动学及力学分析与仿真[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2006.
	GUO Na. The simulation and analysis of kinematics and mechanics for light-duty rock-drilling robot[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2006.
[6]	皂慧丽, 李长春, 刘晓东. 凿岩钻臂模糊PID控制的研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2005, 29(1): 107-110.
	ZAO Huili, LI Changchun, LIU Xiaodong. Fuzzy PID control of rock drilling arm[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2005, 29(1): 107-110.
[7]	赵超泽. 潜孔钻机推进与回转系统的仿真分析与研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2016.
	ZHAO Chaoze. The analysis and simulation of DTH drill propulsion and rotary system[D]. Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2016.
[8]	姬常辉. 露天顶锤式钻机钻臂结构分析及其优化设计[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2014.
	JI Changhui. Surface top hammer drill rig boom structure analysis and optimization design[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014.
[9]	吴双斌. 潜孔钻机钻臂运动学、动力学研究及优化设计[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2011.
[10]	张红, 向正新, 钱利勤, 等. 井眼轨迹控制工具主轴载荷与造斜能力关系研究[J]. 力学与实践, 2017, 39(2): 152-157,134.
	ZHANG Hong, XIANG Zhengxin, QIAN Liqin, et al. The correlation between the spindle load and the deflecting capacity of the wellbore trajectory control tool[J]. Mechanics in Engineering, 2017, 39(2): 152-157,134. doi: 10.3901/JME.2003.10.152
[11]	李永波. 深部干热岩开发钻井井壁裂隙发育及稳定机理研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2022.
	LI Yongbo. Study on fracture development and stability mechanism of deep hot dry rock drilling borehole wall[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2022.
[12]	刘治明, 王毅, 潘宏达. 潜孔钻机防卡钻控制及AMESim防卡钻系统仿真[J]. 机床与液压, 2023, 51(10): 166-169.
	LIU Zhiming, WANG Yi, PAN Hongda. Research on anti-stucking control of down the hole drill and simulation of AMESim anti-stucking system[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2023, 51(10): 166-169.
[13]	吕兆川, 杜佳明, 郑建明, 等. 露天潜孔钻机钻孔出渣颗粒分布试验研究[J]. 矿山机械, 2023, 51(1): 9-13.
	LYU Zhaochuan, DU Jiaming, ZHENG Jianming, et al. Research on particle size distribution of dust from open-air DTH drill rig[J]. Mining & Processing Equipment, 2023, 51(1): 9-13.
[14]	王永龙, 宋维宾, 孙玉宁, 等. 瓦斯抽采钻孔堵塞段卡钻扭矩力学模型分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(6): 92-98.
	WANG Yonglong, SONG Weibin, SUN Yuning, et al. Analysis of pipe-sticking torque mechanical model for gas extraction borehole clogging segment[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(6): 92-98.
[15]	徐银飞. 潜孔钻机不同因素对破岩钻进性能的影响分析[J]. 机械管理开发, 2023, 38(10): 34-35,38.
	XU Yinfei. Analysis of the influence of different factors on the rock-breaking drilling performance of down-the-hole drilling rigs[J]. Mechanical Management and Development, 2023, 38(10): 34-35,38.
[16]	虞小平, 梁都, 虞爱平, 等. 新型灌浆套筒凸肋深度力学性能研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(28): 12 204-12 214.
	YU Xiaoping, LIANG Du, YU Aiping, et al. Mechanical properties of new grouting sleeve rib depth[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(28): 12 204-12 214.
[17]	郑晓霞. 基于ABAQUS的掘进机液压缸轻量化设计[J]. 煤炭技术, 2023, 42(10): 240-242.
	ZHENG Xiaoxia. Lightweight design of hydraulic cylinder of roadheader based on ABAQUS[J]. Coal Technology, 2023, 42(10): 240-242.

方案编号	冲击力/kN	转速/(r·min^-1)
1	30	20
2	50	20
3	70	20
4	50	10
5	50	30