基于中继-巡视无人机协同作业的输电线路山火隐患特征分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.S2.0041

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (S2): 238-244.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.S2.0041

• 防灾减灾技术与工程 • 上一篇

基于中继-巡视无人机协同作业的输电线路山火隐患特征分析

李聪¹(), 许文博¹, 金衍科¹, 汪陈徽¹, 程海涛²

¹ 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院, 北京 100083
² 国网电力空间技术有限公司, 北京 102219

收稿日期:2023-08-12 修回日期:2023-11-07 出版日期:2023-12-30
作者简介:
李聪 (1991—),男,安徽淮南人,博士,讲师,主要从事森林火灾动力学、火灾图像识别研究。E-mail:18600156862@163.com。
程海涛高级工程师
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助(52304274); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(2023ZKPYAQ06)

Characteristics of hill fire hazards in transmission lines based on relay-patrol cooperative operation of UAVs

LI Cong¹(), XU Wenbo¹, JIN Yanke¹, WANG Chenhui¹, CHENG Haitao²

¹ School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
² State Grid Electric Power Space Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102219, China

Received:2023-08-12 Revised:2023-11-07 Published:2023-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为揭示真实环境下输电线路山火隐患特征,提出基于中继-巡视协同作业的无人机巡查技术方案,在全国多个省市开展基于中继-巡视无人机的输电线路巡视作业,深入分析输电线路山火隐患特征。结果表明:输电线路隐患主要包括山火隐患、现场施工隐患以及线路主体隐患,山火隐患占比77.2%是影响输电线路安全的最主要因素。山火隐患从产生原因可分为焚烧杂草、燃烧秸秆、林地/防护林着火以及祭拜烧纸。山火隐患具有明显的时空分布特征,4月份的山火隐患主要集中于清明节祭拜烧纸,78.7%的山火隐患发生在距输电线路50 m以外的区域。山火隐患共包括122次单火源隐患和61次多火源隐患,多火源隐患中双火源隐患较多占比达45.9%,78.6%的多火源点间距位于0~30 m区间。山火隐患的火源面积分布广泛,最大火源面积26.4 m²,最小火源面积0.12 m²,整体上84.4%的火源面积小于4 m²。

关键词: 无人机巡视, 山火隐患, 多火源, 火源间距, 火源面积

Abstract:

In order to reveal the characteristics of hill fire hazards in transmission lines in China's real environments, a technical scheme of UAV patrol based on relay-patrol cooperative operation was proposed. The transmission line patrol based on the relay-patrol operation of UAVs was carried out in many provinces and cities in China, and then the characteristics of hill fire hazards in transmission lines were analyzed. The results show that the hazards in transmission lines mainly include hill fire hazards, on-site construction hazards, and line hazards. The proportion of hill fire hazards is 77.2%, which is the most important factor affecting the safety of transmission lines. The causes of hill fire hazards can be divided into weed burning, straw burning, forest land/shelter forest burning, and paper burning for worshiping. Hill fire hazards have obvious spatial and temporal distribution characteristics. Hill fire hazards in April are mainly caused by paper burning for worshiping on the Qingming Festival, and 78.7% of the hill fire hazards occur in areas 50 m away from the transmission line. There are 122 hill fire hazards caused by a single fire source and 61 hill fire hazards induced by multiple fire sources. Among the hazards induced by multiple fire sources, those caused by double fire sources account for 45.9%, and 78.6% of the multiple fire source points are located in the spacing of 0-30 m. The fire source area of hill fire hazards is widely distributed. The maximum fire source area is 26.4 m², and the minimum fire source area is only 0.12 m². Overall, 84.4% of the fire source area is less than 4 m².

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) patrol, hill fire hazards, multiple fire sources, fire source spacing, fire source area

中图分类号:

X949

李聪, 许文博, 金衍科, 汪陈徽, 程海涛. 基于中继-巡视无人机协同作业的输电线路山火隐患特征分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S2): 238-244.

LI Cong, XU Wenbo, JIN Yanke, WANG Chenhui, CHENG Haitao. Characteristics of hill fire hazards in transmission lines based on relay-patrol cooperative operation of UAVs[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S2): 238-244.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 16

[1]	蒋琴, 钟少波, 朱伟. 京津冀地区森林火灾综合风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10):119-125. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.017
	JIANG Qin, ZHONG Shaobo, ZHU Wei. Research on comprehensive risk assessment of forest fire in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30 (10):119-125. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.10.017
[2]	龙腾腾, 殷继艳, 欧朝蓉, 等. 云南省森林火灾风险综合评价及空间格局研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9):167-173. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.023
	LONG Tengteng, YIN Jiyan, OU Zhaorong, et al. Comprehensive assessment and spatial pattern study on forest fire risk in Yunnan Province[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9):167-173. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.023
[3]	周恩泽, 龚博, 刘淑琴, 等. 南方电网架空线路因山火跳闸故障统计分析[J]. 广东电力, 2022, 35(4):80-86.
	ZHOU Enze, GONG Bo, LIU Shuqin, et al. Statistics and analysis on tripping fault of overhead transmission lines caused by mountain fires in China southern power grids[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2022, 35(4):80-86.
[4]	何诚, 舒立福, 刘柯珍, 等. 广西地区山火引起高压线路跳闸环境特征研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2020, 39(12):1626-1 629.
	HE Cheng, SHU Lifu, LIU Kezhen, et al. Study on environmental characteristics of high voltage line trip caused by mountain fire in Guangxi[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(12):1626-1 629.
[5]	周特军, 吴传平, 陈海翔, 等. 湖南电网输电线路山火跳闸时空分布规律[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(3):417-420.
	ZHOU Tejun, WU Chuanping, CHEN Haixiang, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution laws of transmission line trips caused by wildfire for Hunan power grid[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38(3):417-420.
[6]	韩鹏, 张冰玉. 基于改进蚁群算法的无人机安全航路规划研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1):24-29. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.004
	HAN Peng, ZHANG Bingyu. Safety route planning of UAV based on improved ant colony algorithm[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(1):24-29. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.01.004
[7]	张海军, 赵雪松. 基于GPS的输电线路巡检管理系统的设计与实现[J]. 电网技术, 2005(7):78-81.
[8]	王永昆, 王栋, 孙永杰, 等. 输电线路无人机巡检应用与展望[J]. 电工技术, 2020(1):76-77.
	WANG Yongkun, WANG Dong, SUN Yongjie, et al. Application and prospects of UAV in transmission lines inspection[J]. Electric Engineering, 2020(1):76-77.
[9]	朱松涛, 程海涛, 叶剑锋, 等. 基于无人机中继协同技术的输电通道防山火巡视应用[J]. 浙江电力, 2022, 41(1):89-94.
	ZHU Songtao, CHENG Haitao, YE Jianfeng, et al. Application of patrol against mountain fire in transmission channels based on UAV relaying cooperative technology[J]. Zhejiang Electric Power, 2022, 41(1):89-94.
[10]	王淼, 杜毅, 张忠瑞. 无人机辅助巡视及绝缘子缺陷图像识别研究[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2015, 29(12):1862-1 869.
	WANG Miao, DU Yi, ZHANG Zhongrui. Study on power transmission lines inspection using unmanned aerial vehicle and image recognition of insulator defect[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2015, 29(12):1862-1 869.
[11]	唐俊杰. 电力线路巡视中无人机技术的应用研究[J]. 智能城市, 2020, 6(24):59-60.
[12]	周特军, 李波, 谭艳军, 等. 输电线路山火无人机监测与灭火技术研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2020, 39(2):239-242.
	ZHOU Tejun, LI Bo, TAN Yanjun, et al. Research on monitoring and fire extinguishing technology for wildfires near transmission line based on UAV[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(2):239-242.
[13]	张睿哲, 周恺, 叶宽, 等. 用于长距离电力巡线的轻型太阳能无人机设计[J]. 电力电子技术, 2022, 56(3):97-100.
	ZHANG Ruizhe, ZHOU Kai, YE Kuan, et al. Design of light solar energy unmanned aerial vehicle for long distance power line patrol[J]. Power Electronics, 2022, 56(3):97-100.
[14]	焦嵩鸣, 白健鹏, 首云锋. 风机叶片精准巡视的无人机控制策略研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(10):3822-3 832.
	JIAO Songming, BAI Jianpeng, SHOU Yunfeng. Research on UAV control strategy for accurate inspection of wind turbine blades[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(10):3822-3 832.
[15]	吴飞龙, 林韩, 汤明文, 等. 多种中继方式在大型无人机输电线路巡检中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(2):104-110.
	WU Feilong, LIN Han, TANG Mingwen, et al. Application of various relay modes for transmission line inspection with large-size unmanned helicopters[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(2):104-110.
[16]	苑司坤, 李帅, 王津宇, 等. 输电线路山火监测预警技术研究[J]. 制造业自动化, 2023, 45(11):31-35.
	YUAN Sikun, LI Shuai, WANG Jinyu, et al. Research on monitoring and early warning technology of transmission line mountain fire[J]. Manufacturing Automation, 2023, 45 (11):31-35.

项目	距线路50 m内	距线路50 m外
总次数	39	144
比例/%	21.3	78.7

基于中继-巡视无人机协同作业的输电线路山火隐患特征分析

Characteristics of hill fire hazards in transmission lines based on relay-patrol cooperative operation of UAVs

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 16

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程海涛, 刘俊男, 武卓琦, 李聪, 张伟豪. 无人机-人工协同巡视技术体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 169-173.
[2]	王启飞, 侯程浩, 李聪, 程海涛, 邹彪. 输电线路无人机山火察灭一体化作业流程优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 162-168.
[3]	常章玉，刘琼，黄锐. 石油库油罐防火间距探析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(1): 48-.