煤油气共生矿井油型气涌出危险性定量评价

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.04.0331

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 67-75.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.04.0331

煤油气共生矿井油型气涌出危险性定量评价

魏明尧副研究员¹(), 皇甫昊棋², 高康², 陆春钦², 蔚立元研究员³^,^**(), 付士根教授级高级工程师⁴

¹ 中国矿业大学物联网(感知矿山)研究中心矿山互联网应用技术国家地方联合工程实验室,江苏徐州 221116
² 中国矿业大学安全工程学院,江苏徐州221116
³ 中国矿业大学深地工程智能建造与健康运维全国重点实验室,江苏徐州 221116
⁴ 中国安全生产科学研究院,北京100012

收稿日期:2024-11-10 修回日期:2025-01-13 出版日期:2025-04-28
通信作者:
**蔚立元(1982—),男,山东东平人,博士,研究员,主要从事岩石力学与地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:yuliyuan@cumt.edu.cn。
作者简介:
魏明尧 (1984—),男,江苏徐州人,博士,副研究员,主要从事煤矿安全生产方面的研究工作。E-mail:cumtwmy@sina.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFE0128300); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2023ZDPYTD04)

Quantitative evaluation of oil-type gas emission risk in mine with coal-oil-gas coexistence

WEI Mingyao¹(), HUANGFU Haoqi², GAO Kang², LU Chunqin², YU Liyuan³^,^**(), FU Shigen⁴

¹ National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Internet Application Technology on Mine, IoT Perception Mine Research Center, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China
² School of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China
³ State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China
⁴ China Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Beijing100012, China

Received:2024-11-10 Revised:2025-01-13 Published:2025-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决煤油气共生矿井面临的油型气涌出灾害,提出油型气涌出危险性定量评价技术。首先将煤层顶底板岩层稳定性作为评价油型气涌出的关键参数,并以电阻率水平分布均匀度来表征岩层稳定性,采用直流电法探究顶底板岩层电阻率分布特征,提出基于岩层电阻率变异系数的岩层稳定性动态定量探测方法;同时,综合考虑地质结构的影响,辅以岩层采动破坏深度、力学参数、渗透性及断层构造等静态参数,并采用变权理论的层次分析法(AHP)定量计算出各因素对于评价指标的权重,进而提出油型气涌出危险性的综合定量评价方法;最后定量评价黄陵矿区2个典型区域的油型气涌出危险性,其结果与现场实际油型气抽采钻孔的抽采量数据一致。

关键词: 煤油气共生矿井, 油型气, 涌出危险性, 定量评价, 地质构造, 电阻率, 电法探测

Abstract:

To address the oil-type gas emission hazard in coal-oil-gas coexisting mines, a quantitative risk assessment technology has been proposed. Firstly, the stability of the coal seam roof and floor strata was identified as a key parameter for evaluating oil-type gas gushing. The horizontal resistivity distribution uniformity was used to characterize strata stability. A direct current resistivity method was employed to investigate the resistivity distribution characteristics of the roof and floor strata, and a dynamic quantitative detection method for strata stability based on the resistivity variation coefficient was proposed. Additionally, comprehensive consideration of geological structures was integrated, supplemented by static parameters such as mining-induced damage depth, mechanical properties, permeability of the strata, and fault structures. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on variable weight theory was employed to quantitatively calculate the weight of each factor relative to the evaluation indicators, thereby establishing a comprehensive quantitative evaluation method for oil-type gas gushing risks. Finally, the proposed method was applied to quantitatively assess the oil-type gas gushing risks in two typical areas of the Huangling mining area. The results align with field data from actual oil-type gas extraction boreholes, validating the method's reliability.

Key words: coal-oil-gas coexisting mines, oil-type gas, gas emission hazard, quantitative risk assessment, geologic structure, electrical resistivity, electrical detection

中图分类号:

X935

魏明尧, 皇甫昊棋, 高康, 陆春钦, 蔚立元, 付士根. 煤油气共生矿井油型气涌出危险性定量评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(4): 67-75.

WEI Mingyao, HUANGFU Haoqi, GAO Kang, LU Chunqin, YU Liyuan, FU Shigen. Quantitative evaluation of oil-type gas emission risk in mine with coal-oil-gas coexistence[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 67-75.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

表3

图6

图7

表4

表5

图8

参考文献 19

[1]	赵继展, 张群, 郑凯歌, 等. 黄陵矿区煤矿井下围岩喷涌气体致灾机理及防治措施[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(11): 114-121.
	ZHAO Jizhan, ZHANG Qun, ZHENG Kaige, et al. Disaster-causing mechanism of surrounding rock gas flowing underground in the Huangling mining area and prevention measures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(11): 114-121.
[2]	方祖康, 庞雄奇, 高春文. 煤型气和油型气的概念及其类型划分[J]. 天然气工业, 1988, 8(1): 13-17.
	FANG Zukang, PANG Xiongqi, GAO Chunwen. Idea of coll-formed gas and oil-related gas and their classification[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1988, 8(1): 13-17.
[3]	韩中喜, 李剑, 严启团, 等. 天然气汞含量作为煤型气与油型气判识指标的探讨[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(2): 323-327. doi: 10.7623/syxb201302014
	HAN Zhongxi, LI Jian, YAN Qituan, et al. Discussion on the applicability of mercury content in natural gases as an identification index of coal-type gas and oil-type gas[J]. Acta Petroleum Sinica, 2013, 34(2): 323-327.
[4]	唐恩贤. 黄陵矿区煤层底板异常涌出气体成因类型[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2015, 43(6): 8-11.
	TANG Enxian. Genetic type of abnormal gas emission from coal seam floor in Huangling mining area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2015, 43(6):8-11.
[5]	孙四清. 煤油气共存矿井掘进工作面底板油型气涌出机理探讨[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2017, 44(4): 90-94.
	SUN Siqing. Discussion on oil-type gas emission mechanism from heading face floor in coal-oil-gas coexisting mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2017, 44(4): 90-94.
[6]	孙四清, 陈冬冬, 龙威成, 等. 煤油气共存矿井油型气精准治理技术及工程实践[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(5): 60-66.
	SUN Siqing, CHEN Dongdong, LONG Weicheng, et al. Technology of precise control of oil-type gas and engineering practice in coal mine with coal-oil-gas coexistence[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(5): 60-66.
[7]	张俭让, 张荃, 董丁稳, 等. 油型气涌出矿井CH₄扩散规律数值模拟[J]. 煤炭技术, 2015, 34(10): 136-138.
	ZHANG Jianrang, ZHANG Quan, DONG Dingwen, et al. Law of gas distribution of numerical simulation with oil-type gas emission[J]. Coal Technology, 2015, 34(10): 136-138.
[8]	张俭让, 张玲洁, 李倩玉. 油型气涌出矿井局部通风排瓦斯优化[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2017, 37(6): 823-828.
	ZHANG Jianrang, ZHANG Lingjie, LI Qianyu. Gas-exhausting optimization of drivage roadway under the condition of oil-type gas emission[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2017, 37(6): 823-828.
[9]	司俊鸿, 许敏, 郑凯凯, 等. 黄陇矿区瓦斯-油型气混合气体爆炸特性及预警技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(8): 251-256.
	SI Junhong, XU Min, ZHENG Kaikai, et al. Characteristics and early warning technology of gas-oil explosion in Huanglong mining area[J]. Coal Science & Technology, 2019, 47(8): 251-256.
[10]	殷民胜, 刘耀宗. 黄陵二号煤矿底板油型气释放规律及影响因素[J]. 陕西煤炭, 2023, 42(6):24-28.
	YIN Minsheng, LIU Yaozong. Oil-type gas releasing regularity and influential factors of Huangling No.2 coal mine floor[J]. Shaanxi Coal, 2023, 42(6):24-28.
[11]	郑凯歌, 孙四清, 赵继展, 等. 黄陵矿区围岩气体成因及致灾机理研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(8):139-146.
	ZHENG Kaige, SUN Siqing, ZHAO Jizhan, et al. Study on genetic and destructive mechanism of gas from surrounding rock in Huangling mining area[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49 (8): 139-146.
[12]	牟全斌. 煤油气共生矿井底板油型气赋存特征及防治[J]. 能源与环保, 2020, 42(12): 76-80,88.
	MOU Quanbin. Occurrence characteristics and prevention of oil-type gas in coal-gas symbiosis mine floor[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2020, 42(12): 76-80,88.
[13]	方林, 龚晟, 王桂林, 等. 基于突变理论的隔水岩体失稳分析及安全厚度计算[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(3):76-83. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.03.0344
	FANG Lin, GONG Sheng, WANG Guilin, et al. Instability analysis and safe thickness calculation of waterproof rock mass based on mutation theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(3):76-83. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.03.0344
[14]	李毛飞, 刘树才, 姜志海, 等. 矿井直流电透视底板探测及三维反演解释[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(7): 2708-2721.
	LI Maofei, LIU Shucai, JIANG Zhihai, et al. Detecting floor geological information by mine DC perspective and 3D inversion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(7): 2708-2721.
[15]	马进功. 基于变权模糊理论的残煤连采可行性评价研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(8): 30-37.
	MA Jingong. Study on feasibility evaluation of continuous mining of residual coal based on variable weight fuzzy theory[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(8): 30-37.
[16]	江新, 王婧雯, 王耀威, 等. 突变视角下地下深埋隧洞塌方风险耦合演化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(5):103-111. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.1494
	JIANG Xin, WANG Jingwen, WANG Yaowei, et al. Study on coupling evolution of collapse risk of deep underground tunnel from perspective of catastrophe[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(5):103-111. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.05.1494
[17]	武强, 李博, 刘守强, 等. 基于分区变权模型的煤层底板突水脆弱性评价:以开滦蔚州典型矿区为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(9): 1516-1521.
	WU Qiang, LI Bo, LIU Shouqiang, et al. Vulnerability assessment of coal floor groundwater burstiong based on zoning variable weight model: a case study int the typical mining region of Kailuan[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(9): 1516-1521.
[18]	马进功, 宋德军. 基于变权模糊理论的掘锚一体机组掘进适用性数学评价[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(6): 2579-2589.
	MA Jingong, SONG Dejun. Mathematical evaluation on the applicability of bolter miners based on variable weight fuzzy theory[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(6): 2579-2589.
[19]	张金才, 张玉卓, 刘天泉. 岩体渗流与煤层底板突水[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1997: 20-35.

区域	平均值	标准差	变异系数
413工作面200 m	0.050 2	0.054 8	1.092 1
413工作面250 m	0.087 7	0.084 6	0.965 0
北二运输巷	0.065 1	0.077 5	1.190 3
北二辅运巷	0.063 4	0.075 1	1.184 8

影响因素	电性	采动影响	渗透性	断层构造
电性	1	P12	P13	P14
采动影响	P21	1	P23	P24
渗透性	P31	P32	1	P34
断层构造	P41	P42	P43	1

测量区域	测量次序	油型气涌出危险性评价指标
413巷道	第1次	0.19
	第2次	0.34
	第3次	0.15
	第4次	0.13
	第5次	0.18
北二巷道	第1次	0.20
	第2次	0.31
	第3次	0.49
	第4次	0.48
	第5次	0.59
	第6次	0.31
	第7次	0.54

涌出危险性评价指标Q	涌出危险性类型
(0.0, 0.2]	顶底板稳定,油型气涌出危险性低
(0.2, 0.4]	顶底板较稳定,油型气涌出危险性较低
(0.4, 0.7]	顶底板不稳定,存在断层等地质构造,油型气涌出危险性高
(0.7, 1.0]	顶底板极度不稳定,存在大尺度断层构造,油型气涌出危险性高

煤油气共生矿井油型气涌出危险性定量评价

Quantitative evaluation of oil-type gas emission risk in mine with coal-oil-gas coexistence

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 19

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高魁, 乔国栋, 刘健, 张树川. 构造复杂矿区煤与瓦斯突出瓦斯地质分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 119-124.
[2]	刘勇, 崔洪庆, 袁东升. 构造煤电位电极系测井响应特征分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 122-127.
[3]	佟瑞鹏，李春旭，郑毛景，邓晓瑞. 拥挤踩踏事故风险定量评价模型及其优化分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(12): 90-.
[4]	吴超凡，胡雄武，刘盛东，王勃，邱占林. 巷道掘进工作面瞬变电磁超前探测模拟及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(9): 121-.
[5]	舒龙勇，程远平，王亮，蒋静宇，翟清伟，孔胜利. 地质因素对煤层瓦斯赋存影响的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(2): 121-.
[6]	陈文瑛，吴穹，王勇毅. 机械安全性评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(1): 77-.
[7]	韩朱旸，翁文国. 燃气管网定量风险分析方法综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(7): 154-.
[8]	张元. 民航安全风险定量评价模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(9): 140-.
[9]	何俊，潘结南，聂百胜. 瓦斯涌出严重程度分形预测研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(5): 22-.
[10]	蔡康旭，李永山. 红外探测巷道围岩地质构造的理论与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2002, 12(3): 59-.