构造煤电位电极系测井响应特征分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.021

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 122-127.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.04.021

构造煤电位电极系测井响应特征分析

刘勇^1,2,3 讲师, 崔洪庆^1,2,3 教授, 袁东升^1,2 教授

1 河南理工大学安全科学与工程学院,河南焦作 454003
2 河南省瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理重点实验室——省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,河南焦作 454003
3 中原经济区煤层(页岩)气协同创新中心,河南焦作 454003

收稿日期:2018-01-09 修回日期:2018-03-15 出版日期:2018-04-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
作者简介:刘勇(1977—),男,山西原平人,博士,讲师,主要从事瓦斯地质方面的研究。E-mail:Liuyong@hpu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(41372160);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(16A440009)。

Analysis of potential electrode system logging response features of tectonic coal

LIU Yong^1,2,3, CUI Hongqing^1,2,3, YUAN Dongsheng^1,2

1 School of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454003,China
2 Henan Provincial Key Lab of Gas Geology and Gas Control Cultivation Base of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China
3 Collaborative Innovation Center of Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas for Central Plains Economic Region, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China

Received:2018-01-09 Revised:2018-03-15 Online:2018-04-28 Published:2020-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高用电位电极系测井曲线判识构造煤的准确性,建立构造煤居中的水平3层含构造煤岩层模型,并将其划分为4种岩层结构类型和4种电阻率关系类型;在给定钻孔和泥浆侵入带参数下,应用有限元软件ANSYS10.0对4种电阻率关系类型对应的含构造煤岩层模型进行电位电极系测井数值模拟,分析数值模拟曲线中构造煤的响应特征;最后,对桃山矿93煤层多组测井曲线进行构造煤判识。研究表明:含构造煤岩层模型电位电极系测井曲线呈波峰、波谷、上台阶和下台阶等4种基本形态;曲线上凹弧的拐点为极大视电阻率点时可作为构造煤分界点的参考点,且误差小于1/2电极距。

关键词: 构造煤, 电位电极系测井, 视电阻率, 数值模拟, 判识

Abstract: In order to improve the accuracy of tectonic coal identification by means of potential electrode system logging curves,a horizontal three layer rock strata model with tectonic coal as the middle layer was established, and four rock strata structure types and four resistivity relationship types were divided. With the given parameters of drilling and mud-invaded zone, numerical simulations of the resistivity relationship types were made by ANSYS 10.0 software, and morphological features and demarcation points features of numerical simulation resultant curves were analyzed. On the basis of logging curves of No.93 coal seam in Taoshan coal mine tectonic coal identification was made, and the identification results were verified by using cataloging data of tectonic coals in Taoshan coal mine. The results demonstrate that there are four basic curve shapes, crest shape, trough shape, rising-step shape, and dropping-step shape, corresponding to the four resistivity relationship types, and that the maxima nodes(turning points) of the concave arcs could be used as the tectonic coal interfaces reference points on the numerical simulation curves, and the errors are less than a half of the electrode spacing.

Key words: tectonic coal, potential electrode system logging, apparent resistivity, numerical simulation, identification

中图分类号:

X936

刘勇, 崔洪庆, 袁东升. 构造煤电位电极系测井响应特征分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 122-127.

LIU Yong, CUI Hongqing, YUAN Dongsheng. Analysis of potential electrode system logging response features of tectonic coal[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(4): 122-127.

参考文献

[1] 张子敏,张玉贵.瓦斯地质规律与瓦斯预测[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2005:23-25.
[2] 王刚,程卫民,谢军,等.煤与瓦斯突出过程中煤体瓦斯的作用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(9):116-120.
WANG Gang, CHENG Weimin,XIE Jun, et al. Study on the effect of gas in the coal and gas outburst[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(9): 116-120.
[3] 高魁,刘泽功,刘健.复合构造带力学特征及其对瓦斯突出的作用机制[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(5):111-116.
GAO Kui, LIU Zegong, LIU Jian. Mechanical characteristics of complex geological structure zone and its effect on gas outburst[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(5): 111-116.
[4] 侯泉林,李会军,范俊佳,等.构造煤结构与煤层气赋存研究进展[J].中国科学:地球科学,2012,42(10): 1 487-1 495.
HOU Quanlin, LI Huijun, FAN Junjia, et al. Structure and coalbed methane occurrence in tectonically deformed coals[J]. Scientia Sinica:Terrae, 2012, 55: 1 755-1 763.
[5] 王定武.利用模拟测井曲线判识构造煤的研究[J].中国煤田地质,1997,9(4):70-73.
WANG Dingwu. Study on identifying deformed coal with logging data[J]. Coal Geology of China, 1997, 9(4): 70-73.
[6] 龙王寅,朱文伟,徐静,等.利用测井曲线判识煤体结构探讨[J],中国煤田地质,1999,11(2):64-66.
LONG Wangyin, ZHU Wenwei, XU Jing, et al. Discussion of identifying coal structure with logging data[J]. Coal Geology of China, 1999, 11(2): 64-66.
[7] 彭苏萍,杜文凤,苑春方,等.不同结构类型煤体地球物理特征差异分析和纵横波联合识别与预测方法研究[J].地质学报,2008,82(10):1 311-1 322.
PENG Suping,DU Wenfeng,YUAN Chunfang,et al. Identification and forecasting of different structural coals by P-wave and S-wave from well-logging[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(10): 1 311-1 322.
[8] 黄作华.煤田测井方法与数字处理(上册)[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1982:8-36.
[9] 谢广润.电力系统接地技术[M].北京:中国电力出版社,1999:27-36.
[10] 赵志斌.复杂土壤中接地网性能分析与变电站内空间电磁场计算[D].保定:华北电力大学,2004.
ZHAO Zhibin. Performance analysis of grounding systems in complex soil structure and computation for electromagnetic fields of transformer substation[D]. Baoding: North China Electric Power University, 2004.
[11] KHOKHAR R W, JOHNSON W M J. A deep laterolog for ultrathin formation evaluation[C]. Proceedings of Society of Professional Well Log Analysts,SPWLA 30^thAnnual Logging Symposium, 1989: 1-10.
[12] 孙明礼,胡仁喜,崔海蓉,等.ANSYS 10.0电磁学有限元分析实例指导教程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007:278-293.
[13] 孙四清,陈致胜,韩保山,等.测井曲线判识构造软煤技术预测煤与瓦斯突出[J].煤田地质与勘探,2006,34(4):65-67.
SUN Siqing, CHEN Zhisheng, HAN Baoshan, et al. Technology of identifying deformed soft coal using well log: an approach to the regional prediction of coal and gas outburst in coal mine[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2006, 34(4): 65-67.
[14] 吕绍林,何继善.瓦斯突出煤体的导电性质研究[J].中南工业大学学报,1998,29(6):511-514.
LYU Shaolin, HE Jishan. Electrical property measurements for the outburst coal mass[J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 1998, 29(6): 511-514.
[15] 汤友谊,孙四清,郭纯,等.不同煤体结构类型煤分层视电阻率值的测试[J].煤炭科学技术,2005,33(3):70-72.
TANG Youyi, SUN Siqing, GUO Chun, et al. Measurement of apparent resistivity value for coal slices of different coal seam structures[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2005, 33(3): 70-72.
[16] 王兵团.平面曲线离散点集拐点的快速查找算法[J].北方交通大学学报,2001,25(6):85-87.
WANG Bingtuan. Quick locating algorithm for turning points in discrete point set of plane curve[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 2001, 25(6): 85-87.

构造煤电位电极系测井响应特征分析

Analysis of potential electrode system logging response features of tectonic coal

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李刚, 刘海振, 杨庆贺, 牛伟锋. 带压开采煤层底板破坏特征与突水风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 68-76.
[2]	郑艾辰, 向晋扬, 黄锋, 金成昊, 刘星辰. 空洞对隧道结构安全影响试验与模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 119-126.
[3]	游波, 毛聪, 施式亮, 刘何清, 鲁义, 李敏. 矿用通风服微空间环境变化特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 185-193.
[4]	冯巩, 夏元友, 王智德, 严敏嘉. 基于位移信息融合的露天矿边坡动态预警方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 116-122.
[5]	鲁义, 杨帆, 刘欢, 陈健, 王金鹏, 李文辉. 气凝胶消防救援服内衬的热阻计算^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 201-207.
[6]	张钧祥, 刘彦伟, 任培良, 韩红凯, 左伟芹. 基于蠕变效应的穿层钻孔封孔参数优化与试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 97-104.
[7]	丁厚成, 连志虚, 邓权龙, 蒋仲安, 杨利炜, 葛梦圆. 振弦栅与高压喷雾协同作用下除尘特性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 106-112.
[8]	荆德吉, 贾鑫, 张天, 孟祥曦, 马明星, 王志恒. 落煤过程中涡旋吹吸式除尘技术数值模拟及试验[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 121-127.
[9]	朱豪豪, 郭海林, ZHUMAKELDI A. 外力作用下管道内表面缺陷处裂纹扩展研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 66-72.
[10]	姜学鹏, 陈欣格, 郭昆. 侧部点式排烟隧道火灾临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 105-111.
[11]	王亮, 孙毅民, 褚鹏, 赵伟, 邹双英. 基于时空分布特征的煤层瓦斯测压准确性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 40-47.
[12]	张萌, 刘宏磊, 乔文光, 高勋. 排土场稳定性影响因素显著性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 69-75.
[13]	曲国娜, 李红健, 贾廷贵, 强倩, 王来贵. 煤堆自燃特征的试验研究与数值模拟^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 69-77.
[14]	荆德吉, 魏德宁, 马明星, 张天, 孟祥曦, 任帅帅. 胶带运输巷粉尘运移及气动喷雾降尘技术^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 93-99.
[15]	崔村燕, 柳宁远, 段永胜, 同江. 长贮库房内偏二甲肼扩散浓度快速估算方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 109-115.