400 km/h高速列车过隧道时列车风特性研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.01.0435

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 106-115.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.01.0435

400 km/h高速列车过隧道时列车风特性研究

熊小慧¹^,²^,³(), 张朵朵¹^,²^,³, 耿语堂¹^,²^,³, 杨波¹^,²^,³, 唐明赞¹^,²^,³, 陈光¹^,²^,³

¹ 中南大学轨道交通安全教育部重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410075
² 中南大学轨道交通安全关键技术国际合作联合实验室, 湖南长沙 410075
³ 中南大学轨道交通列车安全保障技术国家地方联合工程研究中心, 湖南长沙 410075

收稿日期:2023-08-18 修回日期:2023-11-20 出版日期:2024-01-28
作者简介:
熊小慧 (1978—),男,湖北天门人,博士,教授,主要从事轮轨和磁浮列车空气动力学数值仿真及试验、轨道交通行车安全等方面的研究。E-mail: xhxiong@csu.edu.cn。
陈光,讲师
基金资助:
国家重点研发项目(2020YFA071903-1); 湖南省自然科学基金资助(2021JJ30849); 中国国家铁路集团有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(P2021T013)

Study on slipstream characteristics of 400 km/h high-speed trains passing through tunnels

XIONG Xiaohui¹^,²^,³(), ZHANG Duoduo¹^,²^,³, GENG Yutang¹^,²^,³, YANG Bo¹^,²^,³, TANG Mingzan¹^,²^,³, CHEN Guang¹^,²^,³

¹ Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track of Ministry of Education, Central South University,Changsha Hunan 410075, China
² Joint International Research Laboratory of Key Technology for Rail Traffic Safety, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410075, China
³ National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Safety Technology for Rail Vehicle, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410075, China

Received:2023-08-18 Revised:2023-11-20 Published:2024-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探明400 km/h高速列车在隧道内运行时的列车风特性,采用三维、非定常、可压缩和可实现的k-ε湍流模型进行数值模拟计算,分析隧道内列车风时域演变特征和空间分布特征,并按照列车各部分到达和驶离测点的时间对车体周围流场进行分区,采用5个特征参数衡量各区域内列车风速度的变化,探讨列车编组长度和隧道长度对列车风的影响。研究结果表明:隧道内列车风时域变化特征受列车运行位置和隧道内压力波传播的显著影响;列车风正峰值会随着列车编组长度、列车速度的增大而增加,且峰值到达时刻分别延后和提前,8车编组对应的列车风正峰值相较于 3车编组时增加68.75%,400 km/h时的列车风正峰值相较于300 km/h时增加22.65%;同种隧道长度下的列车风速度最大正峰值出现在隧道中点位置处,且此处的波动更为剧烈复杂,主要是压缩波和膨胀波叠加得更加频繁。长隧道内压力波系叠加对列车风速度峰值的影响减弱,当隧道长度达到 3 km 时,列车风正峰值相较于1 km长度时下降30.70%。

关键词: 高速列车, 400km/h高速铁路, 隧道, 列车风, 数值模拟

Abstract:

To explore the slipstream characteristics of 400 km/h high-speed trains passing through tunnels, a three-dimensional, unsteady, compressible and realizable k-ε turbulence model was used to perform numerical simulations to analyze the time evolution and spatial distributions of slipstream in tunnels. In addition, the flow field around the train was zoned according to the times when each part of the train reached and left the measuring point. Five characteristic parameters were used to measure the change of the slipstream speed in each area. The influence of different train formation lengths and tunnel lengths was discussed. The research results show that the change characteristics of slipstream in the tunnel are significantly affected by the train running position and pressure wave propagation. The slipstream peak increases with the increase of train formation length and speed, and the peak arrival time is delayed and advanced. The positive peak value of 8 formation is 68.75% higher than that of 3 formation, and the peak value at 400 km/h is 22.65% higher than that of 300 km/h. Under the same tunnel length, the maximum positive peak slipstream appears at the midpoint of the tunnel, and the fluctuations here are more intense and complex. The influence of pressure wave in the long tunnel on the peak slipstream speed is weakened. When the tunnel length reaches 3km, the positive peak slipstream drops by 30.70% compared with the length of 1km.

Key words: high-speed train, 400km/h high-speed railway, tunnel, slipstream, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

X951交通运输安全

熊小慧, 张朵朵, 耿语堂, 杨波, 唐明赞, 陈光. 400 km/h高速列车过隧道时列车风特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 106-115.

XIONG Xiaohui, ZHANG Duoduo, GENG Yutang, YANG Bo, TANG Mingzan, CHEN Guang. Study on slipstream characteristics of 400 km/h high-speed trains passing through tunnels[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(1): 106-115.

图/表 17

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

参考文献 22

[1]	熊嘉阳, 沈志云. 中国高速铁路的崛起和今后的发展[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(5): 6-29.
	XIONG Jiayang, SHEN Zhiyun. Rise and future development of Chinese high-speed railway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(5): 6-29.
[2]	黄德青, 倪陈佳, 秦娜, 等. 考虑最小延误状态的车站冗余时间再分配研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 66-72. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.06.2306
	HUANG Deqing, NI Chenjia, QIN Na, et al. Research on redundant time reallocation at stations for purpose of minimum delay[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 66-72. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.06.2306
[3]	魏雨生. 时速400 km高速列车过隧气动效应的数值模拟与分析[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2020.
	WEI Yusheng. Numerical simulation and analysis on aerodynamic effects of high-speed train passing through tunnels with 400 km/h[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2020.
[4]	王磊, 骆建军, 李飞龙, 等. 高速铁路双线隧道内列车风分布及流场特性[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 52(4): 1346-1357.
	WANG Lei, LUO Jianjun, LI Feilong, et al. Train-induced wind distribution and flow field characteristics in high-speed railway double-track tunnel[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2021, 52(4): 1346-1357.
[5]	费瑞振, 彭立敏, 杨伟超, 等. 高速铁路隧道空气动力效应对人员安全的影响研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(7): 79-84.
	FEI Ruizhen, PENG Limin, YANG Weichao, et al. Study on aerodynamic force effect on personnel safety in high-speed railway tunnel[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(7): 79-84.
[6]	GILBERT T, BAKER C, QUINN A. Gusts caused by high-speed trains in confined spaces and tunnels[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2013, 121: 39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.015
[7]	SUZUKI M, IDO A, SAKUMA Y, et al. Full-scale measurement and numerical simulation of flow around high-speed train in tunnel[J]. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation & Logistics, 2008, 1(3): 281-292.
[8]	SAKUMA Y, SUZUKI M. Measurement of velocity and pressure fluctuations around high-speed train running in tunnel[C]. Proceedings of the 9^th World Congress on Railway Research, 2011: 22-26.
[9]	王磊, 骆建军, 李飞龙. 高速列车过双线隧道气动效应及列车风特性[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2021, 53(9): 43-52.
	WANG Lei, LUO Jianjun, LI Feilong. Aerodynamic effects and train wind characteristics of high-speed train passing through double-track tunnel[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021, 53(9): 43-52.
[10]	LI Wenhui, LIU Tanghong, CHEN Zhengwei, et al. Comparative study on the unsteady slipstream induced by a single train and two trains passing each other in a tunnel[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 198: DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2020.10409.
[11]	BS EN 14067-3-2003, Railway applications aerodynamics part 3: aerodynamics in tunnels[S].
[12]	CHEN Guang, LI Xiaobai, LIU Zhen, et al. Dynamic analysis of the effect of nose length on train aerodynamic performance[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 184: 198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.11.021
[13]	GUO Dilong, SHANG Keming, ZHANG Ye, et al. Influences of affiliated components and train length on the train wind[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2016, 32(2): 191-205. doi: 10.1007/s10409-015-0553-z
[14]	管鸿浩, 龚彦峰, 踪敬良, 等. 高速列车单列通过时双线隧道内列车风分布规律研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2022, 66(6):83-89.
	GUAN Honghao, GONG Yanfeng, ZONG Jingliang, et al. Study on the slipstream distribution by a single train running through a double-track tunnel[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2022, 66(6): 83-89.
[15]	牛纪强. 高速列车通过隧道时产生的列车风研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2015, 12(6): 1268-1276.
	NIU Jiqiang. Research on gusts caused by high-speed trains passing through tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2015, 12(6): 1268-1276.
[16]	罗禄森, 王田天, 杨伟超, 等. 400 km/h+高速铁路隧道内气动效应及净空断面积分析[J]. 高速铁路技术, 2021, 12(2): 96-101.
	LUO Lusen, WANG Tiantian, YANG Weichao, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic effect and clearance sectional area in tunnels of 400 km/h+ high-speed railway[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2021, 12(2): 96-101.
[17]	WANG Tiantian, WU Fan, YANG Mingzhi, et al. Reduction of pressure transients of high-speed train passing through a tunnel by cross-section increase[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 183: 235-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.11.001
[18]	JIANG Zhenhua, LIU Tanghong, CHEN Xiaodong, et al. Numerical prediction of the slipstream caused by the trains with different marshalling forms entering a tunnel[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 189: 276-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.04.002
[19]	GUO Zijian, LIU Tanghong, CHEN Zhenwei, et al. Comparative numerical analysis of the slipstream caused by single and double unit trains[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 172: 395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.022
[20]	王宏林, 雷波, 毕海权. 压缩波惯性作用对其波形演变的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2015, 50(1): 118-123.
	WANG Honglin, LEI Bo, BI Haiquan. Influence of inertial effect of compression wave on waveform evolution[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(1): 118-123.
[21]	BELL J, BURTON D, THOMPSON M, et al. The effect of tail geometry on the slipstream and unsteady wake structure of high-speed trains[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 83: 215-230. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.01.014
[22]	XIA Chao, WANG Hanfeng, BAO Di, et al. Unsteady flow structures in the wake of a high-speed train[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2018, 98: 381-396. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.06.010

400 km/h高速列车过隧道时列车风特性研究

Study on slipstream characteristics of 400 km/h high-speed trains passing through tunnels

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	彭亚雄, 周子霈, 姚颖康, 刘运思, 左清军. 爆破作用下层状围岩隧道突变失稳判据研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 171-178.
[2]	宋慧来, 林锦镇, 蒋典佑, 张鲁顺, 禹雷. 隧道内无砟轨道上拱变形特征及行车安全性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 187-192.
[3]	彭善碧, 李薇, 唐平. 基于FLACS的地下暗厨房燃气爆炸数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 215-222.
[4]	梁波, 秦灿, 牛佳安, 肖靖航, 文森. 基于Topsis改进因子分析的公路隧道入口段视觉负荷研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(1): 77-84.
[5]	万利, 张长安, 李璟, 张宇, 孙昌海, 阎莹. 隧道彩色路面和侧墙设计对驾驶行为的影响分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 25-34.
[6]	张莉聪, 李斯曼, 周振兴. 煤矿瓦斯多相协同抑爆的研究进展与展望[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(S1): 97-104.
[7]	王景春, 李永昊, 刘凯林, 赵飞. 改进系统布置设计的山岭隧道施工场地安全布局[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(9): 33-40.
[8]	张健, 张鹏妍, 魏建平, SI Guangyao, 许博, 许振国. 巷道围岩调热圈分布特性研究:以羊场湾煤矿为例[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 125-133.
[9]	郑号染, 杜志刚, 王首硕, 文竞舟, 焦方通. 基于线性诱导的高速公路隧道交通安全优化设计[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 134-141.
[10]	安伟光, 广大庆. 隧道运动体火灾温度分布及烟气输运特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 77-83.
[11]	乔力伟, 桑琮辉, 王列妮, 赵延法, 袁文超. 双通道供风条件下施工隧道最优风速参数研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 105-112.
[12]	何路, 张晓锦, 王东伟, 朱国庆, 袁狄平, 徐志胜. 隧道火灾集中排烟系统排热效率预测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 113-120.
[13]	仇培云, 陈俊沣, 程辉航, 龙增, 钟茂华. 地铁停车线区域通风排烟模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 156-163.
[14]	李沛琳, 蒋仲安, 曾发镔. 制曲车间多尘源粉尘分布特征数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 130-139.
[15]	张仲宇, 李兆平, 杨航, 龙奇峰, 冯超. 并行基坑施工对邻近桥梁影响及保护措施[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(3): 68-74.