中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 287-293.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.08.0898

• 智能安全技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能辅助化工本质安全决策的适用性研究

徐洪龙(), 郝金庆   

  1. 江苏虹港石化有限公司, 江苏 连云港 222065
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-25 修回日期:2026-06-15 出版日期:2026-08-28
  • 作者简介:

    徐洪龙 (1984—),男,江苏连云港人,本科,工程师,主要从事化工安全生产技术和管理方面的工作。E-mail:

    郝金庆 工程师

Applicability of artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making for inherent safety in chemical process

Xu Honglong(), Hao Jinqing   

  1. Jiangsu Honggang Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Lianyungang Jiangsu 222065, China
  • Received:2026-03-25 Revised:2026-06-15 Published:2026-08-28

摘要:

为探究人工智能(AI)助力化工本质安全决策的可行性,针对化工过程本质安全设计中风险识别滞后、参数控制边界无法动态确定及复杂工况下决策支撑不足等问题,建立数据采集-风险识别-策略生成的3层决策模型,将深度学习、知识图谱及强化学习方法融入到化工本质安全设计流程,对放热反应系统、轻质可燃气体储运、高压气体压缩系统、酸碱中和工艺及含氧有机物反应等典型工艺场景展开分析,结合仿真结果和案例数据,验证模型在风险识别、路径优化及策略生成方面的效能。结果表明:模型可实现高危工艺路径的动态识别和参数关联分析,在放热反应控制、泄漏风险区识别、高压系统异常预警、酸碱度指数(pH)漂移调控及爆炸极限判定等场景中,均输出相应决策;模型应用受可解释性、数据质量、接口兼容性及合规衔接等因素制约;AI可嵌入化工本质安全决策流程,在多源数据整合、复杂风险识别及设计策略生成方面发挥支撑作用,其适用性具有显著的工艺场景依赖性,工程化应用尚需依托模型透明化、数据标准化及系统集成能力的持续提升。

关键词: 人工智能(AI), 化工本质安全, 本质安全决策, 典型工艺场景, 适用性

Abstract:

To investigate the feasibility of applying artificial intelligence (AI)to inherent safety decision-making for chemical process, a decision-making framework comprising data collection, risk identification, and strategy development was developed to address delayed risk identification, the challenges of dynamically determining control parameters, and the lack of decision support under complex operating conditions. Deep learning, knowledge graph, and reinforcement learning were integrated into the safety design process. The framework was evaluated using representative process scenarios, including exothermic reaction systems, storage and transport of easily combustible light gases, high-pressure gas compression, acid-base neutralization reactions, and oxygen-containing organic reactions. The model is validated in terms of risk identification, path optimization, and strategy development using results from simulations and case studies. Results indicate that the model can dynamically identify the high-risk process pathways and conduct correlation analysis of the parameters. Decision outputs can be produced in the following scenarios: temperature control of the exothermic reactions, identification of the leakage risk zone, abnormal warning for high-pressure systems, pH drift control, and determination of explosion limits. Nevertheless, the model's application is restricted by the following: interpretability, data quality, interface compatibility, and regulatory integration. AI can assist with the integration of multiple data sources, identification of complex risks, and generation of design leads to integrate the multi-source data systems and complex risks. Its use is however determined by the particular process scenario. Engineering implementation will require improved model transparency, data harmonization, and system integration.

Key words: artificial intelligence (AI), inherent safety in chemical processes, inherent safety decision-making, typical process scenarios, applicability

中图分类号: