城市综合灾害风险双重组合评价方法

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.07.025

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 156-163.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.07.025

城市综合灾害风险双重组合评价方法

夏陈红^1,2, 王威^**1,2 副研究员, 马东辉^1,2 研究员, 苏经宇^1,2 研究员

1 北京工业大学建筑与城市规划学院,北京 100124;
2 北京工业大学抗震减灾研究所,北京 100124

收稿日期:2019-03-18 修回日期:2019-05-25 出版日期:2019-07-28 发布日期:2020-10-21
通讯作者: ** 王威(1981—),男,河南沈丘人,博士,副研究员,主要从事城乡安全与防灾减灾规划等方面的研究。E-mail: ieeww@bjut.edu.cn。
作者简介:夏陈红 (1992—),女,安徽安庆人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为安全与防灾规划研究。E-mail:1165968825@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51678017);国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFD1100902-1)。

Study on double combination evaluation method of urban comprehensive disaster risk

XIA Chenhong^1,2, WANG Wei^1,2, MA Donghui^1,2, SU Jingyu^1,2

1 College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2 Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2019-03-18 Revised:2019-05-25 Online:2019-07-28 Published:2020-10-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决不同单一方法在评价综合灾害风险方面存在的结果不一致性问题,提出一种基于排序值和评价值双重组合的评价方法。首先,选用7种典型单一方法评价中国31个省、自治区和直辖市(不含港、澳、台地区)的综合灾害风险,得出各方法的评价结果,并据此对城市综合灾害风险进行基础评价;然后,以KENDALL协和系数、Spearman等级相关系数和综合支持度系数为一致性检验标准,计算各单一评价法间的密切相关程度;其次,运用双重组合评价模型对单一评价结果进行组合评价并反复检验;最后,得出高度协调一致的综合灾害风险排序值和评价值。结果表明:双重组合的评价方法能够有效降低评估过程中的随机偏差和系统误差,得出高度收敛性和可信性的风险评价值和排序值更贴近实际。

关键词: 综合灾害风险, 一致性检验, 循环修正思想, 支持度概念, 双重组合模型

Abstract: In order to solve the problem of inconsistency in the evaluation results obtained by different single methods, an evaluation idea based on the combination of sequencing values and evaluation values was proposed. Firstly, seven typical single methods were used to evaluate the comprehensive disaster risks of 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government in China, and the basic evaluation of urban comprehensive disaster risk was carried out based on the evaluation results by each method. Then using KENDALL concordance coefficient, Spearman grade correlation coefficient and comprehensive support coefficient as criteria of consistency test, the close correlation degree between each single evaluation method was calculated. Besides, the double evaluation model was applied to combine the single evaluation results and repeat the tests. Finally, the highly coordinated ranking and evaluation values of comprehensive disaster risk were obtained. The results show that the dual combination evaluation method can effectively reduce the random deviation and systematic error in the evaluation process, and obtain the risk assessment value and ranking value of high convergence and credibility, which provides a new idea for the assessment of urban comprehensive disaster risk.

Key words: comprehensive disaster risk, consistency check, circular correction idea, support degree concept, double combination model

中图分类号:

X913.4

夏陈红, 王威, 马东辉, 苏经宇. 城市综合灾害风险双重组合评价方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 156-163.

XIA Chenhong, WANG Wei, MA Donghui, SU Jingyu. Study on double combination evaluation method of urban comprehensive disaster risk[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(7): 156-163.

参考文献

[1] RAMKUMAR M. On a sustainable future of the earth's natural resources [M]. Berlin:Heidelberg, Springer, 2016: 543-554.
[2] QIE Zijin,RONG Lili. An integrated relative risk assessment model for urban disaster loss in view of disaster system theory[J]. Natural Hazards, 2017, 88(1): 165-190.
[3] EHLERS E. From HDP to IHDP: evolution of the international human dimensions of global environmental change programme (1996-2014)[J].Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace, 2016,10: 359-376.
[4] AITSI-SELMI A, MURRAY V, WANNOUS C, et al. Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction[J].International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,2016,7(1): 1-29.
[5] 辜智慧,徐伟,葛怡,等.基于城市用地单元的自然灾害风险评估概念模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(4): 110-115.
GU Zhihui, XU Wei, GE Yi, et al. Conceptual model for natural disaster risk assessment based on urban land use unit [J].China Safety Science Journal,2012,22(4): 110-115.
[6] 张明媛,刘妍,袁永博.城市自然灾害综合风险评估问题研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2012,32(2): 176-180.
ZHANG Mingyuan, LIU Yan, YUAN Yongbo. Research on integrated risk evaluation on urban natural disaster[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2012, 32(2): 176-180.
[7] 颜峻,左哲.自然灾害风险评估指标体系及方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(11): 61-65.
YAN Jun, ZUO Zhe. Research on natural disaster risk assessment index system and method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(11): 61-65.
[8] 王威,苏经宇,马东辉,等.复杂灾害系统风险综合评价的非线性信息动力学模型[J].中国科学:技术科学,2013,43(1): 71-78.
WANG Wei, SU Jingyu, MA Donghui, et al. Integrated risk assessment of complex disaster system based on a non-linear information dynamics model[J].ScientiaSinica:Technologica,2013,43(1): 71-78.
[9] 吴开亚,金菊良,王文圣.基于集对分析的组合评价模型及其应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2013,43(3): 1-6.
WU Kaiya, JIN Juliang, WANG Wensheng. Combination evaluation model based on set pair analysis and its application[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2013,43(3): 1-6.
[10] 张发明,刘志平.组合评价方法研究综述[J].系统工程学报,2017,32(4): 557-569.
ZHANG Faming, LIU Zhiping. Combined evaluation methods: aliteraturereview[J].Journal of Systems Engineering,2017,32(4): 557-569.
[11] 薛锋,赵蕾.高速公路安全设施的改进模糊Borda组合评价方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(7): 165-171.
XUE Feng, ZHAO Lei. Improved fuzzy Borda combination evaluation method for highway safety facilities[J].China Safety Science Journal,2018,28(7): 165-171.
[12] 陈国宏,李美娟,陈衍泰. 组合评价及其计算机集成系统研究[M].北京: 清华大学出版社,2007: 100-180.
[13] 张明媛. 城市承灾能力及灾害综合风险评价研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2008.
ZHANG Mingyuan. Research on urban disaster-resisting capability and comprehensive risk assessment of disasters [D].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2008.
[14] 尹占娥. 城市自然灾害风险评估与实证研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.
YIN Zhane.Urban natural disaster risk assessment and empirical research [D].Shanghai:East China Normal University, 2009.
[15] 李浩鑫,邵东国,何思聪,等.基于循环修正的灌溉用水效率综合评价方法[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(5): 65-72.
LI Haoxin, SHAO Dongguo, HE Sicong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation method for irrigation-water use efficiency based on circulation-correction[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(5): 65-72.
[16] 夏陈红,王威,马东辉.城市综合灾害风险等级组合评价的SD模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2019, (4): 164-170.
XIA Chenhong, WANG Wei, MA Donghui. SD model of urban comprehensive disaster risk rank combination evaluation [J]. China Safety Science Journal.2019,(4): 164-170.

城市综合灾害风险双重组合评价方法

Study on double combination evaluation method of urban comprehensive disaster risk

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	余建星, 范海昭, 陈海成, 吴世博, 韩放, 刘少卿. 海洋立管失效风险因素分析方法及应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 47-53.
[2]	夏陈红, 王威, 马东辉. 城市综合灾害风险等级组合评价的SD模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 164-170.
[3]	刘超，罗云，仝世渝，李佳蓉. 基于层次分析法的电力企业员工安全素质测评指标体系研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(9): 132-.
[4]	贾水库，温晓虎，林大建，蒋仲安. 基于层次分析法地铁运营系统安全评价技术的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(5): 137-.