中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 164-170.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.04.026

• 公共安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市综合灾害风险等级组合评价的SD模型

夏陈红1,2, 王威1,2 副研究员, 马东辉1,2 研究员   

  1. 1 北京工业大学 建筑与城市规划学院,北京 100124;
    2 北京工业大学 抗震减灾研究所,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 修回日期:2019-02-21 出版日期:2019-04-28 发布日期:2020-11-04
  • 作者简介:夏陈红 (1992—),女,安徽安庆人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为安全与防灾规划。E-mail:1165968825@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(51678017);国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFD1100902-1)。

Urban comprehensive disaster risk level combination evaluation model based on support degree

XIA Chenhong1,2, WANG Wei1,2, MA Donghui1,2   

  1. 1 College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
    2 Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Revised:2019-02-21 Online:2019-04-28 Published:2020-11-04

摘要: 为更加系统地识别城市综合灾害风险,解决不同单一方法评价结果存在非一致性的问题,提出基于支持度(SD)概念的组合评价方法。以灾害危险性、经济社会易损性和城市设防为准则构建综合灾害风险评价指标体系,运用6种单一方法进行基础评价得出单一评价结果;运用向量夹角余弦和Euclidean距离分别计算不同方法评价结果的相似度矩阵和差异度矩阵,构建融合相似度和差异度的SD组合评价模型,并评价中国大陆31个省、直辖市和自治区的综合灾害风险。结果表明:SD模型能克服不同单一评价结果非一致性的问题,体现横向求同、纵向求异的组合新思想,使城市综合风险评价结果更加客观、合理,为深度识别城市综合灾害风险水平提供理论和实践依据。

关键词: 综合灾害风险, 组合评价法, 支持度(SD), 相似度, 差异度

Abstract: In order to identify urban comprehensive disaster risks more systematically and solve the problem of inconsistent evaluation results of different single methods, a combined evaluation method based on the concept of SD was proposed. Firstly, a comprehensive disaster risk evaluation index system was established based on the criteria of disaster risk, economic and social vulnerability and urban fortification, and six single methods were used for basic evaluation to obtain a single evaluation result. Then, the similarity matrix and the difference matrix of the evaluation results of different methods were calculated by vector included angle cosine and Euclidean distance respectively, and an SD combination evaluation model integrating similarity and difference was constructed to evaluate 31 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions in mainland China. The results show that SD model can well overcome the inconsistency of different single evaluation results and embody the new combination idea of "seeking common ground horizontally and seeking differences vertically", which makes the comprehensive urban risk evaluation results more objective and reasonable and provides theoretical and practical basis for in-depth identification of the comprehensive urban disaster risk level.

Key words: comprehensive disaster risk, combination evaluation method, support degree (SD), similarity, different degree

中图分类号: