联合站油气设备泄漏燃爆事故及危险区域识别*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.012

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 85-94.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.12.012

联合站油气设备泄漏燃爆事故及危险区域识别^*

谢伟康, 陈国明^** 教授, 师吉浩讲师, 杨冬冬

中国石油大学海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心,山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2021-09-28 修回日期:2021-11-15 出版日期:2021-12-28 发布日期:2022-06-28
通讯作者: **陈国明(1962—),男,浙江绍兴人,博士,教授,主要从事海洋油气工程及装备、油气安全工程方面的研究。E-mail: offshore@126.com。
作者简介:谢伟康 (1995—),男,山东济宁人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为火灾燃爆事故和风险预测。E-mail:xwk1995@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFC0802305);中国博士后科学基金资助(2019M662469);山东省自然科学基金资助(ZR2020KF018)。

Blast accidents caused by gas leakage and identification of hazardous areas in united stations

XIE Weikang, CHEN Guoming, SHI Jihao, YANG Dongdong

Center for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao Shandong 266580, China

Received:2021-09-28 Revised:2021-11-15 Online:2021-12-28 Published:2022-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究联合站油气设备在运行过程中因油气泄漏导致燃爆事故的灾难性后果,采用计算流体动力学(CFD)技术,构建联合站油气设备泄漏与燃爆事故后果预测与评估模型。首先,对不同天然气泄漏扩散场景开展数值模拟,分析各因素对天然气云扩散行为的影响;然后,基于可燃气云分布场景建立燃爆事故模型;最后,引入事故载荷伤害判别准则识别危险区域。结果表明:开放空间通风条件下,燃爆事故为气体泄漏连锁事故中的主要事故类型;天然气分布特性受泄漏速率、风速、障碍物等因素影响明显;池火在燃烧过程中受风力作用会发生明显的迁移现象;在设备拥塞度高的工艺区域内,火灾事故导致的热辐射危险区域面积通常大于高温危险区域面积,热辐射为主要伤害载荷。

关键词: 联合站, 油气设备, 泄漏扩散, 燃爆事故, 危险区域识别, 喷射火

Abstract: In order to explore catastrophic consequences of combustion and explosion accidents caused by leakage during operation of oil and gas equipment in united stations, a consequence prediction and evaluation model of the equipment was established by computational fluid dynamics technology. Firstly, numerical simulation was carried out for different gas leakage and dispersion scenarios, and effects of various factors on dispersion behavior of gas clouds were analyzed. Then, a combustion and explosion accident model was established based on distribution of combustible gas clouds. Finally, accidental load principle was introduced to identify hazardous areas. The results show that when open space is well ventilated, combustion and explosion accident are the major one in gas leakage chain accidents. Distribution of combustible gas clouds is significantly affected by factors such as leakage rate, wind speed, and obstacles. For pool fire, as it is influenced by wind, migration phenomenon will be observed during burning process. In places with high equipment congestion, area of heat radiation damage caused by fire accidents is usually larger than that of high temperature danger areas, and heat radiation is the main damage load.

Key words: united stations, oil and gas processing equipment, leakage and dispersion, combustion and explosion accidents, hazardous area identification, jet fire

中图分类号:

X932

谢伟康, 陈国明, 师吉浩, 杨冬冬. 联合站油气设备泄漏燃爆事故及危险区域识别^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 85-94.

XIE Weikang, CHEN Guoming, SHI Jihao, YANG Dongdong. Blast accidents caused by gas leakage and identification of hazardous areas in united stations[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 85-94.

参考文献

[1] 张鹏,范潮海,陈祥苏.油气集输站场个人风险矩阵叠加分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(3):129-136.
ZHANG Peng, FAN Chaohai, CHEN Xiangsu. Superposition analysis of individual risk matrix of oil and gas gathering and transportation station [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(3):129-136.
[2] 英国邦斯菲尔德油库爆炸火灾事故[EB/OL].(2013-02-07). http://www.safehoo.com/Case/Case/Blaze/201302/302648.shtml.
[3] 丁信伟,王淑兰,徐国庆.可燃及毒性气体泄漏扩散研究综述[J].化学工业与工程,1999,16(2):118-122.
DING Xinwei, WANG Shulan, XU Guoqing. A review of studies on the discharging dispersion of flammable and toxic gases [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering,1999,16(2):118-122.
[4] 冯志华,聂百胜.危险气体泄漏扩散的实验方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(7):18-23.
FENG Zhihua, NIE Baisheng. Experimental methodology for study diffusion of leaked hazardous gas [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2006,16(7):18-23.
[5] 肖峻峰,陈健,戴程呈,等.高含硫天然气泄漏爆炸与毒性影响因素分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(6):43-49.
XIAO Junfeng, CHEN Jian, DAI Chengcheng, et al. Influencing factors on explosion and toxicity of high-sulfur natural gas [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2020,30(6):43-49.
[6] BAALISAMPANG T, ABBASSI R, GARANIYA V, et al. Accidental release of liquefied natural gas in a processing facility: effect of equipment congestion level on dispersion behaviour of the flammable vapour[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2019,61:237-248.
[7] 曹杨,王红红,吕松松,等.危险性气体泄漏扩散研究方法对比[J].工业安全与环保,2021,47(1):17-21.
CAO Yang, WANG Honghong, LYU Songsong, et al. Comparison of research methods on hazardous gas leakage and diffusion[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection,2021,47(1):17-21.
[8] LUCAS M, SKJOLD T, HISKEN H. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of hydrogen releases and vented deflagrations in large enclosures[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2020,63: DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103999.
[9] 王建. 储罐区可燃气体泄漏扩散模拟及爆燃灾害评估[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2013.
WANG Jian. Numerical Simulation for the leakage diffusion of combustible gas and explosion hazards assessment in tank area [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2013.
[10] PASCULESCU V M, VLASIN N I, GHICIOI E, et al. New tools for estimating the extent of hazardous areas generated by gas leak explosions[J].Environmental Engineering and Management Journal,2019,18(4):889-900.
[11] 杨冬冬,陈国明,师吉浩.海洋平台井喷含硫天然气扩散危险区域研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(8):114-120.
YANG Dongdong, CHEN Guoming, SHI Jihao, Research on dangerous region of H₂S-containing natural gas diffusion resulting from offshore platform blowout[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(8):114-120.
[12] 檀聪明,陈国明,师吉浩,等. 基于FLACS的海洋平台喷射火事故后果分析[C].中国职业安全健康协会2016年学术年会论文集(上册),2016:408-414.
[13] 李云涛,张振永,刘玉卿,等.天然气管道全管径断裂事故影响范围研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(9):149-154.
LI Yuntao, ZHANG Zhenyong, LIU Yuqing, et al. Influence range of full bore rupture accidents of natural gas pipelines[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2020,30(9):149-154.
[14] 师吉浩. 海洋平台燃爆风险分析及抗爆减灾设计研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2018.
SHI Jihao. Research on explosion risk analysis and mitigation design of offshore platforms [D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2018.
[15] ARNTZEN B J. Modelling of turbulence and combustion for simulation of gas explosions in complex geometries [D]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway, 1998.
[16] 李兆慈,张文花,郑梅,等.LNG连续泄漏扩散过程模拟[J].化工学报,2015,66(增2):158-165.
LI Zhaoci, ZHANG Wenhua, ZHENG Mei, et al. LNG continuous leakage and diffusion process simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015,66(S2):158-165.
[17] 王志寰,李成兵,周宁.大型LNG接收站泄漏事故灾害效应分析与预测[J].天然气工业,2019,39(5):145-153.
WANG Zhihuan, LI Chengbing, ZHOU Ning, et al. Analysis and prediction on the disaster effect of leakage accidents at large LNG receiving stations [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(5):145-153.
[18] 杨冬冬,陈国明,师吉浩,等.海洋平台爆炸事故后果动态评估方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(11):121-126.
YANG Dongdong. CHEN Guoming, SHI Jihao, et al. A dynamic assessment method for consequences of explosion accidents on offshore platforms [J]. China Safety Science Journal,2020,30(11):121-126.
[19] 张玉乾. 油气站场泄漏油气火灾爆燃特性及三维定量风险分析研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东),2017.
ZHANG Yuqian. Study on fire and deflagration characteristics and three dimensional quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas station[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2017.
[20] 刘伟,李越.室外油池火燃烧特性实验研究与数值模拟[J].矿业科学学报,2020,5(3):302-310.
LIU Wei, LI Yue. Experimental study and numerical simulation on combustion characteristics of outdoor oil pool fire[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2020,5(3):302-310.
[21] 陈国华,吴家俊.地下密闭空间燃气爆炸冲击波传播规律[J].天然气工业,2017,37(2):120-125.
CHEN Guohua, WU Jiajun. Propagation laws of gas explosion shock waves in underground confined space [J]. Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(2):120-125.
[22] 魏超南,陈国明,刘康.浮式生产系统泄漏天然气爆燃特性与安全区域[J].石油学报,2014,35(4):786-794.
WEI Chaonan, CHEN Guoming, LIU Kang. Leakage gas deflagration characteristics and safety area of FPSO [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(4): 786-794.
[23] 安超,李磊,张爱良,等.基于FLACS CFD的不同气油比油气混输管道泄漏火灾后果对比[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(6):67-73.
AN Chao, LI Lei, ZHANG Ailiang, et al. Comparison of consequences caused by leakage fire of oil-gas mixed transmission pipeline with different gas-oil ratios based on FLACS CFD [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2019,15(6):67-73.

联合站油气设备泄漏燃爆事故及危险区域识别^*

Blast accidents caused by gas leakage and identification of hazardous areas in united stations

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周宁, 吴露露, 李雪, 李徐伟, 时静洁, 曹林林. 喷射火环境下石化管廊管道失效特征试验研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 135-141.
[2]	何乐平, 唐爽, 胡启军, 蔡其杰, 石仁丹. 综合管廊天然气泄漏扩散及监控方法优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 43-50.
[3]	邓康, 张英, 徐伯乐, 马出原, 牛奕. 磷酸铁锂电池组燃烧特性研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 83-88.
[4]	田宇忠, 范洪军, 涂环, 李俊荣. 考虑多米诺效应的LNG事故后果定量风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 68-73.
[5]	张媛媛, 黄有波, 吕淑然. 矩形泄漏孔水平喷射火热辐射研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(6): 73-78.
[6]	黄勇，解立峰，鲁长波，安高军. 聚能射流引爆柴油的试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(6): 63-.
[7]	蒋晓刚，迟卫，刘晓光，苑志江. 喷射火双向人工扰流脱火的可控参数试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 51-.
[8]	康青春，孙沛，王淮斌，李玉. 液化石油气喷射火灾热辐射估算方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(11): 16-.
[9]	王洪德，莫朝霞. 基于高斯模型的液氨储罐泄漏扩散仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(9): 31-.
[10]	陈文江，陈国华. 基于虚拟现实技术的喷射火事故三维动态仿真及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(3): 32-.
[11]	颜伟文，韩光胜. 平板模型对液化石油气连续泄漏扩散模拟分析与探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(11): 56-.
[12]	傅智敏，黄金印，付敏. 烃类流体火灾伤害破坏作用定量分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(9): 29-.
[13]	张乃禄，赵晓姣，徐竟天，郭小平. 原油集输联合站故障树分析研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(3): 143-.
[14]	姜春明，姜巍巍，李奇，黄贤滨，李俊杰. 乙炔干燥变温吸附装置安全性分析与燃爆事故预防对策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(12): 109-.
[15]	吴起，蒋军成. 基于BP神经网络技术的实验数据分析处理[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(1): 39-.