云南省森林火灾风险综合评价及空间格局研究*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.023

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 167-173.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.09.023

云南省森林火灾风险综合评价及空间格局研究^*

龙腾腾¹ 讲师, 殷继艳² 副教授, 欧朝蓉³ 副教授, 杨强² 讲师, 李勇² 副教授, 王秋华^**1 教授

1 西南林业大学土木工程学院,云南昆明 650024;
2 中国消防救援学院消防工程系, 北京 102202;
3 西南林业大学地理与生态旅游学院,云南昆明 650024

收稿日期:2021-06-12 修回日期:2021-08-16 出版日期:2021-09-28 发布日期:2022-03-28
通讯作者: ** 王秋华(1978—),男,福建长汀人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事森林防火等方面的研究。E-mail:qhwang2010@163.com。
作者简介:龙腾腾 (1984—),女,湖南株洲人,硕士,讲师,主要从事森林火灾评估等方面的研究。E-mail:81394069@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC1511600);国家自然科学基金资助(31960318);云南省教育厅自然科学基金资助(2020J0421)。

Comprehensive assessment and spatial pattern study on forest fire risk in Yunnan Province

LONG Tengteng¹, YIN Jiyan², OU Zhaorong³, YANG Qiang², LI Yong², WANG Qiuhua¹

1 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming Yunnan 650024, China;
2 Department of Fire Engineering, China Fire and Rescue Institute, Beijing 102202, China;
3 School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming Yunnan 650024, China

Received:2021-06-12 Revised:2021-08-16 Online:2021-09-28 Published:2022-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为有效揭示森林火灾风险的空间异质性和关联性,给林火防控资源配置和区域联动提供科学参考,综合考虑自然因素和人为因素,利用熵权法和综合指数法评估云南省森林火灾风险,继而利用空间自相关模型,分析森林火灾风险的空间格局。研究结果表明:云南省西部森林火灾风险高于东部地区,绝大部分地区处于较高风险和高风险等级,尤其是滇西北、滇西和滇中地区;火灾风险趋势线有2条,1条从云南省的西北部沿着中部延伸到东北部,呈现出两端高中间低的态势,另1条呈现南北低,中间高的态势;火灾风险在空间上呈现出空间集聚特征,但显著程度一般,森林火灾风险的局部相关性较弱。

关键词: 森林火灾, 风险综合评价, 空间格局, 自然因素, 人为因素

Abstract: In order to effectively reveal spatial heterogeneity and relevance of forest fire risk, and provide a scientific reference for allocation and regional linkage of fire prevention and control resources,take the natural factors and the human factors into consideration comprehensively,entropy method and comprehensive index method were used to assess forest fire risk in Yunnan province. Then, spatial pattern of the risk was studied by utilizing spatial auto correlation model. The results show that the risk of forest fire in western Yunnan is higher than that in the east, and most areas feature higher risk and high risk level, especially in northwest, west and central part. There are two fire risk trend lines, one extending from the northwest along the middle part to the northeast, which demonstrates a trend of high at both ends and low in the middle. The other one is low in the north and south, and high in the middle. The fire risk shows spatial agglomeration in space, but its degree of significance is average with weak local correlation.

Key words: forest fire, comprehensive risk assessment, spatial pattern, natural factors, human factors

中图分类号:

X913.4

龙腾腾, 殷继艳, 欧朝蓉, 杨强, 李勇, 王秋华. 云南省森林火灾风险综合评价及空间格局研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 167-173.

LONG Tengteng, YIN Jiyan, OU Zhaorong, YANG Qiang, LI Yong, WANG Qiuhua. Comprehensive assessment and spatial pattern study on forest fire risk in Yunnan Province[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 167-173.

参考文献

[1] 蒋琴,钟少波,朱伟.京津冀地区森林火灾综合风险评估[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(10):119-125.
JIANG Qin,ZHONG Shaobo, ZHU Wei. Research on comprehensive risk assessment of forest fire in Beiing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(10):119-125.
[2] 高超,林红蕾,胡海清,等.我国林火发生预测模型研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(9):3 227-3 240.
GAO Chao,LIN Honglei, HU Haiqing, et al. A review of models of forest fire occurrence prediction in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(9):3 227-3 240.
[3] 田晓瑞,代玄,王明玉,等.多气候情景下中国森林火灾风险评估[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(3):769-776.
TIAN Xiaorui,DAI Xuan, WANG Mingyu, et al. Forest fire risk assessment for China under different climate secenarios[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(3):769-776.
[4] 苏立娟,何友均,陈绍志.1950—2010年中国森林火灾时空特征及风险分析[J].林业科学,2015,51(1):88-96.
SU Lijuan,HE Youjun, CHEN Shaozhi. Temporal and spatial characteristics and risk analysis of forest fire in China from 1950 to 2010[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015,51(1):88-96.
[5] 徐宏伟,邱天琦,刘斯文,等.加拿大林火研究与管理的思考与启示[J].林业资源管理,2017(4):155-158.
XU Hongwei,QIU Tianqi, LIU Siwen, et al. Thought on Canada forest fire research and management[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2017(4):155-158.
[6] 邹志翀,冷红.澳大利亚森林火灾风险相关研究进展及其启示[J].国际城市规划,2018,33(3):62-71.
ZOU Zhichong,LENG Hong. State-of-the-art of Australian bushfire risk researches and its enlightenment[J]. Urban Planning Internationnal, 2018,33(3):62-71.
[7] CHUVIECO E,AGUADO I,JURDAO S, et al.Integrating geospatial information into fire risk assessment[J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire,2013,23:606-619.
[8] 李童瑶,陈馨,邓晶,等.基于聚类分析的福建省森林火灾风险区划[J].福建林业科技,2015,42(4):148-152.
LI Tongyao,CHEN Xin, DENG Jing, et al. Zoning of forest fire risk gread of Fujian province based on hierachical clustering analysis[J].Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2015,42(4):148-152.
[9] 吴柳萍,何东进,洪伟,等.基于改进突变级数法的中国森林火灾评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2017,45(8):95-102.
WU Liuping,HE Dongjin, HONG Wei, et al. Assessment of forest fires in China based on improved catastrophe progression method[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2017,45(8):95-102.
[10] 王双,张贵,谭三清,等.基于空间Logistic的湖南省森林火灾风险评价[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2020,40(9):88-95.
WANG Shuang,ZHANG Gui, TAN Sanqing, et al. Assessment of forest fire in Hunan province based on spatial Logistic model[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2020,40(9):88-95.
[11] 蔡奇均,曾爱聪,苏漳文,等.基于Logistic回归模型的浙江省林火发生驱动因子分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2020,48(2):102-108.
CAI Qijun,ZENG Aicong, SU Zhangwen, et al. Driving factors of forest fire in Zhejiang province based on Logistic regression mdel[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2020,48(2):102-108.
[12] 乔泽宇,房磊,张悦楠,等.2001—2017年我国森林火灾时空分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(1):55-64.
QIAO Zeyu,FANG Lei, ZHANG Yuenan,et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of forest fires in China between 2001 and 2017[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(1):55-64.
[13] 王周.云南省林草火险空间模拟和等级评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2020,44(2):141-149.
WANG Zhou. Spatial modeling and grade evaluation of forest and grass fire danger in Yunan province[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2020,44(2):141-149.
[14] 孙威,韦善阳,田筱,等.贵州少数民族村寨火灾风险综合评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(10):126-133.
SUN Wei,WEI Shanyang, TIAN Xiao, et al. Comprehensive fire risk assessment of Guizhou minority villages[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(10):126-133.
[15] 龙腾腾,高仲亮,刘岳峰,等.基于AHP-PCAM模型的安宁市森林火灾社会脆弱性评价[J].西南林业大学学报:自然科学版,2018,38(2):153-157.
LONG Tengteng,GAO Zhongliang, LIU Yuefeng, et al. Risk assessment on social vulnerability of forest fire in An'ning based on AHP-PCA[J].Journal of Southwest Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2018,38(2):153-157.
[16] SEVINCA V,KUCUKB O,GOLTASC M.A Bayesian network model for prediction and analysis of possible forest fire causes[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2020,31(4):117-123.
[17] 杜军威,于洋洋,胡强,等. 安全管理水平量化评估指标权重优化方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1):168-172.
DU Junwei,YU Yangyang, HU Qiang,et al. A method for optimizing index weight in quantitative evaluation of safety management level[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(1):168-172.
[18] 王爱,张强,陆林,等. 多源数据支持下城市火灾风险评估及规划响应[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3):148-155.
WANG Ai,ZHANG Qiang, LU Lin,et al. Urban fire risk assessment and planning response based on multi-source data[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021,31(3):148-155.
[19] 许东阳,任永泰,成琨. 区域水土资源生态安全指标的筛选与应用[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(2):210-214.
XU Dongyang,REN Yongtai, CHENG Kun. Screening and application of ecological security indicators for regional soil and water resources[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2019,42(2):210-214.
[20] 马艳. 长江经济带城镇化与生态环境耦合协调效应测度与交互胁迫关系验证[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020,29(2):275-285.
MA Yan.Examing the coupling degree and interactive stress between Urbanization and Eco-Environment in Yangtze river economic belt[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020,29(2):275-285.
[21] OU Zhaorong, ZHU Qingke, SUN Yongyu, et al. Regional ecological security and diagnosis of obstacle factors in underdeveloped regions: a case study in Yunnan province, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Sciences, 2017,14(5):870-884.
[22] 欧朝蓉,朱清科,包广静. 滇中县域人口城镇化空间结构及影响因素研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2016, 37(6):1 173-1 180.
OU Zhaorong, ZHU Qingke,BAO Guangjing.Spatial structure and influencing factors of population urbanization in the central Yunan province[J].Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2016,37(6):1 173-1 180.

云南省森林火灾风险综合评价及空间格局研究^*

Comprehensive assessment and spatial pattern study on forest fire risk in Yunnan Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡韫频, 李超, 李宗亮, 杨道合. 大跨度钢结构施工安全风险评价IHFACS-BN模型及应用^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 147-154.
[2]	王军武, 王梦雨, 刘登辉, 吴寒, 胡蝶. 基于HFACS-BN的地铁车站施工高处坠落可能性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 90-98.
[3]	董磊, 刘嘉琛, 赵长啸, 党香俊, 史春蕾. 显示触控系统人为因素适航符合性验证技术[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 63-68.
[4]	蒋琴, 钟少波副, 朱伟. 京津冀地区森林火灾综合风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 119-125.
[5]	许素睿. 基于HFACS的电梯事故人因分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(7): 70-75.
[6]	张博立，项恒. 民机事故统计数据在飞行员差错因果分析中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 114-.
[7]	梁曼，徐肖豪，邹少孚. 基于模糊BN和SHELLO模型的管制人为因素安全风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(11): 126-.
[8]	孔令铮. 交通事故致因中的人为因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(1): 28-.
[9]	刘敏，汪明. 森林火灾灾情快速预判模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(5): 59-.
[10]	李涛，蒋英杰，孙志强，宫二玲，谢红卫. 航空维修差错模式及差错成因的灰色关联分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(2): 85-.
[11]	宋泽阳，任建伟，程红伟，齐文宇，贾宁. 煤矿安全管理体系缺失和不安全行为研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(11): 128-.
[12]	向维，李明，吴超，王黎静. 航空不安全事件人为因素分析R-S-TER模型的构建与应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(2): 152-.
[13]	郑文勇，张静伟，潘茗. 考虑人为因素的可靠性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(10): 26-.
[14]	张凤，于广涛，李永娟，蒋丽，董雷. 影响我国民航飞行安全的个体与组织因素——基于HFACS框架的事件分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(10): 67-.
[15]	杜红兵，李珍香. 进近着陆运输飞行事故原因及预防对策研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(6): 118-.