基于三维框架的中国安全生产政策分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.0411

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 31-37.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.11.0411

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

基于三维框架的中国安全生产政策分析

南锐(), 朱文俊

中国矿业大学(北京) 文法学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2022-05-22 修回日期:2022-09-13 出版日期:2022-11-28 发布日期:2023-05-28
作者简介:
南锐 (1984—),男,湖北黄冈人,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事公共安全与应急管理方面的研究。E-mail:201435@cumtb.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助(18CGL033); 北京市社会科学基金资助(20GLC044)

Analysis of China's work safety policy based on 3D framework

NAN Rui(), ZHU Wenjun

School of Law and Humanities, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2022-05-22 Revised:2022-09-13 Online:2022-11-28 Published:2023-05-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为厘清改革开放以来我国安全生产政策的变迁规律和发展趋势,推进安全生产治理体系和治理能力现代化,选取中央政府发布的852份政策,构建政策时间、政策目标和政策工具的三维框架,量化分析我国安全生产政策。结果表明:改革开放以来,我国安全生产政策先后经历了单向治理、综合治理和人本治理3个时期,不同时期政策呈现出不同变迁特征与演化规律;安全生产政策目标经历了“问题—目标—价值”的导向变迁;政策工具经历了“重权威监管轻能力培育”到“权威监管与能力培育并重”再到“多维目标协同”的变迁;安全生产不同时期具有不同政策目标,政策工具的选择偏好也有所不同。

关键词: 安全生产政策, 三维框架, 政策时间, 政策目标, 政策工具

Abstract:

In order to clarify the changing pattern and development trend of China's work safety policy since the reform and opening up, and to promote the modernization of the work safety governance system and capacity, a three-dimensional framework of policy time, policy objectives and policy tools was constructed to quantitatively analyze by selecting 852 policies issued by the central government. The results show that since the reform and opening up, the work safety policy has experienced the period of one-way governance, comprehensive governance and people-oriented governance, and the policy in different periods show different changing characteristics and evolution laws. The goal of work safety policy has experienced the change of "problem-goal-value" orientation. Policy tools have experienced changes from "emphasizing authority supervision over ability cultivation" to "paying equal attention to authority supervision and ability cultivation" and then to "multi-dimensional goal coordination". Work safety has different policy goals and preferences for policy tools in different periods.

Key words: work safety policy, 3D framework, policy time, policy objectives, policy tools

南锐, 朱文俊. 基于三维框架的中国安全生产政策分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(11): 31-37.

NAN Rui, ZHU Wenjun. Analysis of China's work safety policy based on 3D framework[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(11): 31-37.

图/表 5

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 16

[1]	曾毅, 李月军. 政策执行过程中的否决点问题:以煤炭安全生产管理为例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013(2):95-99.
	ZENG Yi, LI Yuejun. Veto point problems in China's policy implementing process:a case study of the coal production safety regulation[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2013(2):95-99.
[2]	秦德智, 马彩辉. 安全生产中的控制力与创新力[J]. 统计与决策, 2007(2):109-111.
[3]	汤道路. 安全生产的市场推进机制及其法律保障[J]. 学海, 2015(6):38-43.
[4]	刘素霞, 程瑶, 梅强, 等. 工业园区企业安全生产达标策略选择演化研究:基于溢出效应视角[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(12):3284-3297. doi: 10.12011/SETP2019-0542
	LIU Suxia, CHENG Yao, MEI Qiang, et al. Research on the evolution of strategy choice for work safety of enterprises in the industrial park:from the perspective of spillover effect[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(12):3284-3297.
[5]	李双燕, 万迪昉, 史亚蓉. 公共安全生产事故的产生与防范:政企合谋视角的解析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2009, 6(2):43-49,124.
	LI Shuangyan, WAN Difang, SHI Yarong. The occurrence and precaution of public safety production accidents:an explanation from the view of collusion between government and enterprises[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2009, 6(2):43-49,124.
[6]	宋守信, 陈明利, 翟怀远. 反脆弱机制在安全风险管控中的策略研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12):8-15. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.002
	SONG Shouxin, CHEN Mingli, ZHAI Huaiyuan. Research on strategy of antifragile mechanism in safety risk management[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(12):8-15. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.002
[7]	王凡凡. 挂牌督办改善地方安全生产治理效果了吗?基于双重差分法的实证检验[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021, 14(1):191-216,225.
	WANG Fanfan. Does the publicly supervised handling improve the effect of local safety production governance?empirical analysis based on the difference in differences method[J]. Journal of Public Administration, 2021, 14(1):191-216,225.
[8]	梅强, 张菁菁, 刘素霞, 等. 安全评价制度目标偏离的形成机理研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(5):216-225.
	MEI Qiang, ZHANG Jingjing, LIU Suxia, et al. Formation mechanism of objective deviation in the process of the safety evaluation system[J]. Management Review, 2017(5):216-225.
[9]	陈述, 任亚萍, 席炎, 等. 动态惩罚机制下企业安全生产行为演化分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1):51-57. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.007
	CHEN Shu, REN Yaping, XI Yan, et al. Evolutionary analysis on work safety behavior in firms under dynamic punishment mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1):51-57. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.007
[10]	张菁菁, 梅强, 刘素霞, 等. 安全生产评价服务市场违规防治演化研究[J]. 系统工程, 2018, 36(7):123-133.
	ZHANG Jingjing, MEI Qiang, LIU Suxia. Evolutionary study on violation prevention in work-safety-evaluation-service market[J]. Systems Engineering, 2018, 36(7):123-133.
[11]	朱桂龙, 杨小婉, 江志鹏. 层面-目标-工具三维框架下我国协同创新政策变迁研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(13):110-117.
	ZHU Guilong, YANG Xiaowan, JIANG Zhipeng. A study for the changes of collaborative innovation policy based on three-dimensional framework of level-goal-tool[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2018, 35(13):110-117.
[12]	苏靖. 关于促进自主创新政策落实的若干思考[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012(2):5-7.
	SU Jing. Considerations of promoting the implementation of innovation policy[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2012(2):5-7.
[13]	陈振明. 政策科学:公共政策分析导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2004:170.
[14]	ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W. An assessment of government innovation policies[J]. Review of Policy Research, 1984, 3(3/4):436-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00138.x
[15]	MCDONNELL L M, ELMORE R F. Getting the job done:alternative policy instruments[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1987, 9(2):133-152. doi: 10.3102/01623737009002133
[16]	彭忠益, 高峰. 政策工具视角下中国矿产资源安全政策文本量化研究[J]. 中南大学学报:社会科学版, 2021, 27(5):11-24.
	PENG Zhongyi, GAO Feng. Policy tool-based textual quantitative analysis on China's mineral resource safety policies[J]. Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences, 2021, 27(5):11-24.

工具类型	子工具名称	小计	占比/ %	总占比/%
命令型	法规管制	1 056	9.2	38.8
	监督检查	2 447	21.4
	生产责任	934	8.2
激励型	奖励	164	1.4	3.3
激励型	惩罚	221	1.9	3.3
能力建设型	宣教培训	1 419	12.4	55.9
	信息与技术	300	2.6
	人财物支持	696	6.1
	制度建设	1 069	9.3
	组织支持	2 922	25.5
系统变化型	机构调整	145	1.3	1.9
系统变化型	人员调整	73	0.6	1.9
合计	—	11 446	100	100

基于三维框架的中国安全生产政策分析

Analysis of China's work safety policy based on 3D framework

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 16

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价