穿戴经验对飞机救生衣穿戴的影响分析

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0758

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 206-213.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0758

穿戴经验对飞机救生衣穿戴的影响分析

杨瑞梁¹(), 李玲一², 张智俊², 朱尚毅¹

¹ 天津工业大学航空航天学院,天津 300387
² 天津工业大学机械工程学院,天津 300387

收稿日期:2022-08-28 修回日期:2022-11-18 出版日期:2023-01-28 发布日期:2023-07-28
作者简介:
杨瑞梁 (1977—),男,河南南阳人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事飞机运维新材料新工艺及其检测理论与技术的研究。E-mail:yangruiliang2001@sina.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(U1933111)

Analysis of influence of wearing experience on wearing of life preservers for aviation

YANG Ruiliang¹(), LI Lingyi², ZHANG Zhijun², ZHU Shangyi¹

¹ School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
² School of Mechanical Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2022-08-28 Revised:2022-11-18 Online:2023-01-28 Published:2023-07-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为更好地分析穿戴经验对航空救生衣穿戴的影响,搭建航空座椅平台,选用32名学生分别进行5次救生衣穿戴试验,分析该穿戴试验的合格穿戴情况,将每人的穿戴过程分段计时,使用SPSS软件研究对5次穿戴试验的穿戴总时间、取包时间、拆包时间和纯穿戴时间进行配对样本T检验,分析其前后2次穿戴的时间差异。结果表明:随穿戴次数的增加,穿戴总时间及每一步骤的平均时间都会在一定程度上下降,其中第2次相对于第1次的下降最为明显,且穿戴总时间及每一步骤与第1次相比均存在显著性差异;第3次试验后,穿戴总时间及每一步骤虽有下降但程度较弱;在下一次修订《航空用气胀式救生衣》时,建议增加取包、拆包等要求,且取包与拆包时间不应该包括在穿救生衣时间内,建议其时间分别规定为4和9 s,使飞机救生衣穿戴要求更为完善、更合乎实际情况。

关键词: 穿戴经验, 飞机救生衣, 穿戴总时间, 配对样本T检验, 显著性差异

Abstract:

In order to better analyze the impact of wearing experience on the wearing of aviation life preservers, the author built an aviation seat platform, selected 32 students to wear life preserver for five times respectively, the wearing situation were analyzed, and each person's wearing process was timed in segments. The SPSS software was used to study the total wearing time, bag collecting time, unpacking time and pure wearing time of the five wearing tests for paired sample T test. The time difference between the two wearing tests, before and after, was analyzed. The results show that with the increase of wearing times, the total time of wearing and the average time of each step decreased to some extent, and the decrease of the second time was the most obvious compared with the first time, and the total time of wearing and each step had significant differences compared with the first time. After the third test, the total wearing time and each step decreased but the degree was weak. In the next revision of Inflatable life preservers for aviation, it is recommended to add requirements of bag taking and unpacking, and the time of them should not be included in the time of wearing life preservers, and it is recommended that the time be specified as 4 s and 9 s respectively, so that the requirements for wearing aircraft life jackets are more complete and more realistic.

Key words: wearing experience, life preservers for aviation, total time of wearing, paired sample T test, significant difference

杨瑞梁, 李玲一, 张智俊, 朱尚毅. 穿戴经验对飞机救生衣穿戴的影响分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 206-213.

YANG Ruiliang, LI Lingyi, ZHANG Zhijun, ZHU Shangyi. Analysis of influence of wearing experience on wearing of life preservers for aviation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(1): 206-213.

图/表 11

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

表8

参考文献 16

[1]	AS 1354^TM, Individual inflatable life preserver[S]. 2016.
[2]	YANG Ruiliang, WANG Lijing, ZHOU Chi, et al. Life preservers: concepts, progress, and challenges[J]. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 2020, 30 (3/4):77-88. doi: 10.1080/24721840.2020.1742123
[3]	YANG Ruiliang, YANG Libin, ZHAO Lina, et al. Distribution and risk factors of water-related accidents for general aviation aircraft[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021:DOI:10.1155/2021/8812881. doi: 10.1155/2021/8812881
[4]	陆杰欢, 杨爱慧, 杨瑞梁, 等. 航空用气胀式救生衣的穿戴时间测试[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 167-172. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.02.023
	LU Jiehuan, YANG Aihui, YANG Ruiliang, et al. Experiment on donning time of inflatable aviation life preserve[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(2): 167-172. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.02.023
[5]	YANG Ruiliang, YANG Libin, WANG Lijing, et al. Life quality index based cost-benefit analysis of equipping life preservers aboard airplanes[J]. Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021, 235(15): 2157-2164.
[6]	National Transportation Safety Board NTSB. Loss of thrust in both engines after encountering a flock of birds and subsequent ditching on the Hudson river[R], 2012.
[7]	CORBETT C L, WEED D B, RUPPEL D J, et al. Inflatable emergency equipment I: evaluation of individual inflatable aviation life preserver donning tests[R]. Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
[8]	GB/T 36508—2018,航空用气胀式救生衣[S].
	GB/T 36508-2018, Inflatable life preservers for aviation[S].
[9]	TSO-C13g,Life preservers[S]. 2017.
[10]	CORBETT C L, MCLEAN G A, COSPER D K. Effective presentation media for passenger safety I: comprehension of briefing card pictorials and pictograms[R]. Federal Aviation Administration, 2008.
[11]	CHITTARO L, CORBETT C L, MCLEAN G A, et al. Safety knowledge transfer through mobile virtual reality: a study of aviation life preserver donning[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 102: 159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.012
[12]	LEE C, WANG S W, HSU M K, et al. Air passenger's perception toward pre-flight safety briefing videos: does it matter[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018, 72: 20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.07.004
[13]	CHITTARO L A. Comparative study of aviation safety briefing media: card,video,and video with interactive controls[J]. Transportation Research,Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 85: 415-428. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.007
[14]	YANG Ruiliang, WU Zijiang, QIAN Xiaoming. Evaluating the influential factors for life preserver donning tests[EB/OL]. (2021-02-08). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246705.
[15]	MOLESWORTH B R C. Examining the effectiveness of pre-flight cabin safety announcements in commercial aviation[J]. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2014, 24(4): 300-314. doi: 10.1080/10508414.2014.949511
[16]	TSO-C13f,Life preservers[S]. 1992.

标准号	GB /T 36508 —2018^[8]	TSO-C13g^[9]
项目	穿救生衣(包括拆救生衣包装)	穿救生衣(包括拆救生衣包装)	拆救生衣包装
合格穿戴的要求	被试应 25 s内从包中取出并穿上救生衣	被试能够在无人协助情况下,25 s内从包中取出并穿上救生衣	拆包时间不多于7 s
开始计时时间	被试双手放在包好的救生衣上	被试双手放在包好的救生衣上	被试的双手放在袋子上,准备打开
结束计时时间	被试正确穿好、固定,并调节合身为止	被试正确穿好、固定,并调节合身为止	救生衣包装被完全打开,袋子被完全移除

项目	穿救生衣时间 (包括拆包时间)			拆包时间
次数	均值/ s	75分位值/s	标准差	均值/ s	75分位值/s	标准差
1	52.16	63.00	19.57	11.91	14.00	5.62
2	29.81	36.00	10.06	7.44	9.00	2.84
3	25.59	30.50	7.39	6.47	7.50	2.84
4	24.56	27.50	7.47	6.50	8.00	2.74
5	20.59	25.00	5.28	4.97	6.00	1.96

变量	配对差值				t	Sig.(双尾)
	均值	标准差	差值 95% 置信区间
	均值	标准差					下限	上限
第1和2次	22.34	18.90	15.53	29.16	6.69	0.00
第2和3次	4.22	10.36	0.48	7.96	2.30	0.03
第3和4次	1.03	8.81	-2.14	4.21	0.66	0.51
第4和5次	3.97	6.63	1.58	6.36	3.39	0.00

变量	配对差值				t	Sig.(双尾)
	均值	标准差	差值 95% 置信区间
	均值	标准差					下限	上限
第1和2次	0.88	1.41	0.37	1.38	3.51	0.001
第2和3次	0.38	0.87	0.06	0.69	2.44	0.021
第3和4次	0.06	0.84	-0.24	0.37	0.42	0.677
第4和5次	0.34	0.75	0.08	0.61	2.61	0.014

性别	男			女
次数	均值	75分位值/s	标准差	均值	75分位值/s	标准差
1	11.76	14.50	6.71	12.06	14.00	4.28
2	7.29	9.00	3.53	7.60	9.00	1.88
3	6.24	7.25	3.17	6.73	7.75	2.49
4	5.35	6.25	2.06	7.80	8.75	2.88
5	4.18	6.00	1.70	5.87	6.75	1.88

穿戴经验对飞机救生衣穿戴的影响分析

Analysis of influence of wearing experience on wearing of life preservers for aviation

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 16

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

变量	男配对差值		t	Sig.(双尾)	女配对差值		t	Sig.(双尾)
变量	均值	标准差	t	Sig.(双尾)	均值	标准差	t	Sig.(双尾)
第1次和第2次	4.47	5.85	3.15	0.006	4.47	4.50	3.84	0.002
第2次和第3次	1.06	2.90	1.50	0.152	0.87	2.80	1.20	0.250
第3次和第4次	0.88	3.28	1.11	0.283	-1.07	4.02	-1.03	0.322
第4次和第5次	1.18	2.04	2.38	0.030	1.93	2.81	2.66	0.019

变量	配对差值		t	Sig. (双尾)
变量	均值	标准差	t	Sig. (双尾)
男第1次和女第1次	0.00	9.91	0.00	1.000
男第2次和女第2次	-0.07	4.74	-0.05	0.957
男第3次和女第3次	-0.73	4.73	-0.60	0.558
男第4次和女第4次	-2.40	3.25	-2.86	0.013
男第5次和女第5次	-1.87	2.42	-2.99	0.010

变量	配对差值				t	Sig.(双尾)
	均值	标准差	差值 95% 置信区间
	均值	标准差					下限	上限
第1和2次	17.75	16.20	11.91	23.59	6.20	0.000
第2和3次	3.19	9.14	-0.11	6.48	1.97	0.057
第3和4次	1.34	6.88	-1.14	3.82	1.11	0.278
第4和5次	2.28	5.52	0.29	4.27	2.34	0.026