中国安全科学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 256-262.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2026.09.0265

• 职业健康 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多模态生理指标融合的消防员体力疲劳状态分析

管浩森(), 郑欣, 王焕   

  1. 东北大学 资源与土木工程学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110819
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-18 修回日期:2026-07-22 出版日期:2026-10-20
  • 作者简介:

    管浩森 (1999—),男,辽宁葫芦岛人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为安全人机。E-mail:。

    郑 欣 副教授

Analysis of firefighters' physical fatigue based on fusion of multimodal physiological indicators

Guan Haosen(), Zheng Xin, Wang Huan   

  1. School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang Liaoning 110819, China
  • Received:2026-05-18 Revised:2026-07-22 Published:2026-10-20

摘要:

为精准分析消防员体力疲劳状态,降低训练损伤风险、提升应急救援效能,首先,以 18 名消防员为研究对象,通过日常训练诱导体力疲劳,结合主观问卷得分与时间感知平均相对误差验证疲劳诱导有效性;然后,采集疲劳前后心率变异性(HRV)、眼动、皮电、肌电4类生理指标,经功效分析、t 检验、秩和检验及BH矫正筛选显著差异指标,并采用最小冗余最大相关(mRMR)算法,完成核心特征优选;最后,基于多模态融合策略构建单、双、三、四模态疲劳状态分析模型,并采用逻辑回归(LR)、K近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)、自适应提升(AB)、随机森林(RF)5种机器学习算法,开展分析验证。结果表明:心率变异性(HRV)为最优单模态分析指标;多模态融合分析效果显著优于单一模态,肌电、HRV、眼动三模态为最佳融合组合;逻辑回归模型识别准确率达91.4%、平均准确率为88.7%,可高效精准判定消防员体力疲劳状态。

关键词: 模态, 生理指标, 消防员, 体力疲劳, 机器学习

Abstract:

To accurately identify physical fatigue in firefighters, lower training injury risks, boost emergency rescue efficiency, 18 firefighters were selected as research subjects. Physical fatigue was induced via routine training. The effectiveness of fatigue induction was verified with subjective questionnaire scores and the mean relative error of time perception. Four types of physiological signals, including heart rate variability(HRV), eye movement, electrodermal activity(EDA) and electromyography (EMG), were synchronously collected before and after fatigue. Fourteen significantly different indicators were screened via power analysis, t-test, rank-sum test and Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction. Core features were optimized and selected using the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm. Single-modal, dual-modal, trimodal and four-modal fatigue recognition models were built under the multimodal fusion strategy. Recognition verification was implemented by five algorithms: Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Boosting (AB) and Random Forest (RF). Result shows that heart rate variability (HRV) serves as the optimal single-modal recognition indicator. Multimodal fusion delivers obviously better recognition performance than the single-modal approach. The trimodal combination of EMG + HRV + eye movement acts as the optimal fusion scheme. The Logistic Regression model achieves a recognition accuracy of 91.4% and an average accuracy of 88.7%. It can judge firefighters' physical fatigue states efficiently and accurately.

Key words: modalities, physiological indicators, firefighters, physical fatigue, machine learning

中图分类号: