Model for evaluating behavior risk in construction stage of complex construction project

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.08.028

Abstract

Abstract: In order to evaluate the subject behavior risk in construction phase of the complex construction project better, subject behavior risk factors were identified comprehensively for the construction phase, then an evaluation indicator system was established.These were based on the character of behavior risk and get from three dimensions-behavior subject, organizational behavior and project management goal.Weights of the factors were obtained by using the IFAHP method. Pieces of information on both the qualitative evaluation and the quantitative evaluation of the factors were assembled for the group decision making by using IFWA operators. Then a subject behavior risk evaluation model of IFAHP was built. Finally. The validity of the model was verified by running an example. The result shows that the model fully considers the uncertainty of behavior risk and the fuzziness of expert evaluation, and that the evaluation of the subject behavior risk by the model conforms with the actual situation.

Key words: complex construction project, intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IFAHP), subject behavior risk, intuitionistic fuzzy weighted average (IFWA) operator, risk evaluation

CLC Number:

X948

WEN Guofeng, FANG Ying, ZHANG Fanfan. Model for evaluating behavior risk in construction stage of complex construction project[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(8): 162-168.

References

[1] 张统,孙道亮,蒋云,等.2003—2012年我国建筑业事故统计分析研究[J].建筑安全,2013(8):18-21.
[2] 中国智能建筑协会.2016年建筑行业较大级以上施工事故统计分析及常见事故的预防措施[EB/OL].[2017-02-16].http://www.chzl.org/c8/2869.html.
[3] YESHAMBEL Melese,SARA Lumbreras,ANDRES Ramos,et al. Cooperation under uncertainty: assessing the value ofrisk sharing and determining the optimal risk-sharing rule for agents with pre-existing business and diverging risk attitudes[J].International Journal of Project Management,2016,35:530-550.
[4] MARTIN Loosemore. Management public perceptions of risk on construction and engineering projects: how to involve stakeholders in business decisions[J]. The International Journal of Construction Management,2009,9(2):65-74.
[5] 晋良海,肖金克,张荣坤,等.高处作业个体安全防护的修正行为意向模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(7):12-17.
JIN Lianghai, XIAO Jinke,ZHANG Rongkun,et al. Study on modified TPB model for individual safe guarding behavioral intention during high-altitude operation[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2016,26(7):12-17.
[6] 高武,洪开荣.基于行为博弈的特大型工程项目复杂风险组合性均衡评价[J].江南大学学报:人文社会科学版,2014,13(5):73-77.
GAO Wu,HONG Kairong. Dynamic and blurry evaluation of complex risk about super-huge type project based on behavioral game theory[J]. Journal of Jiangnan University: Humanities & Social Sciences,2014,13(5):73-77.
[7] 向鹏成,孔得平.工程项目主体行为风险分析与综合评价[J].统计与决策,2010(6):183-185.
[8] 李娟芳,刘幸.基于灰色聚类的工程项目主体行为风险评价[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(2):146-149.
LI Juanfang,LIU Xing. Subjects behavior risk evaluation of the construction project based on grey clustering method[J]. Science and Technology Management Research,2012,32(2):146-149.
[9] 徐祖润,潘一平,常军,等.基于灰色模糊理论的禄口国际机场二期工程项目行为主体风险评价研究[C].第25届全国灰色系统会议论文集, 2014:298-304.
[10] PATEL D A,JHA K N. Neural network model for the prediction of safe work behavior in construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2015,141(1):25-38.
[11] XU Zeshui,LIAO Huchang. Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. IEEE Translations on Fuzzy Systems,2014, 22(4):749-761.
[12] SZMIDT E,KACPRZYK J. Amount of information and its reliability in the ranking of Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives[M]. Berlin:Springer Verlag,2009:7-19.
[13] DE S K,BISWAS R,ROY A R. Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Set & System,2000,114(3):477-484.
[14] 戚筱雯.不确定环境中的混合型多属性群决策方法及应用研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2015.
QI Xiaowen. Hybird multiple attribute group decision making method in the uncertain environment and the application research[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology,2015.
[15] 马齐飞扬,赵庶旭.改进TOPSIS在铁路应急救援决策中的应用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2016, 26(1):155-161.
MA Qifeiyang, ZHAO Shuxu. Application of improved TOPSIS method in decision-making of railway emergency rescue[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(1):155-161.