Study on method for identifying hazardous factors in CRES:  EETD taken as an example

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.01.018

Abstract

Abstract: The limitations of traditional hazard identification methods were clarified, and the STPA method of STMAP was applied to analyze the hazard event in which the CRES couldn't break the EMU, the safety problem was regarded as a control problem, the on-board earthquake emergency treatment device was taken as an example to analyze its unsafe control actions, the causes of the unsafe control actions, and it's hazardous factors were analyzed. A comparison was made between the traditional FTA method and the STPA method based on the STAMP model. The effectiveness of the STPA method in identifying hazardous factors was assessed. The results show that the effectiveness of the STPA method is greater than that of the FTAmethod, and that using the former can identify more than what using the latter can, and the difference includes but is not limited to design faults and poor communication.

Key words: hina high-speed railway earthquake early-warning system(CRES), on-board earthquake emergency treatment device(EETD), hazard factor identification, system-theoretic accident model and process(STAMP), system-theoretic process analysis(STPA)

CLC Number:

X913.4
U298

LI Jingsheng, ZHAO Lin, WANG Yang, MENG Liang. Study on method for identifying hazardous factors in CRES: EETD taken as an example[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(1): 106-111.

References

[1] TJ/GW 147—2016, 高速铁路地震预警监测系统暂行技术条件[S].
TJ/GW 147-2016, Technical condition for high-speed railway earthquake early-warning and monitoring system[S].
[2] 李京生,张湜,赵林.基于网闸技术的高速铁路地震预警监测系统安全性研究[J].铁道运输与经济,2018,40(7): 101-104.
LI Jingsheng, ZHANG Shi, ZHAO Lin. Research on security of high-speed railway earthquake early-warning and monitoring system based on gap technology[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2018,40(7): 101-104.
[3] 刘敬辉,戴贤春,郭湛,等. 铁路系统基于风险的定量安全评估方法[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2009,30(5): 123-128.
LIU Jinghui, DAI Xianchun, GUO Zhan, et al. Quantitative safety assessment method based on risk in railway system[J]. China Railway Science, 2009,30(5): 123-128.
[4] 沈伟. 铁路控制系统的FMEA方法[J]. 铁道通信信号, 2015,51(5): 46-48.
[5] 刘金涛. 基于STPA的需求阶段的高速列车运行控制系统安全分析方法研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2015.
LIU Jintao. A safety analysis method for high-speed railway train control system in requirements phase based on STPA[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015.
[6] 韩笑. 基于UML和STPA的RBC交接场景安全分析研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2016.
HAN Xiao. Safety analysis of RBC handover based on UML and STPA[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016.
[7] Q/CR 637—2018, 中国高速铁路地震预警系统型号编制方法(报批稿)[S].
Q/CR 637-2018, Model designation method for china high-speed railway earthquake early-warning system[S].
[8] TJ/GW 149—2016, 车载地震紧急处置装置暂行技术条件[S].
TJ/GW 149-2016, Interim specifications for on-board earthquake emergency treatment device[S].
[9] LEVESON Nancy G. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012.
[10] LEVESON Nancy G. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4): 237-270.
[11] LEVESON Nancy G. A new approach to hazard analysis for complex systems[C]. Proceedings of International Conference of the System Safety Society, 2003: 498-507.
[12] 刘金涛,唐涛,赵林,等. 基于STPA的CTCS-3级列控系统功能安全分析方法[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2014,35(5): 86-95.
LIU Jintao, TANG Tao, ZHAO Lin, et al. Functional safety analysis method of CTCS-3 level system based on STPA[J]. China Railway Science, 2014,35(5): 86-95.
[13] 甘旭升,崔浩林,刘卫东,等. STPA危险分析方法及其在ATSA-ITP设计中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(5): 80-86.
GAN Xusheng, CUI Haolin, LIU Weidong, et al. STPA hazard analysis method and its application in ATSA-ITP design[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(5): 80-86.
[14] GB/T 13861—2009, 生产过程危险和有害因素分类与代码[S].
GB/T 13861-2009, Classification and code for the hazardous and harmful factors in process[S].

[1]	WANG Tiedan, MU Yiqiang, PENG Dinghong. Hesitant fuzzy method with variable weight for HAZOP risk sorting [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 61-67.
[2]	PENG Yaxiong, LIU Guangjin, HUANG Zhigang, LYU Hubo, WU Li. Study on catastrophe instability criterion of surrounding rock in tunnels blasting crossing water-rich fault zones [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 104-111.
[3]	LIU Jiahao, YU Yang, ZHANG Zhenxing, YU Jianxing, WANG Weiwei, FU Yiqin. Risk assessment method of risers based on two-dimensional cloud model and BN [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 147-154.
[4]	LYU Zhen, QI Chunhua, ZHU Shoulin. Dynamic visual characteristics and load of drivers during overtaking maneuvers on prairie highways [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(4): 15-22.
[5]	HU Xiaobing, LI Jiaru, LIU Chengyue, LI Hang, ZHOU Hang. An improved betweenness for importance assessment of network nodes and links [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(3): 33-40.
[6]	LUO Fuzhou, YUAN Huiqing, ZHANG Yang. Assessment on fire safety resilience of old industrial building regeneration projects [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(3): 167-173.
[7]	LUO Zhengshan, DUAN Yuanzhe, WANG Xiaowan, ZHANG Xinsheng. Evaluation on sealing performance of mudstone caprocks of gas reservoir-type gas storage in high temperature environment [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 74-82.
[8]	ZHANG Ge. Pneumoconiosis risk assessment method based on cumulative dust exposure [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(2): 200-206.
[9]	SHI Juan, CHANG Dingyi, ZHENG Peng. An early warning model of unsafe behaviors of construction workers based on BP neural network [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 27-33.
[10]	LIU Zhuofan, ZHOU Xingchi, LIU Tong, WU Fuwei. Impact of visual distraction degree on car following state [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 58-64.
[11]	SONG Yinghua, BAI Mingxuan, MA Yaping, LYU Wei, HUO Feizhou. Optimal model for fair dispatch of emergency materials considering regional disaster classification [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 172-179.
[12]	YANG Tianzi, WANG Tieli, PENG Hengming, DUAN Hailin. Evaluation on emergency response vulnerability for work safety accidents in small and micro enterprises [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(12): 176-183.
[13]	YU Jianxing, FAN Haizhao, CHEN Haicheng, WU Shibo, HAN Fang, LIU Shaoqing. Risk factors analysis method of marine riser failure and its application [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(11): 47-53.
[14]	SONG Yinghua, WANG Yaxin, MA Yaping, LYU Wei. Research on multi-mode cooperative emergency evacuation scheduling considering types of disaster victims [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(11): 135-140.
[15]	YAN Hongqiao, CHEN Yiyue, TIAN Kun, HU Jinqiu, MAO Yaming, ZHOU Jingtong. Research on key index system and risk evaluation model of enterprise work safety [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(9): 21-28.

Study on method for identifying hazardous factors in CRES: EETD taken as an example

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments