Research on technical system of UAV and manual cooperative inspection

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.S1.4007

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to further study the technical system of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and manual cooperative inspection and improve the application value of the system, the influencing factors and indicator systems of manual inspection and UAV inspection were systematically analyzed. Feature analysis and effect evaluation of UAV and manual cooperative inspection technology were conducted. The results show that manual inspection is influenced by five major factors including terrain conditions, weather conditions, road conditions, fire conditions, and inspection objects, while UAV inspection is influenced by terrain conditions, weather conditions, road conditions, and fire conditions. An evaluation system consisting of 18 four-level indicators for manual inspection, as well as that consisting of 25 four-level indicators for UAV inspection were constructed. UAV and manual cooperative inspections have received the highest scores in terms of quality, efficiency, and safety, and it is significantly superior to a single inspection method, which can further improve the efficiency and precision of fire extinguishing work.

Key words: manual inspection, UAV inspection, cooperative inspection, indicator system, forest and grassland fire

CHENG Haitao, LIU Junnan, WU Zhuoqi, LI Cong, ZHANG Weihao. Research on technical system of UAV and manual cooperative inspection[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(S1): 169-173.

Figures/Tables 5

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

References 10

[1]	彭向阳, 钱金菊, 吴功平, 等. 架空输电线路机器人全自主巡检系统及示范应用[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43(8): 2 582-2 591.
	PENG Xiangyang, QIAN Jinju, WU Gongping, et al. Full automatic inspection system and its demonstration application based on robot for overhead transmission lines[J]. High Voltage Technology, 2017, 43(8): 2 582-2 591.
[2]	吴功平, 曹珩, 皮渊, 等. 高压多分裂输电线路自主巡检机器人及其应用[J]. 武汉大学学报: 工学版, 2012, 45(1): 96-102.
	WU Gongping, CAO Heng, PI Yuan, et al. An autonomous inspection robot for high voltage bundled transmission line and its application[J]. Journal of Wuhan University: Engineering Edition, 2012, 45(1): 96-102.
[3]	徐云鹏, 李庭坚, 毛强. 架空输电线路直升机、无人机及地面人工巡视互补机制探讨与研究[C]. 第四届全国架空输电线路技术交流研讨会论文集, 2013: 754-761.
[4]	杨杰, 席建祥, 王成, 等. 多无人机协同巡视任务规划方法综述[J]. 飞行力学, 2018, 36(5): 1-6.
	YANG Jie, XI Jianxiang, WANG Cheng, et al. Summary of multi-UAV cooperative patrol task planning methods[J]. Flight Mechanics, 2018, 36(5): 1-6.
[5]	于德明, 沈建, 汪骏, 等. 直升机与人工巡视效果对比分析[J]. 中国电力, 2008, 41(11): 25-28.
	YU Deming, SHEN Jian, WANG Jun, et al. Contrastive analysis of helicopter and manual patrol effect[J]. Electric Power, 2008, 41(11): 25-28.
[6]	陈智雄, 杨家伟, 肖楠, 等. 基于无线携能传输和多级边缘卸载的空地协作巡检算法[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(10): 3 961-3 969.
	CHEN Zhixiong, YANG Jiawei, XIAO Nan, et al. Air-ground cooperative inspection algorithm based on wireless power transfer and multi-level edge offloading[J]. Power Grid Technology, 2022, 46(10): 3 961-3 969.
[7]	成亮, 杨沛, 贾燕翀, 等. 配网线路无人机自主巡检的路径规划方法[J]. 无线电工程, 2022, 52(7): 1 213-1 221.
	CHENG Liang, YANG Pei, JIA Yanyan, et al. Path planning method for autonomous UAV inspection of distribution network[J]. Radio Engineering, 2022, 52(7): 1 213-1 221.
[8]	HUANG Zheng, WANG Hongxing, ZHANG Tianpei, et al. The collaborative power inspection task allocation method of ″unmanned aerial vehicle and operating vehicle″[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 62 926-62 934. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074710
[9]	MOLINA M, FRAU P, MARAVALL D. A collaborative approach for surface inspection using aerial robots and computer vision[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(3): DOI: 10.3390/s18030893.
[10]	汤明文, 戴礼豪, 林朝辉, 等. 无人机在电力线路巡视中的应用[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(3): 35-38.
	TANG Mingwen, DAI Lihao, LIN Chaohui, et al. Application of unmanned aerial vehicle in inspecting transmission lines[J]. Electric Power, 2013, 46(3): 35-38.

一级影响因素	二级影响因素
地形状况	高山大岭、山地、丘陵、河网泥沼、平地等
天气状况	干燥、高温天气、雷雨、暴风等雪天
道路状况	路况良好、路况中等、路况较差
火灾状况	火灾初起、旺盛期、衰减熄灭
检查对象	森林火灾、草原火灾

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标	四级指标
巡检效益	质量Q	火情勘测率Q1	火灾勘测盲点率
		火情勘测率Q1	火灾勘测辨识率
		火灾救援Q2	指挥、通信
		火灾救援Q2	消防灭火
		隐患识别率Q3	隐患检查辨识率
		隐患识别率Q3	隐患消除率
	安全性S	人身安全性S1	道路运输中安全性
	安全性S	人身安全性S1	巡视过程中安全性
	效率性F	汽车运输效率F1	汽车运输距离
		汽车运输效率F1	汽车运输速度
		巡视效率F2	人工巡视距离
		巡视效率F2	人工巡视速度
	经济性C	直接费C1	车运费用
		直接费C1	人巡费用
		间接费C2	培训费
			管理费
			工伤医疗费
			差旅费

一级影响因素	二级影响因素
天气状况	日常、雨天、雪天、大风、大雾等
检查对象	森林火灾、草原火灾等
地形状况	高山大岭、山地、丘陵、河网泥沼、平地等
道路状况	路况良好、路况中等、路况较差

一级指标	二级指标	三级指标	四级指标
巡检效益	质量Q	火情勘测率Q1	火灾勘测盲点率
		火情勘测率Q1	火灾勘测辨识率
		火灾救援Q2	指挥和通信
		火灾救援Q2	辅助灭火
		隐患识别率Q3	隐患检查辨识率
		隐患识别率Q3	隐患消除率
	安全性S	人身安全性S1	道路运输中安全性
		人身安全性S1	巡视过程中安全性
		设备安全性S2	道路运输中无人机安全性
			巡视过程中无人机安全性
			巡视过程调控设备安全性
	效率性F	汽车运输效率F1	汽车运输距离
		汽车运输效率F1	汽车运输速度
		飞行运输效率F2	航线规划效率
		飞行巡视效率F3	无人机巡视距离
		飞行巡视效率F3	无人机巡视速度
	经济性C	直接费C1	车运费用
			人工操作费用
			无人机巡视费用
		间接费C2	设备摊销费
			设备维修费
			工伤医疗费
			差旅费
			培训费
			管理费

评估指标	评估结论
评估指标	人工巡视	无人机巡视	无人机与人工协同巡视
质量	较低	较高	高
效率	较低	较高	高
安全性	较低	较高	高
经济性	较高	较低	中等