China Safety Science Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 40-48.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.02.1081

• Safety engineering technology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the impact of abnormal gases in filling work faces on sensor cross-interference

LU Wei1,2(), LUO Rui1, ZHANG Qingsong1,2, ZHUO Hui1,2,**(), LI Jinliang1,2, ZHU Sichao3   

  1. 1 School of Safety and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
    2 Anhui Province University Engineering Technology Research Center for Safe and Efficient Mining,Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
    3 Daizhuang Coal Mining Company, Zaozhuang Mining (Group) Co., Ltd., Zaozhuang Shandong 277000, China
  • Received:2024-09-11 Revised:2024-11-20 Online:2025-02-28 Published:2025-08-28
  • Contact: ZHUO Hui

Abstract:

In order to elucidate the specific causes of abnormal alarms from CH4 and CO sensors in the return corner of the backfill working face, a systematic investigation was conducted. Initially, a programmed heating-gas chromatography (GC) experiment was carried out on filling materials, complemented by on-site GC measurements, to evaluate whether the alarms were attributable to CH4 and CO concentrations exceeding threshold limits. Subsequently, a portable gas detector was employed to monitor various filling materials, identifying the primary materials responsible for triggering the sensor alarms. Finally, GC-mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was performed to characterize the volatile components of adhesives and their interference effects on CH4 and CO sensors. The results indicate that the alarms triggered by CH4 and CO sensors were caused by the volatile gases from adhesives, rather than by an excessive concentration of CH4 or CO. The primary constituents of the adhesive VOCs were alkanes, while secondary components included alcohols and esters. Key interfering substances for CH4 sensor were alkanes such as C5H12, C6H12, and C6H14, with minor contributions from alcohols and esters such as CH4O, C2H4O2, and C3H8O2. All ten tested combustible gases exhibited cross-interference effects on CH4 sensor. Interfering substances for CO sensor included CH4O, C2H4O2, and C3H8O2. While the sensors demonstrated short-term resilience to interference under abnormal gas atmospheres, their stability and anti-interference performance significantly deteriorated with prolonged exposure.

Key words: backfill working face, abnormal gases, sensors, cross-interference, return corner, abnormal alarms, adhesives

CLC Number: