Research on index system of ecological risk assessment for railway planning and design

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.S1.030

Abstract

Abstract: In order to prevent the risk of ecological environment arising from the implementation of railway planning and maintain the safety of the ecosystem, the important environmental sensitive areas in the influence of railway planning and design were selected, such as related planning, soil erosion and other environmental resource loss. The methods of comparative analysis and comprehensive index were used to predict and evaluate the potential of ecological risk, and to estimate the preliminary judgment of the scale of the railway network and layout scheme of ecological environment rationality. The results show that, after the implementation of railway planning, the potential ecological risk is slightly higher. The greatest contribution to potential risk is the ecological risk caused by soil erosion. And the risk of ecological diversity and landscape ecological risk are increased along the line, because the railway construction cuts various ecological landscapes.

Key words: railway planning and design, ecological environment, risk assessment, loss of soil, railway network

CLC Number:

X951

LIANG Zheng. Research on index system of ecological risk assessment for railway planning and design[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(S1): 161-165.

References

[1] 屈广义, 任南琪, 王要武. 铁路网规划环境影响评价方法框架研究[C].中国环境科学学会学术年会文集, 2014:3 252-3 259.
[2] 张偲.高速铁路生态风险评价研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2014.
ZHANG Si. High speed railway ecological risk assessment[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiao Tong University, 2014.
[3] 王德智,邱彭华,方源敏.丽香铁路建设对沿线景观格局影响的尺度效应及其生态风险[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(8):2 493-2 503.
WANG Dezhi, QIU Penghua, FANG Yuanmin. The scale effect of the construction of Lixiang railway on the impact of landscape pattern along the line and its ecological risk[J]. Applied Ecology journal, 2015,26(8): 2 493-2 503.
[4] 屈广义.铁路网规划环境影响评价方法研究及案例应用[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2011.
QU Guangyi. Research on environmental impact assessment method of railway network planning and case application[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2011.
[5] 吕冬梅.铁路规划环境影响识别及评价因子探索[J].铁道劳动安全卫生与环保,2005(5):226-230.
LYU Dongmei. Exploration of environmental impact identification and evaluation factors of railway planning[J].Railway Labor Safety, Sanitation and Environmental protection,2005(5): 226-230.
[6] 史小静.环保部印发城际铁路网规划环评技术要点[N].中国环境报,2017-05-29(002).
[7] 刘小琴,朱坦.城市化进程中环境风险评价的一些问题探讨[J].中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(3):92-95.
LIU Xiaoqin,ZHU Tan. Discussion on some problems of environmental risk assessment in the process of urbanization[J].China Safety Science Journal,2004,14(3): 92-95.
[8] 周婷,蒙吉军.区域生态风险评价方法研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(4):762-767.
ZHOU Ting,MENG Jijun. Study on regional ecological risk assessment method in[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009,28(4): 762-767.
[9] 赵展慧.把最应该保护的地方保护起来[N].人民日报,2017-09-27(003).
[10] 奚江月.基于指数分析的吉林至草市高速公路建设生态风险评估及防治对策研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2012.
XI Jiangyue. Ecological risk assessment and prevention countermeasures of Jilin to Cao expressway construction based on index analysis[D]. Changchun:Northeast Normal University, 2012.

[1]	Guan Wenling, Wang Yutong, Wang Li, Ren Changxing, Dong Chengjie. Risk assessment for physical hazard-bearing bodies based on consequences of hazardous chemical accidents and vulnerability [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 105-112.
[2]	Ren Jie, Qu Shiru, Wang Lili, Han Yuansong, Sun Zhiyuan. Risk assessment model for true north transition in aviation based on STPA-BN [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(5): 165-173.
[3]	Tang Huabin, Xu Lei, Chen Siyu, Ma Songhua. Risk assessment for overdue in-service pressure pipelines based on BOA-SAM-FTA [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(4): 57-64.
[4]	ZHAO Bo. Risk assessment model for embankment slope failure in mining goafs [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(2): 121-126.
[5]	LIU Kunqi, YANG Juan, LI Ziyi, LI Peng, WU Jiansong, LIU Chang. Risk assessment of new urban power systems under extreme weather conditions based on BN-MC [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2026, 36(1): 157-166.
[6]	YANG Dashen, XIA Ji, WEI Rongfang, LIANG Dong, HU Yiming, WANG Renchao. Technical system for geological hazard prevention in mountainous areas pipelines and case studies [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 14-20.
[7]	DU Yan, LYU Mengjia, WANG Qikai, XIE Mowen, JIANG Yujing, LIU Jingnan. Research on risk assessment model of creep landslide instability based on RLE and SF [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S2): 43-49.
[8]	LIAO Guangdong, YU Shilei. Comprehensive prevention and control system for work safety in metallurgical enterprises based on risk quantitative evaluation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S1): 21-28.
[9]	WANG Yizhao, BAI Wenfeng, HE Qinglun, WANG Fei, CHEN Long, HE Sen. A methodology for road collapse risk assessment based on data augmentation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(S1): 234-238.
[10]	QIN Tingrong, ZHANG Xiaojing, LUO Pingping, WU Zhixuan, GUI Yuxiang, XI Yongtao. Risk assessment of ship berthing operations in heavy fog based on cloud model [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 159-166.
[11]	LI Rong, LIU Qing, WANG Lei, ZHONG Yue, LAN Yufeng, NAN Hang. Social risk assessment of Three Gorges lock scheduling mode based on SNA-BN [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(8): 148-155.
[12]	NIE Ruxin, WANG Luo, ZHANG Ziyu. Risk assessment of public opinion on extreme rainstorm disasters based on three-way decisions under event system theory [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(8): 227-235.
[13]	ZHANG Honghai, TANG Sijia, WAN Junqiang. Research on collision risk of parallel air routes under autonomous aircraft operation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(8): 70-83.
[14]	CHEN Zi, QIU Huawan, LIU Jiayu, YANG Siyu, LI Zhiyong. Risk assessment of deep foundation pits in subway stations based on variable fuzzy sets [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(6): 105-110.
[15]	CUI Jinghui, DONG Guoyu, ZHANG Zengqiang, SUN Ninghao, TONG Ruipeng. Analysis and evaluation model of oil and gas pipeline contractor behavior safety risk [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(6): 19-26.