Research on risks of contactless delivery of food cold chain from perspective of new quality productive forces

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.S1.0026

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to promote the improvement of the new mode of contactless delivery, improve the quality of cold chain food, and develop new quality productive forces, it is necessary to study the internal influence mechanism of risk factors of contactless delivery of food cold chain. Firstly, the characteristics of the contactless delivery mode were systematically analyzed based on the national standard documents and related literature, and the risk index system of the contactless delivery of food cold chain was constructed, including six first-level indicators and 17 second-level indicators. Then, the FDANP was used to evaluate the risks at all levels, determine the causal relationship between the factors, and quantify the weight of the risk factors. The results show that information risk, personnel risk, cold chain technology, and equipment risk can affect other risk factors in the first-level indicators. Among the second-level indicators, factors such as natural disasters, delivery timeliness, and optimal transportation planning are the key risk factors. In the future, the new mode of contactless delivery of food cold chain can be improved from three aspects: improving the level of informatization, attaching importance to emergency response capabilities, and enhancing supervision.

Key words: new quality productive force, food cold chain, contactless delivery, risk evaluation, fuzzy DEMATEL & analytic network process (FDANP)

CLC Number:

X936

MA Ying, WANG Shiying, JUN Wenlu, LIANG Benbu. Research on risks of contactless delivery of food cold chain from perspective of new quality productive forces[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(S1): 253-259.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Risk index system of contactless delivery of food cold chain

目标层	一级指标	二级指标	指标释义
食品冷链无接触配送风险指标	人员风险C₁	配送者工作能力R₁^[13]	指配送人员配送冷链食品的综合能力,如保证产品质量、与收货者有效沟通、应对突发事件等能力
		配送者流失R₂^[14]	指因配送人员流失、协调不足导致的配送问题
		收货者对接能力R₃^[14]	指收货者是否能与配送者有效沟通,对“无接触”配送模式的理解度和接受度
	冷链设施及技术风险C₂	冷链基础设施配备R₄^[14]	指运输过程及存放点的制冷设施设备的完备齐全程度,如制冷材料、冷藏车辆、冷藏集装箱、冰柜等是否齐全
		冷链设备质量R₅^[13]	指制冷设备是否能够稳定且准确地满足不同产品的温度和存储要求
		冷链技术支持R₆^[14]	指用于保障冷链的智能温控系统,冷链信息(温度、湿度、位置、状态)监测和追溯系统等
	运输风险C₃	运输工具设备配备R₇^[15]	指配送过程中运输工具设备的完好性和智能化程度
		运输规划最优性R₈^[16]	指根据当时路况,路线规划和车辆调度优化的智能化和合理性
		网点设置合理性R₉^[16]	指配送终端网点布局的合理性
	交付风险C₄	交货时效性R₁₀^[14]	指保证产品的交付时间满足消费者需求
		交货准确性R₁^[15]	指产品自身、产品放置地点符合消费者需求,避免产品取错和丢失
		追责便利性R₁₂^[14]	指当产品交付不符合消费者期望时,消费者追责的便利性
	信息风险C₅	信息传递效率R₁₃^[15-16]	指物流各环节中生成的信息数据的传递速度和准确性
		区域信息化程度R₁₄^[15]	指配送当地的网络基础设施等信息化资源的普及程度,技术的应用前沿性和广泛性
		信息安全性R₁₅^[14]	指信息传输和存储过程中由于缺少安全防护导致消费者的隐私信息的泄露
	突发状态风险C₆	自然灾害R₁₆^[16]	在恶劣或极端天气等环境下,保持物流顺畅运行的能力
	突发状态风险C₆	公共卫生事件R₁₇^[16]	指突发公共卫生事件发生后,保持物流顺畅运行的能力

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 3

References 20

[1]	任保平, 豆渊博. 新质生产力:文献综述与研究展望[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2024, 40(3): 5-16.
	REN Baoping, DOU Yuanbo. New-quality productivity: Literature review and research outlook[J]. Review of Economy and Management. 2024, 40(3): 5-16.
[2]	霍景东, 王敏, 来有为. 无接触服务的发展模式与推广建议[J]. 发展研究, 2020(3): 9-14.
	HUO Jingdong, WANG Min, LAI Youwei. Development model of contactless service and promotion proposal[J]. Development Research, 2020(3): 9-14.
[3]	张林, 蒲清平. 新质生产力的内涵特征、理论创新与价值意蕴[J]. 重庆大学学报:社会科学版, 2023, 29(6): 137-148.
	ZHANG Lin, PU Qingping. The connotation characteristic, theoretical innovation and value implication of new quality productivity[J]. Journal of Chongqing University:Social Science Edition, 2023, 29(6): 137-148.
[4]	王琴梅, 杨军鸽. 数字新质生产力与我国农业的高质量发展研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2023, 52(6): 61-72.
	WANG Qinmei, YANG Junge. Research on digital new quality productivity and the high quality development of Chinese agriculture[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 52(6): 61-72.
[5]	姚树洁, 王洁菲. 数字经济推动新质生产力发展的理论逻辑及实现路径[J]. 烟台大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2024, 37(2): 1-12.
	YAO Shujie, WANG Jiefei. The theoretical logic and implementation path of digital economy promoting the development of new quality productivity forces[J]. Journal of Yantai University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition, 2024, 37(2):1-12.
[6]	郭笛, 潘常虹, 李浩渊, 等. 基于ISM的智能冷藏柜生鲜冷链物流风险因素分析[J]. 中国商论, 2018,(32): 16-17.
	GUO Di, PAN Changhong, LI Haoyuan, et al. Analysis of risk factors of fresh food cold chain logistics in smart refrigerated cabinets based on ISM[J]. China Journal of Commerce, 2018,(32): 16-17.
[7]	李荷华, 郭田森. 后疫情时代生鲜冷链物流风险评估[J]. 物流技术, 2023, 42(7): 65-70.
	LI Hehua, GUO Tiansen. Risk assessment of fresh cold chain logistics in post-epidemic era[J]. Logistics Technology, 2023, 42(7): 65-70.
[8]	NILS B, STEFAN F, STEFAN S. Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective[J]. OR Spectrum, 2021, 43(1): 1-58.
[9]	SONG Byungduk, PARK Kyungsu, KIM Jonghoe. Persistent UAV delivery logistics: MILP formulation and efficient heuristic[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 120: 418-428.
[10]	JIANG Yi, LAI Polin, YANG Chingchiao, et al. Exploring the factors that drive consumers to use contactless delivery services in the context of the continued COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2023,72: DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103276.
[11]	CHRISTIAN N O, MAREK H, DAVID R. Critical factors characterizing consumers' intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter?[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2022,65: DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102865.
[12]	GB/T 39451—2020, 商品无接触配送服务规范[S].
	GB/T 39451-2020, Specification for contactless delivery service of commodities[S].
[13]	刘妍, 廖吉林. 基于FAHP的生鲜电商冷链物流绩效评价研究[J]. 物流科技, 2022, 45(6): 148-150.
	LIU Yan, LIAO Jilin. FAHP based evaluation of fresh food e-commerce cold chain logistics performance[J]. Logistics Technology, 2022, 45(6): 148-150.
[14]	DING Jifeng, WENG Juhui, CHOU Chienchang. Assessment of key risk factors in the cold chain logistics operations of container carriers using best worst method[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2023, 153:116-126.
[15]	AKRAM H W, AKHTAR S, AHMAD A, et al. Developing a conceptual framework model for effective perishable food cold-supply-chain management based on structured literature review[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(6):4907-4 919.
[16]	WU Haoyi, HSIAO H I. Food quality and safety risk diagnosis in the food cold chain through failure mode and effect analysis[J]. Food Control, 2020, 120(4):DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107501.
[17]	李广利, 严一知, 刘文琦, 等. 基于DEMATEL-ISM的矿工不安全情绪形成因子研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 30-37. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.005
	LI Guangli, YAN Yizhi, LIU Wenqi, et al. Research on formation factors of miners' unsafe emotions based on DEMATEL-ISM[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(7): 30-37. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2021.07.005
[18]	黄亚江, 李书全, 李益锌, 等. 基于DEMATEL-ISM-ANP的地铁运营安全韧性综合评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 171-177. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.06.2120
	HUANG Yajiang, LI Shuquan, LI Yixin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on subway operation safety resilience based on DEMATEL-ISM-ANP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(6): 171-177. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.06.2120
[19]	ZHANG Zhichao, JIANG Hongbo, SHAO Ting, et al. Understanding the selection of intelligent engineering B2B platform in China through the fuzzy DANP and TOPSIS techniques: a multi-study analysis[J]. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2023,141:141-160.
[20]	CHEN Chentung. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment[J]. Fuzzy Sets&Systems, 2000, 114(1): 1-9.

一级指标	影响度	被影响度	中心度	原因度	二级指标	影响度	被影响度	中心度	原因度
C₁	3.888 9 (2)	3.205 3 (4)	7.094 2 (3)	0.683 5 (2)	R₁	1.182 0 (3)	0.719 0 (8)	1.901 1 (7)	0.463 0 (3)
					R₂	0.667 0 (11)	0.728 5 (7)	1.395 5 (11)	-0.061 5 (10)
					R₃	1.015 8 (6)	1.023 7 (4)	2.039 5 (5)	-0.007 9 (8)
C₂	2.785 6 (5)	2.739 0 (5)	5.524 6 (6)	0.046 6 (3)	R₄	0.604 5 (12)	0.557 8 (14)	1.162 3 (15)	0.046 7 (7)
					R₅	0.600 9 (13)	0.652 8 (10)	1.253 7 (13)	-0.051 9 (9)
					R₆	0.740 2 (10)	0.532 1 (15)	1.272 4 (12)	0.208 1 (6)
C₃	3.441 0 (4)	3.776 0 (3)	7.217 0 (2)	-0.335 0 (4)	R₇	0.967 4 (7)	0.598 4 (13)	1.565 8 (9)	0.368 9 (4)
					R₈	0.822 3 (8)	1.017 4 (5)	1.839 7 (8)	-0.195 2 (12)
					R₉	0.762 6 (9)	0.399 8 (17)	1.162 4 (14)	0.362 8 (5)
C₄	2.658 6 (6)	4.349 2 (1)	7.007 8 (4)	-1.690 6 (6)	R₁₀	0.484 3 (15)	1.871 9 (1)	2.356 2 (3)	-1.387 5 (17)
					R₁₁	0.554 6 (14)	0.899 9 (6)	1.454 6 (10)	-0.345 3 (14)
					R₁₂	0.414 0 (17)	0.646 9 (11)	1.060 9 (16)	-0.232 9 (13)
C₅	4.303 5 (1)	2.582 1 (6)	6.885 6 (5)	1.721 4 (1)	R₁₃	1.226 6 (2)	0.681 1 (9)	1.907 7 (6)	0.545 5 (2)
					R₁₄	1.774 3 (1)	0.426 3 (16)	2.200 6 (4)	1.348 0 (1)
					R₁₅	0.418 2 (16)	0.608 9 (12)	1.027 1 (17)	-0.190 8 (11)
C₆	3.689 6 (3)	4.115 6 (2)	7.805 2 (1)	-0.425 9 (5)	R₁₆	1.107 4 (4)	1.504 3 (2)	2.611 7 (1)	-0.396 9 (15)
C₆	3.689 6 (3)	4.115 6 (2)	7.805 2 (1)	-0.425 9 (5)	R₁₇	1.031 0 (5)	1.504 3 (2)	2.535 3 (2)	-0.473 3 (16)