New mode of special equipment safety governance: system resilience governance in whole life cycle

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.09.0060

Abstract

Abstract:

To enhance the safety governance level of special equipment, based on the governance paradigm of socio-ecological resilience, and through literature review, pattern construction, structural analysis, and conceptual elaboration, the safety resilience governance mode of the whole life cycle of special equipment was explored. Firstly, the safety governance mode based on the whole life cycle and the safety governance mode based on system resilience were established and analyzed, and the resilience-led special equipment safety governance mode (RL-SES-GM) was constructed. Secondly, direct element system of SES-personnel equipment management (SES-PEM) and indirect element system of SES-mitigating recovery learning coping (SES-MRLC) were established, and the structure of these systems was analyzed. Based on this, the risks from the perspective of system resilience throughout the whole life cycle were defined. Finally, a two-dimensional governance paradigm structure of "safety soft science + hardware equipment", a triple pre-control mechanism structure of "risk grading control + hidden danger investigation and management + safety resilience", and a two-dimensional technology structure driven by "data + knowledge" were constructed. The results show that the established two-dimensional governance paradigm structure, the triple pre-control mechanism structure, and the two-dimensional technical structure in this paper provide a paradigmatic support for the formulation and optimization of risk prevention and control policies. SES-PEM and SES-MRLC of safety & security governance lay the foundation for quantitative research and decision-making efficiency in safety & security governance. The whole life cycle RL-SES-GM effectively drive the paradigm transformation of special equipment safety governance. The governance mode under the coupling mechanism of whole life cycle and system resilience should targetedly improve the "mitigating ability, recovery ability, learning ability, and coping ability" in different periods.

Key words: special equipment, safety governance, whole life cycle, system resilience, element system

CLC Number:

X913安全系统学

REN Chongbao, WANG Chengzhu, LAN Qi, HAO Suli, CUI Jianfeng. New mode of special equipment safety governance: system resilience governance in whole life cycle[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 8-19.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

References 33

[1]	市场监管总局特种设备局. 市场监管总局关于2024年全国特种设备安全状况的通告[EB/OL].(2025-04-23). https://www.samr.gov.cn/tzsbj/qktb/tb/art/2025/art_1b31b22095744942af16cf24cec957ac.html.
[2]	任崇宝, 蓝麒, 郝素利, 等. 基于数据驱动的电梯安全风险要素识别研究[J]. 中国特种设备安全, 2024, 40(增1):1-8.
	REN Chongbao, LAN Qi, HAO Suli, et al. Research on elevator safety risk factor identification based on data-driven[J]. China Special Equipment Safety, 2024, 40(S1): 1-8.
[3]	任崇宝. 基于数据驱动的电梯安全风险要素识别与预警研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2023.
	REN Chongbao. Research on elevator safety risk factor identification and early warning based on data-driven[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, 2023.
[4]	江书军. 基于风险的特种设备使用单位安全分类监管研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2013.
	JIANG Shujun. Research on the special equipment user's safety classification supervision based on risk[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, 2013.
[5]	郝素利. 特种设备安全多中心协同治理模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9):155-160. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.09.025
	HAO Suli. Research on polycentric synergetic governance model of special equipment safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(9): 155-160. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.09.025
[6]	郝素利, 石芬芬. 风险感知、协同治理:媒体参与特种设备安全治理的路径分析[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2023(11):54-61.
	HAO Suli, SHI Fenfen. Risk perception and collaborative governance: the path research of media Participating in Special Equipment safety governance[J]. Research on China Market Regulation, 2023(11): 54-61.
[7]	张诗悦, 丁日佳, 丁文均. 多元共治下的特种设备安全效益分配模式[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(10):149-154. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.10.025
	ZHANG Shiyue, DING Rijia, DING Wenjun. Research on model of safety benefit allocation for special equipment under multiple co-governance[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(10): 149-154. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.10.025
[8]	郝素利. 特种设备安全监管新模式:多中心治理[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(7):9-17.
	HAO Suli. The new mode of special equipment safety regulation: multi-centered governance[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018(7): 9-17.
[9]	陈浩伟. 多中心治理视角下化工园区特种设备安全管理研究:以江苏省大丰港化工园区为例[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2021(9):38-41.
	CHEN Haowei. Research on special equipment safety management of chemical industrial zone from perspective of multi-centric[J]. Research on China Market Regulation, 2021(9): 38-41.
[10]	韩妤华. 基于云服务的特种设备作业人员继续教育系统研究[J]. 机电技术, 2020 (1):41-42, 89.
[11]	蓝麒. 电梯安全脆弱性理论及协同治理体系研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2018.
	LAN Qi. Research on vulnerability theory and collaborative governance system of elevator safety[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, 2018.
[12]	丁日佳, 田铮. 电梯责任保险对电梯公共安全管理的影响:基于双重差分模型的实证[J]. 经济经纬, 2020, 37(5):169-176.
	DING Rijia, TIAN Zheng. Research on the impact of elevator liability insurance on elevator public safety management: an empirical study based on the difference-in-differences model[J]. Economic Survey, 2020, 37(5): 169-176.
[13]	樊博, 聂爽. 应急管理中的“脆弱性”与“抗逆力”:从隐喻到功能实现[J]. 公共管理学报, 2017, 14(4):129-140,159-160.
	FAN Bo, NIE Shuang. Prospects and explanations of international crisis management research in public administration[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2017, 14(4): 129-140, 159-160.
[14]	张怡梦. 中国西部地区生态脆弱性评估:面向西部45个城市的探索性研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2018, 33(8):74-84.
	ZHANG Yimeng. The evaluation of ecological vulnerability in western China: an exploratory analysis based on 45 cities in western China[J]. Journal of Statistics and Information, 2018, 33(8): 74-84.
[15]	梁永礼. 我国金融系统安全评价与风险预警研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018.
	LIANG Yongli. Research on the evaluation and early warning of China's financial security[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2018.
[16]	叶立国. 系统科学理论体系的理性重建:“内外融合的非线性立体结构”[J]. 系统科学学报, 2020, 28(1):6-11.
	YE Liguo. Rational reconstruction of theoretical system of systems science: "nonlinear stereoscopic structure syncretizing the inside and outside"[J]. Journal of Systems Science, 2020, 28(1): 6-11.
[17]	郝全洪. 协同发展的现代产业体系建设的制约因素与应对之策:基于系统科学理论的若干思考[J]. 江淮论坛, 2021(1):37-43, 193.
	HAO Quanhong. The restrictive factors and suggestions on the construction of modern industrial system of coordinated development: analysis based on the theory of systems science[J]. Jiang-huai Tribune, 2021(1): 37-43, 193.
[18]	郝全洪. 系统科学视角的发展现代产业体系的理论逻辑[J]. 西北大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2021, 51(1):101-108.
	HAO Quanhong. Theoretical logic of developing modern industrial system from the perspective of system science[J]. Journal of Northwest University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 51(1): 101-108.
[19]	王秉, 吴超. 安全信息学论纲[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(2):88-96.
	WANG Bing, WU Chao. The outline of safety informatics[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2018, 37(2): 88-96.
[20]	顾基发, 唐锡晋, 朱正祥. 物理-事理-人理系统方法论综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2007, 7(6):51-60.
	GU Jifa, TANG Xijin, ZHU Zhengxiang. Survey on Wuli-Shili-Renli system approach[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2007, 7(6): 51-60.
[21]	周利敏. 从社会脆弱性到社会生态韧性:灾害社会科学研究的范式转型[J]. 思想战线, 2015, 41(6): 50-57.
	ZHOU Limin. From social fragility to socio-ecological toughness:paradigmatic transformation of the research of social-disaster science[J]. Thinking, 2015, 41(6): 50-57.
[22]	高恩新. 防御性、脆弱性与韧性:城市安全管理的三重变奏[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(11): 105-110.
	GAO Enxin. Defensiveness, vulnerability and resilience: three paradigms of urban safety studies[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2016(11): 105-110.
[23]	王秉, 吴超. 科学层面的安全管理信息化的三个关键问题思辨:基本内涵、理论动因及焦点转变[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(8):114-120.
	WANG Bing, WU Chao. Thoughts about the three key questions of safety management informatization on the science level: basic connotation,theoretical motives and focus changes[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2018, 37(8): 114-120.
[24]	陈宝智, 吴敏. 事故致因理论与安全理念[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2008, 4(1):42-46.
	CHEN Baozhi, WU Min. Etiologies of accident and safety concepts[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2008, 4(1): 42-46.
[25]	刘国愈, 雷玲. 海因里希事故致因理论与安全思想因素分析[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2013, 20(1):138-142.
	LIU Guoyu, LEI Ling. Heinrich accident causation theory and safety thought factor analysis[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2013, 20(1): 138-142.
[26]	CPASE M001—2015,电梯应急处置平台技术规范[S].
	CPASE M001-2015, Technical specification for elevator emergency handling platform[S].
[27]	蓝麒, 肖莉. 中国电梯安全责任保险蓝皮书(2021)[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社,2021:15-35.
[28]	刘铁民, 朱慧, 张程林. 略论事故灾难中的系统脆弱性:基于近年来几起重特大事故灾难的分析[J]. 社会治理, 2015(4):65-70.
[29]	市场监管总局. 中华人民共和国特种设备安全法[EB/OL].(2019-08-20). https://www.samr.gov.cn/tzsbj/zcfg/flfg/art/2019/art_39715c5a62f64e32aa522fcc2afd6298.html.
[30]	佟瑞鹏, 王露露, 胡向阳, 等. 安全软科学研究追溯与展望:内涵、外延与挑战[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4):1-8. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1894
	TONG Ruipeng, WANG Lulu, HU Xiangyang, et al. Review and prospect of safety soft science research: connotation, extension and challenge[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4): 1-8. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1894
[31]	罗云, 裴晶晶, 许铭, 等. 我国安全软科学的发展历程、现状与未来趋势[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1):1-11. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.001
	LUO Yun, PEI Jingjing, XU Ming, et al. The development history, current situation and future trend of safety soft science in China[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(1): 1-11. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.01.001
[32]	王海清, 张玉倩, 郑威, 等. 基于主次屏障的化工装置事故根因分析及“双预”机制应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(2):131-137. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.02.1032
	WANG Haiqing, ZHANG Yuqian, ZHENG Wei, et al. Root cause analysis of chemical installation accident based on primary-secondary barriers and its application on double prevention mechanism[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 32(2): 131-137.
[33]	王启飞, 赵逸涵, 刘帅, 等. 煤矿事故大数据驱动的风险治理模式研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(7):28-37. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.07.0154
	WANG Qifei, ZHAO Yihan, LIU Shuai, et al. Review of big data-driven risk governance models for coal mine accidents[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(7): 28-37. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.07.0154