KZ-28型可控震源车防翻架安全性能研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.09.011

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 62-67.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.09.011

KZ-28型可控震源车防翻架安全性能研究

敬爽^1,2 实验师, 陈振¹ 讲师, 敬常润³ 工程师

1 西南石油大学石油天然气装备教育部重点实验室,四川成都 610500
2 西南石油大学工程训练中心,四川成都 610500
3 川庆钻探工程公司井下作业公司,四川成都 610213

收稿日期:2018-07-10 修回日期:2018-08-15 出版日期:2018-09-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
作者简介:敬爽(1987—),女,四川阆中人,硕士,实验师,主要从事石油机械、机械结构的可靠性与稳定性研究。E-mail:270116043@qq.com。

Research on safety performance ofKZ-28 vibroseis rollover protective structure

JING Shuang^1,2, CHEN Zhen¹, JING Changrun³

1 Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Equipment,Ministry of Education, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China
2 Engineering Training Center, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China
3 Downhole Services Company of Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Co., Ltd, Chengdu Sichuan 610213, China

Received:2018-07-10 Revised:2018-08-15 Online:2018-09-28 Published:2020-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为降低油气勘探行业可控震源车侧翻事故对乘员及驾驶室仪器设备的危害,建立防翻架安全性能(安全保护能力和吸能性能)评价指标体系,安全保护能力评价指标包括安全空间侵入率和安全空间加速度,吸能性能评价指标包括驾乘区域各部件能量吸收率和驾乘区域各部件变形程度;仿真模拟有无防翻架条件下震源车侧翻过程,结合仿真结果评价防翻架安全性能。结果表明:相较于无防翻架,KZ-28震源车的防翻架能使驾驶室受压变形减轻10%,乘员受冲击能量降低2.5%,侵入率降低2.6%;但在其保护下,驾驶室侵入率仍达4.2%,有较高挤压风险,这种防翻架不满足安全性能评价指标要求。

关键词: 油气勘探, KZ-28型可控震源车, 防翻架, 安全保护, 性能评价

Abstract: In order to reduce the harm of rollover accident of vibroseis vehicle to the cab crew's life and equipment in oil and gas exploration, rollover processes of a KZ-28 vibroseis truck with and without its rollover protective structure were simulated after establishing an index system for safety protection and performance evaluation (safety protection capability and energy absorption performance). Safety protection capability evaluation indexes include cab's safety space intrusion rate and acceleration. Energy absorption perforrnance evaluation indexes indude energy absorption rate and deformation degree of each component in the cab area. The safety performance of the rollover protective structure was evaluated and verified by the simulation results. The research shows that the rollover protective structure reduces the compression deformation of the cab is by 10%, the impact energy on the driver by 2.5%, and the invasion rate by 2.6%, and that through the cab is protective by the rollover protective structure, the invasion rate is as high as 4.2%, there is still a high risk of extrusion.

Key words: oil and gas exploration, KZ-28 type vibroseis, rollover protective structure, safety protection, performance evaluation

中图分类号:

X935

敬爽, 陈振, 敬常润. KZ-28型可控震源车防翻架安全性能研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 62-67.

JING Shuang, CHEN Zhen, JING Changrun. Research on safety performance ofKZ-28 vibroseis rollover protective structure[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(9): 62-67.

参考文献

[1] 刘洪斌,陈如恒. 地震勘探震源的历史与发展[J]. 石油机械, 1997, 25 (8): 43-52.
LIU Hongbin, CHEN Ruheng. History and development of seismic vibroseis [J]. Petroleum Machinery, 1997, 25 (8): 43-52.
[2] 李琴, 刘航. 可控震源车侧翻保护架结构现状与设计探讨[J].物探装备, 2015, 25 (3): 159-164.
LI Qin, LIU Hang. Discussion on current status of roll over protection frame on vibrator and its improvement design[J]. Equipment of Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 25 (3): 159-164.
[3] JIN Z L, WENG J S, HU H Y. Rollover stability of a vehicle during critical driving manoeuvres[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2007, 221 (9): 1 041-1 049.
[4] GB/T8420—2011,司机的身材尺寸与司机的最小活动空间 [S].
GB/T8420-2011, The size of the driver of the earthmoving machinery and the minimum activity space of the driver[S].
[5] 马春生,黄世霖. 汽车正面碰撞法规中乘员保护指标探讨[J]. 公路交通科技,2004, 21(1): 94-97.
MA Chunsheng, HUANG Shilin. Discussion on occupant protection indicators in vehicle frontal collision regulations [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2004, 21(1): 94-97.
[6] 韩勇. 某校车车身结构碰撞吸能特性及优化分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24 (10): 35-41.
HAN Yong. Analysis of crash properties of a certain school bus body structure and its optimization[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24 (10): 35-41.
[7] 袁庆强. 解析中美汽车安全法规和人体伤害的差异[J]. 北京汽车,2007(5): 8-11.
YUAN Qingqiang. Analysis of differences between Chinese and American car safety regulations and human injuries [J]. Beijing Automotive Engineering,2007(5): 8-11.
[8] FMVSS—216,美国联邦机动车安全标准 [S].
FMVSS-216,The United States federal motor vehicle safety standard [S].
[9] 于向军.工程车辆侧翻安全性动态仿真及试验研究[D].长春: 吉林大学, 2009.
YU Xiangjun. Dynamic simulation and experimental study on safety of rollover of construction vehicles [D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2009, 5: 13-15.
[10] 赵登峰,王国强,许纯新,等. 工程车辆ROPS有限元分析及试验研究[J].工程机械, 2003 (6): 22-25.
ZHAO Dengfeng, WANG Guoqiang, XU Chunxin, et al. ROPS finite element analysis and experimental study of construction vehicles [J]. Construction Machinery, 2003 (6): 22-25.
[11] 郑霞忠,郭雅薇,石法起,等. 塔机作业模糊认知可靠性与失误分析方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26 (6): 98-103.
ZHENG Xiazhong,GUO Yawei,SHI Faqi, et al. Study on fuzzy cognitive reliability and fault analysis method of tower crane [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26 (6): 98-103.
[12] SELIM S, MARTIN C, ROBERT S. A methodology for the design of robust rollover prevention controllers for automotive vehicles: part 1-differential braking[C]. Proceedings of 45^th Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Conference on Decision and Control, 2006: 1 739-1 744.
[13] 王子源,李学飞,马铸,等. 大型装载机翻车保护结构的有限元分析及试验研究[J].矿山机械, 2011, 39 (8): 39-43.
WANG Ziyuan, LI Xuefei, MA Zhu, et al. Finite element analysis and experimental study of rollover protection structure for large loaders [J]. Mining Machinery, 2011, 39 (8): 39-43.

KZ-28型可控震源车防翻架安全性能研究

Research on safety performance ofKZ-28 vibroseis rollover protective structure

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘向东, 杨新华, 张斗. 安全保护区外铁路电力电缆保护措施研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 74-78.
[2]	马晋欣, 崔有泉, 王羽杰, 钟智丰. 铁路线路安全保护区设立^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(S2): 115-118.
[3]	马永驰. 外部威胁下关键基础设施安全保护研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(7): 171-.
[4]	周荣义，李石林，刘何清. HAZOP分析中LOPA的应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(7): 76-.
[5]	刘伟，陈晓红. 安全成本与国际贸易竞争力关系的经济学分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(9): 34-.
[6]	孔繁余，袁寿其，刘厚林，刘建瑞，施卫东，陈刚. 孔板管路对磁力泵工作的安全保护[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(4): 51-.
[7]	田晋跃，于英，郭荣. 工程车辆空中作业机构安全液压阀保护机理研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2003, 13(4): 32-.
[8]	刘岩，隋旭. 起重机械安全保护控制装置的可靠性和有效性探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2002, 12(3): 39-.