储罐壁板缺陷的漏磁场信号研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.05.012

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 67-72.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.05.012

储罐壁板缺陷的漏磁场信号研究

杨志军¹ 副教授, 张振龙¹, 吴忠义², 刘玉琢³, 于永亮³ 工程师

1 东北石油大学机械科学与工程学院,黑龙江大庆 163318;
2 中国石油大庆炼化分公司,黑龙江大庆 163411;
3 南京市锅炉压力容器检验研究院,江苏南京 210002

收稿日期:2019-01-20 修回日期:2019-03-28 发布日期:2020-11-02
作者简介:杨志军(1976—),男,辽宁铁岭人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事现代无损检测技术及漏磁检测技术等方面的研究及教学工作。E-mail:yangzjzj@163.com。张振龙(1993—),男,宁夏石嘴山人,硕士研究生,研究方向为现代无损检测技术及漏磁检测技术。E-mail:zhangzhenlongnx@126.com。
基金资助:
国家青年自然科学基金资助(51607035);国家质检总局科技计划项目(2017QK050);浙江省质监系统科技计划项目(20180352)。

Research on leakage magnetic field signals of tank wall defects

YANG Zhijun¹, ZHANG Zhenlong¹, WU Zhongyi², LIU Yuzhuo³, YU Yongliang³

1 School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing Heilongjiang 163318, China;
2 Daqing Refining and Chemical Company, China National Petroleum Corporation, Daqing Heilongjiang 163411, China;
3 Nanjing Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspection Institute, Nanjing Jiangsu 210002, China

Received:2019-01-20 Revised:2019-03-28 Published:2020-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为实现储罐壁板腐蚀缺陷检测,保障储罐安全运行,开展罐壁腐蚀缺陷漏磁检测技术研究。基于漏磁检测原理,利用ANSYS仿真分析在壁板外侧周向励磁与轴向励磁方式下,不同位置(内壁、外壁)不同形状(圆柱形、圆锥形、半球形)的罐壁腐蚀缺陷漏磁场信号;并在实验室条件下开展缺陷检测试验,对仿真结果进行验证。研究表明:试验与仿真结果相同,周向励磁和轴向励磁2种励磁方式下所产生的缺陷漏场信号无明显差异;缺陷均能被检出;外壁缺陷的漏磁场信号强于内壁缺陷;缺陷直径、深度相同时,体积越大漏磁场信号越强。

关键词: 储罐壁板, 漏磁检测, 腐蚀缺陷, 有限元分析, 漏磁场信号

Abstract: In order to detect the corrosion defects of tank wall and ensure the safe operation of tank, magnetic flux leakage testing technology for corrosion defects of tank wall was studied in this paper. Based on the principle of magnetic flux leakage detection, ANSYS was used to simulate and analyze the magnetic flux leakage signals of tank wall corrosion defects with different shapes (cylindrical, conical, hemispherical) at different positions (inner wall, outer wall) under the circumferential and axial excitation modes outside the wall, and the defect detection research was carried out under laboratory conditions to verify the simulation results. The results show that the experimental results are the same as the simulation analysis, that there are no significant differences in the leakage field signals generated by the two magnetization modes of the circumferential magnetization and the axial magnetization, that all defects can be detected, that the magnetic leakage signal of the outer wall defect is stronger than that of the inner wall defect, and that when the defect diameter and depth are the same, the larger the volume is, the stronger the magnetic leakage signal will be.

Key words: tank wall, magnetic flux leakage testing, corrosion defects, finite element analysis, leakage magnetic field signals

中图分类号:

X944.4

杨志军, 张振龙, 吴忠义, 刘玉琢, 于永亮. 储罐壁板缺陷的漏磁场信号研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(5): 67-72.

YANG Zhijun, ZHANG Zhenlong, WU Zhongyi, LIU Yuzhuo, YU Yongliang. Research on leakage magnetic field signals of tank wall defects[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(5): 67-72.

参考文献

[1] 杨志军, 戴光, 陈志华. 储罐底板漏磁检测腐蚀缺陷轮廓反演方法[J]. 无损检测, 2013,35(10):45-47,52.
YANG Zhijun, DAI Guang, CHEN Zhihua. Defect profile inversion by leakage magnetic field for tank bottom corrosion defect[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2013,35(10):45-47,52.
[2] 赵彦修, 项军杰, 王十, 等. 大型常压储罐在用检验技术与策略[J]. 中国特种设备安全, 2014,30(6):29-33,63.
ZHAO Yanxiu, XIANG Junjie, WANG Shi, et al. The inspection techniques and strategies of the active atmospheric storage tank[J]. China Special Equipment Safety, 2014,30(6):29-33,63.
[3] 张鑫, 许乃迪, 于楠. 储罐防腐工程中防腐涂料的选择与应用[J]. 广东化工, 2012,39(11):165-166,72.
ZHANG Xin, XU Naidi, YU Nan. The selection and application of anti-corrosion coatings in tank corrosion engineering[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2012,39(11):165-166,72.
[4] MOBIN M, MALIK A U, ALFOZAN S. Corrosion failure of bottom plates of an aboveground storage tank[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2007,7(1): 18-22.
[5] GB 50128—2014, 立式圆筒形钢制焊接储罐施工规范[S].
GB 50128-2014, Code for construction of vertical cylindrical steel welded storage tanks[S].
[6] SY/T 6620—2014, 油罐的检验、修理、改建及翻建[S].
SY/T 6620-2014, Tank inspection, repair, alteration and reconstruction[S].
[7] 杨鹏, 黄松岭, 赵伟. 在役大型储罐壁板无损检测技术[J]. 无损检测, 2009,31(5):377-380,401.
YANG Peng, HUANG Songling, ZHAO Wei. Nondestructive testing techniques for the wall of tank in service[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2009,31(5):377-380,401.
[8] 戴光, 安冉, 杨志军, 等. 表面缺陷开放漏磁场空间分布特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017,27(4): 82-86.
DAI Guang, AN Ran, YANG Zhijun, et al. Research on distribution of open leakage magnetic field at ferromagnetic component surface defect[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017,27(4): 82-86.
[9] 吴忠义. 储罐壁板自动漏磁检测技术研究[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2018.
WU Zhongyi. Research on automatic magnetic flux leakage detection technology for the wall of tank[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2018.
[10] 张喜艳. 油管缺陷漏磁检测与信号分析研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2009.
ZHANG Xiyan. Research on the analysis method of the magnetic flux leakage testing signal for pipeline defects[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2009.
[11] AFZAL M, UDPA S. Advanced signal processing of magnetic flux leakage data obtained from seamless gas pipeline[J]. NDT & E International, 2002,35(7): 449-457.
[12] FENG Jian, LU Senxiang, LIU Jinhai, et al. A sensor liftoff modification method of magnetic flux leakage signal for defect profile estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2017,53(7): 1-13.
[13] 郑彪华, 何文, 周松强, 等. 管道缺陷漏磁检测的三维有限元仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013,23(12): 35-41.
ZHENG Biaohua, HE Wen, ZHOU Songqiang, er al. Research on numerical simulation of three-dimensional magnetic flux leakage inspection of pipeline defects[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013,23(12): 35-41.
[14] 杨志军, 陈德姝, 陈亮, 等. 腐蚀缺陷漏磁场检测有限元模拟[J]. 无损检测, 2015,37(11):51-55,77.
YANG Zhijun, CHEN Deshu, CHEN Liang, et al. The finite element simulation of magnetic flux leakage detection (MFL) used for corrosion defects[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2015,37(11):51-55,77.
[15] 兵器工业无损检测人员技术资格鉴定考核委员会. 常用钢材磁特性曲线速查手册[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2003: 36-43.
[16] 崔伟, 黄松岭, 赵伟. 传感器提离值对管道漏磁检测的影响[J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007,47(1): 21-24.
CUI Wei, HUANG Songling, ZHAO Wei. Impact of sensor lift-off on magnetic flux leakage detection in pipelines[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University: Science and Technology, 2007,47(1): 21-24.
[17] 吴德会, 柳振凉, 张忠远, 等. 漏磁检测中提离值影响的三维有限元仿真分析[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2013,21(6):1188-1198.
WU Dehui, LIU Zhenliang, ZHANG Zhongyuan, et al. 3-D FEM simulation of lift-off effects on magnetic flux leakage testing[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2013,21(6): 1 188-1 198.

储罐壁板缺陷的漏磁场信号研究

Research on leakage magnetic field signals of tank wall defects

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	支治, 郭世永. 护栏薄壁长杆贯穿胸部的损伤研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 25-30.
[2]	沈小燕, 张凡, 吕卉焘, 闫艳, 刘浩学. 追尾碰撞下液罐车罐体变形失效仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 37-42.
[3]	赵鹏程, 帅健, 唐雨, 许葵. 轴向应力对腐蚀缺陷管道极限内压的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(3): 70-75.
[4]	殷鹰, 蓝朝逊, 李俊, 毛丹, 史君林. 埋地PE燃气管道地质沉降破坏数值分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 18-23.
[5]	石磊, 帅健, 王晓霖, 许葵. 地基沉降对石油储罐象足屈曲的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 56-61.
[6]	戴光, 安冉, 杨志军, 刘延雷, 于永亮. 表面缺陷开放漏磁场空间分布特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(4): 82-86.
[7]	于洋, 刘德俊, 孙东旭. 基于漏磁内检测与分级理念的管道完整性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 169-174.
[8]	吴方义，陈海初，张厚宝，朱银法，熊根良. 基于虚拟样机技术的缓降救生器安全性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(9): 172-.
[9]	王安琪，胡瑾秋，张来斌，李文强. 地下储气库压缩机变工况下动态故障模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(8): 139-.
[10]	李丽民，张国祥，肖尚，蒋建清. 基于潜在滑移线理论的地基承载力安全分析方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 39-.
[11]	戴光，崔巍，张颖，王学增. 基于灰度-梯度共生矩阵的焊缝缺陷聚类分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(3): 79-.
[12]	郑彪华，何文，周松强，张春雷，高忠. 管道缺陷漏磁检测的三维有限元仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(12): 35-.
[13]	张广利，赵新伟，罗金恒，张良. 基于不同评价准则的含腐蚀缺陷管道概率评价方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(9): 57-.
[14]	龙飞飞，高果柱，张晓勇，王丹丹，邢海燕. 平板及焊缝中裂纹磁记忆检测技术研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(7): 102-.
[15]	李云，杨珊，钟福生. 基于有限元与极限平衡分析的露天矿边坡角优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(2): 145-.