冲击载荷作用下煤岩孔隙演化特征试验研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.10.014

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 91-97.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.10.014

冲击载荷作用下煤岩孔隙演化特征试验研究

李胜^1,2 教授, 王箫鹤¹, 范超军¹, 张浩浩¹, 刘铮¹, 殷坤¹

1 辽宁工程技术大学矿业学院,辽宁阜新 123000;
2 煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室,江苏徐州 221116

收稿日期:2019-07-01 修回日期:2019-09-05 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2020-10-27
作者简介:李胜 (1976—),男,四川资中人,博士,教授,主要从事煤与瓦斯突出防治及矿山压力与岩层控制等方面的研究。E-mail:13914181946@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(51674132);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0801407-2);辽宁省教育厅城市研究院项目(LJCl002)。

Experimental study on evolution characteristics of coal pores under impact loadings

LI Sheng^1,2, WANG Xiaohe¹, FAN Chaojun¹, ZHANG Haohao¹, LIU Zheng¹, YIN Kun¹

1 College of Mining Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin Liaoning 123000, China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China

Received:2019-07-01 Revised:2019-09-05 Online:2019-10-28 Published:2020-10-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究冲击载荷作用下煤岩的孔隙与裂隙演化特征,以贵州马场矿的突出煤岩为研究对象,利用分离式霍普金森压杆(SHPB)试验系统、核磁共振(NMR)试验系统和扫描电镜(SEM)试验系统对不同冲击载荷作用下的煤岩孔隙与裂隙的演化特征进行试验研究,分析煤岩在冲击载荷的作用下的孔隙、裂隙的演化规律与煤岩冲击对煤与瓦斯突出的影响。研究表明:随着冲击气压的增加,煤岩的微小孔峰值信号量与孔径占比先增大后减小,孔隙与裂隙的连通性增强,中大孔峰值孔径占比先减小后增大;马场矿煤样微小孔的孔喉分布占总孔喉的38.85% ～56.14%,中大孔的孔喉分布占总孔喉的43.86%～61.15%;在冲击载荷作用下,煤体中孔隙与裂隙演化是以孔隙扩展、裂隙扩张与延伸和次生裂隙的产生等形式进行的,冲击载荷增强了孔隙与裂隙的连通性,瓦斯的吸附/解吸平衡被打破,瓦斯压力升高,煤体中产生了应力集中和能量积聚,使得煤与瓦斯突出发生的可能大大增加。

关键词: 冲击载荷, 孔隙结构, 突出煤岩, 核磁共振(NMR), 孔喉分布

Abstract: In order to study evolution characteristics of coal pores and fractures under impact loadings, with outburst coal of Machang Mine in Guizhou as a research object, Separate Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test system, NMR and Scanning Electron Microscope(SEM) system were utilized to investigate their evolution features under different impact loadings. Then their evolution law and influence of coal impact on coal and gas outburst were analyzed. The results show that with the increase of impact pressure, micro pores' peak value semaphore and diameter ratio increase first and then decrease and connectivity of pores and fractures is enhanced, but peak value diameter ratio of medium and large pores decreases first and then increases. And pore throat distribution of micro pores in Machang Mine accounts for 38.85%～56.14% of the total while that of medium and large ones makes up for 43.86%-61.15%. Under impact loadings, evolution of pores and fractures in coal is carried out in the form of pores expansion, expansion of fractures and formation of secondary fractures. Moreover, impact loading strengthens connectivity of pores and fractures, breaks gas adsorption and desorption balance, causes an increase of gas pressure, and produces stress set and energy accumulation in coal body, thus increasing possibilities of coal and gas outburst.

Key words: impact loading, pore structure, outburst coal, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), pore throat distribution

中图分类号:

X936

李胜, 王箫鹤, 范超军, 张浩浩, 刘铮, 殷坤. 冲击载荷作用下煤岩孔隙演化特征试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 91-97.

LI Sheng, WANG Xiaohe, FAN Chaojun, ZHANG Haohao, LIU Zheng, YIN Kun. Experimental study on evolution characteristics of coal pores under impact loadings[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(10): 91-97.

参考文献

[1] 罗明坤, 范超军, 李胜,等. 煤与瓦斯突出的地质动力系统失稳判据研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2018, 47(1): 137-144.
LUO Mingkun, FAN Chaojun, LI Sheng, et al. Failure criteria of the geological dynamic system of coal and gas outburst[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018, 47(1): 137-144.
[2] 付华, 丰胜成, 高振彪,等. 基于双耦合算法的煤与瓦斯突出预测模型[J].中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 84-89.
FU Hua, FENG Shengcheng, GAO Zhenbiao, et al. Study on double coupling algorithm based model for coal and gas outburst prediction[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018,28(3): 84-89.
[3] AGUADO M B D, NICIEZA C G. Control and prevention of gas outbursts in coal mines, Riosa-Olloniego coalfield, Spain[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2007, 69(4): 253-266.
[4] 李希建, 林柏泉. 煤与瓦斯突出机理研究现状及分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2010, 38(1): 7-13.
LI Xijian, LIN Baiquan. Status of research and analysis on coal and gas outburst mechanism[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2010, 38(1): 7-13.
[5] 于不凡. 煤和瓦斯突出机理[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1985: 35-37.
[6] 吴俊. 突出煤的显微结构及表面特征研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 1987,12(2):42-48, 99-102.
WU Jun. Study on micro-structure and surface feature of coal prone to outburst[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 1987,12(2):42-48, 99-102.
[7] 尹光志, 蒋长宝, 李晓泉,等. 突出煤和非突出煤全应力-应变瓦斯渗流试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011,32(6): 1 613-1 619.
YIN Guangzhi, JIANG Changbao, LI Xiaoquan, et al. An experimental study of gas permeabilities of outburst and nonoutburst coals under complete stress-strain process[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011,32(6): 1 613-1 619.
[8] 李晓泉, 尹光志. 不同性质煤的微观特性及渗透特性对比试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(3): 500-508.
LI Xiaoquan, YIN Guangzhi. Contrast test of microscopic characteristics and seepage properties of different coals[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(3): 500-508.
[9] 袁曦, 张军伟. 分阶段卸载条件下突出煤变形特征与渗流特性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(6): 1 451-1 457.
YUAN Xi, ZHANG Junwei. Deformation and permeability characteristic of outburst coal under step unloading conditions[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(6): 1 451-1 457.
[10] 赵洪宝, 尹光志. 循环载荷作用下突出煤力学性质演化分析[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2012, 35(3): 103-107.
ZHAO Hongbao, YIN Guangzhi. Analysis on mechanical properties evolution of outburst coal under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2012, 35(3): 103-107.
[11] 刘明举, 何学秋. 突出煤的电磁响应特征研究[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报, 2000, 19(5): 470-473.
LIU Mingju, HE Xueqiu. Characteristics of electromagnetic response of outbursts prone coal[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2000, 19(5): 470-473.
[12] 杜文凤, 彭苏萍, 王珂,等. 瓦斯突出煤和非突出煤AVO响应的比较[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2010, 22(6): 45-48.
DU Wenfeng, PENG Suping, WANG Ke, et al. AVO response comparison between gas outburst coal and non outburst coal[J].Coal Geology of China, 2010, 22(6): 45-48.
[13] 李胜, 罗明坤, 范超军,等. 基于核磁共振和低温氮吸附的煤层酸化增透效果定量表征[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(7): 1 748-1 756.
LI Sheng, LUO Mingkun, FAN Chaojun, et al. Quantitative characterization of the effect of acidification in coals by NMR and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(7): 1 748-1 756.
[14] 姚艳斌, 刘大锰, 蔡益栋,等. 基于NMR和X-CT的煤的孔裂隙精细定量表征[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2010, 40(11): 1 598-1 607.
YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng, CAI Yidong, et al. Advanced characterization of pores and fractures in coals by nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography[J]. Science China:Earth Sciences, 2010, 40(11): 1 598-1 607.
[15] 陈雄. 马场煤矿瓦斯赋存构造逐级控制特征分析[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2016, 43(4): 105-108.
CHEN Xiong. Analysis on step-by-step tectonic control characteristics of gas occurrence in Machang coal mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2016, 43(4): 105-108.
[16] GB/T 23561.7—2009, 煤和岩石物理力学性质测定方法第7部分:单轴抗压强度测定及软化系数计算方法[S].
GB/T 23561.7-2009,Methods for determining the physical and mechanical properties of coal and rock-part 7:methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and counting softening coefficient [S].
[17] 李明. 构造煤结构演化及成因机制[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学, 2013.
LI Ming. Structure evolution and deformation mechanism of tectonically deformed coal[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology, 2013.
[18] YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng, CHE Yao, et al. Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(7): 1 371-1 380.
[19] 李恒乐, 秦勇, 张永民, 等. 重复脉冲强冲击波对肥煤孔隙结构影响的实验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40(4): 915-921.
LI Hengle, QIN Yong, ZHANG Yongmin, et al. Experimental study on the effect of strong repetitive pulse shockwave on the pore structure of fat coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2015, 40(4): 915-921.

冲击载荷作用下煤岩孔隙演化特征试验研究

Experimental study on evolution characteristics of coal pores under impact loadings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	洪林, 王文静, 高大猛, 郭英超, 马鸿海. 低温氮吸附中煤阶对临界填充孔径的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 51-58.
[2]	刘佳佳, 胡建敏, 杨明, 方迎香, 贾改妮. 不同层理高阶煤孔隙特征的核磁共振试验^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(9): 83-89.
[3]	杨明, 柳磊, 张学博, 毛俊睿, 柴沛. 不同阶煤孔隙结构与流体特性的核磁共振试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 81-88.
[4]	程健维, 张西西. 爆炸载荷作用下矿井密闭墙损伤评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 132-137.
[5]	周银波, 王思琪, 赵周, 关品品, 许静心, 吴金刚. 碱性溶液对煤体甲烷吸附特征影响机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 28-32.
[6]	陈刘瑜, 李希建, 沈仲辉, 毕娟, 刘钰, 许石青. 贵州北部突出煤的孔隙结构及分形特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 66-72.
[7]	王春霞, 张学博, 卢方超. 基于核磁共振与应力分析的液氮冷浸致裂煤岩研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 156-163.
[8]	代树红, 王正廷, 徐延. 钢构防突风门结构安全性的静动力学分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(12): 74-79.
[9]	卢平，鲍杰，沈兆武. 岩浆侵蚀区煤层孔隙结构特征及其对瓦斯赋存之影响分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2001, 11(6): 41-.
[10]	孙文杰，张雪丽. 防毒面具用活性炭的结构与特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 1999, 9(2): 71-.