考虑风险感知度和系统效率的应急瓶颈资源调度

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.025

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 158-164.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.12.025

考虑风险感知度和系统效率的应急瓶颈资源调度

张伟¹, 杨琴^**1 教授, 曹策俊², 赵欢¹, 潘世凌³

1 四川师范大学商学院,四川成都 610101;
2 重庆工商大学商务策划学院,重庆 400067;
3 四川工商学院经济管理学院,四川成都 611745

收稿日期:2019-09-19 修回日期:2019-11-18 出版日期:2019-12-28 发布日期:2020-11-24
通讯作者: ** 杨琴(1978—),女,四川宜宾人,博士,教授,主要从事应急管理、优化调度等方面的研究。E-mail:yangqin@sicnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:张伟 (1997—),男,四川内江人,硕士研究生,研究方向为应急管理、优化调度等。E-mail: 1464269907@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71904021);2020年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助;四川省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划项目(SC18B093);2017年四川师范大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目。

Scheduling of emergency bottleneck resource considering risk perception and system efficiency

ZHANG Wei¹, YANG Qin¹, CAO Cejun², ZHAO Huan¹, PAN Shiling³

1 School of Business, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu Sichuan 610101, China;
2 School of Business Planning, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;
3 School of Economics Management, Sichuan Technology and Business University, Chengdu Sichuan 611745, China

Received:2019-09-19 Revised:2019-11-18 Online:2019-12-28 Published:2020-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高应急响应过程的救援效率和质量,在研究应急资源调度问题时,采用考虑不同受灾群众的风险感知度和应急瓶颈资源效率的方法,制定合理的调度方案。首先,细分应急响应过程和受灾群众类型,从资源环境、任务约束和优化目标等3个方面描述应急资源调度问题;然后,基于前景理论(PT)刻画受灾群众行为,构建风险感知度函数,建立0-1非线性多目标整数规划模型;最后,采用遗传算法仿真求解模型,并进行帕累托和敏感性分析。结果表明:在应急资源调度过程中考虑不同受灾群众的风险感知度与应急瓶颈资源的效率,有助于降低受灾群众的风险感知度,提高救援效率和决策质量。

关键词: 优化调度, 系统效率, 整数规划模型, 应急瓶颈资源, 风险感知度

Abstract: To improve rescue efficiency and quality of the emergency response process, risk perception of different types of victims and the efficiency of emergency bottleneck resources need to be considered in research regarding the emergency resource scheduling problem, thereby a reasonable scheduling scheme can be formulated. Firstly, the emergency response stages and types of victims were subdivided, and the emergency resources scheduling problem was described from three aspects: resource environment, task constraints and optimization objectives. Next, the Prospect Theory (PT) was used to characterize the victims' behaviors and construct the risk perception function, and then the 0-1 nonlinear multi-objective integer programming model was established. Furthermore, genetic algorithm was used to simulate the problem, and the computational results were portrayed by Pareto and sensitivity analysis. The results show that in emergency resource scheduling process, considering the risk perception of different types of victims and the efficiency of emergency bottleneck resources can help to reduce victims' risk perception and improve the rescue efficiency and decision-making quality.

Key words: optimal scheduling, system efficiency, integer programming model, emergency bottleneck resources, risk perception

中图分类号:

X913.1

张伟, 杨琴, 曹策俊, 赵欢, 潘世凌. 考虑风险感知度和系统效率的应急瓶颈资源调度[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 158-164.

ZHANG Wei, YANG Qin, CAO Cejun, ZHAO Huan, PAN Shiling. Scheduling of emergency bottleneck resource considering risk perception and system efficiency[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(12): 158-164.

参考文献

[1] ARDAYA B A, EVERS M,RIBBE L. What influences disaster risk perception?intervention measures, flood and landslide risk perception of the population living in flood risk areas in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017,25: 227-237.
[2] 王治莹, 岳朝龙. 舆情传播中考虑公众风险感知的多资源流应急优化调度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(6): 115-123.
WANG Zhiying, YUE Chaolong. Emergency optimal scheduling of multi-resource flow considering the public's risk perception in public opinion propagation[J]. China Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(6): 115-123.
[3] CAO Cejun, LI Congdong, YANG Qin,et al. A novel multi-objective programming model of relief distribution for sustainable disaster supply chain in large-scale natural disasters [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,174: 1 422-1 435.
[4] 任斌, 朱昌锋, 钟校. 基于前景理论的应急物资需求动态调整模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 179-184.
REN Bin, ZHU Changfeng, ZHONG Xiao. A PT based model for dynamic adjusting emergency material demand[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(3): 179-184.
[5] 冯春, 廖海燕, 田小强,等. 多情景模式下应急资源精益配置模型与算法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(6): 185-191.
FENG Chun, LIAO Haiyan, TIAN Xiaoqiang, et al. Model and algorithm for lean principle based deploying emergency resources[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(6): 185-191.
[6] WILSON D T, HAWE G I, COATES G, et al. A multi-objective combinatorial model of casualty processing in major incident response[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 230(1): 643-655.
[7] KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[8] MICHAEL P[美]. 调度:原理、算法和系统(第2版)[M]. 张智海,译.北京:清华大学出版社, 2005: 61-64, 75-101.
MICHAEL P. Scheduling: theory, algorithms, and systems(2^nd Edition)[M]. ZHANG Zhihai,Translated.Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2005: 61-64, 75-101.
[9] WALDHERR S, POPPENBORG J, KNUST S. The bottleneck transportation problem with auxiliary resources[J]. 4OR: Quarterly Journal of the Belgian, French and Italian Operations Research Societies, 2015, 13(3): 279-292.
[10] EDIS E B, OGUZ C, OZKARAHAN I. Parallel machine scheduling with resources: notation, classification, models and solution methods[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 230(3):449-463.
[11] 陈钢铁, 贺政纲, 黎青松. 考虑公众期望的震后应急资源调度优化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(6): 171-176.
CHEN Gangtie, HE Zhenggang, LI Qingsong. Study on emergency resources dispatch optimization considering public expectation after earthquake[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(6): 171-176.
[12] CAO Cejun, LI Congdong, YANG Qin, et al. Multi-Objective optimization model of emergency organization allocation for sustainable disaster supply chain[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(11): 1-22.
[13] CAO Cejun, LI Congdong, LI Wenbo. Research on the relief scheduling model considering victims' satisfaction for emergency response in large-scale disasters[C]. Proceedings of the 22^nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2015, 2016: 679-690.
[14] TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
[15] 於家,陈芸,刘静怡,等.基于OAT的空间多准则决策中的权重敏感性分析[J].资源科学,2014,36(9): 1 870-1 879.
YU Jia, CHEN Yun, LIU Jingyi, et al. One-at-a-time based weight sensitivity analysis in spatial multi-criteria decision making[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(9): 1 870-1 879.

考虑风险感知度和系统效率的应急瓶颈资源调度

Scheduling of emergency bottleneck resource considering risk perception and system efficiency

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨三军, 荆亚茹, 姜润发. 矿山救援队应急救援能力评价指标体系构建^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 180-188.
[2]	欧阳旭东, 支云翔, 王腾飞, 吴兵, 汪洋. 基于扩展式动态博弈的多船避碰决策模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 128-135.
[3]	刘松, 邵毅明, 彭勇, 肖云鹏. 应急救援物资多式联运路径优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(12): 152-157.
[4]	李彦瑾, 罗霞, 游云晴. 贫信息情况下的应急救援路径选择模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(8): 174-179.
[5]	李彦瑾, 罗霞. 基于Logistic曲线的路网脆弱性动态识别[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 28-33.
[6]	魏强，涂子学，周静生，周嘉男. 基于候选点集算法的应急设施网络布局优化[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(9): 172-.
[7]	吴之立，刘晓. 突发事件下城市关键基础设施应急策略研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(6): 168-.
[8]	徐格宁，冯晓蕾. 机械系统的风险概率与经济性安全评价方法研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(6): 69-.
[9]	陆柏，陈培，傅贵. 基于SEM的企业安全氛围诊断与测评研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(4): 22-.
[10]	王书明，何学秋，王恩元. 基于"流变-突变"理论的安全投入决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(11): 46-.
[11]	钱双彬，董军，陈方权. 隧道盾构下穿车站出入口数值仿真对比研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(3): 22-.
[12]	张子民，李琦. 应急撤离建模研究的现状、问题与发展趋势[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(10): 120-.
[13]	谢献忠，易伟建，王修勇，陈文新. 结构损伤诊断与系统时域辨识研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(6): 110-.
[14]	刘杨，马立，云美萍，彭国雄. 基于随机过程的城市应急车辆数量配置模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(5): 46-.
[15]	张安兵，高井祥，刘新侠，刘辉. 边坡变形时序非线性判定及混沌预测研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(4): 55-.