中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 180-188.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.08.025

• 应急技术与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

矿山救援队应急救援能力评价指标体系构建*

杨三军1,2 副教授, 荆亚茹2, 姜润发2   

  1. 1 中国矿业大学(北京) 管理学院,北京 100083;
    2 中国矿业大学(北京) 体育教研部,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-12 修回日期:2021-07-08 出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2022-02-28
  • 作者简介:杨三军 (1979—),男,湖南湘乡人,博士研究生,副教授,研究方向为应急(救援)管理与安全体育。E-mail:108947@cumtb.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重点项目资助(20ATY009);北京市社会科学基金资助(20YTB016)。

Construction of evaluation index system for emergency rescue capabilities of mine rescue teams

YANG Sanjun1,2, JING Yaru2, JIANG Runfa2   

  1. 1 School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
    2 Sports Teaching and Research Department, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2021-05-12 Revised:2021-07-08 Online:2021-08-28 Published:2022-02-28

摘要: 为有效评估矿山救援队应急救援能力,提升应急救援行动的科学性,分析矿山典型事故,确定矿山应急救援能力影响因素的维度;综合文献与专家意见设计调查问卷,并利用探索性因子分析检验问卷信效度,最终筛选确定应急救援能力指标;利用逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)构建救援能力评价模型,并应用于国家矿山应急救援队K1、K2、K3实际评价中。研究结果表明:矿山救援队应急救援能力从5个维度归纳出5个一级指标(指挥管理、组织建设、专业救援、综合体质、应急资源)和28个二级指标;利用所构建的评价模型评价国家矿山救援队的救援能力强弱排序为K2>K1>K3

关键词: 矿山救援队, 应急救援能力, 评价指标体系, 探索性因子分析, 逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)

Abstract: In order to effectively evaluate emergency rescue capabilities of mine rescue teams, and to develop more scientific rescue operations, dimensions of influencing factors on such capabilities were defined according to analysis on typical mine accidents. Then, a questionnaire was designed based on literature and expert opinions, its reliability and validity were tested by exploratory factor analysis, and indicators of emergency rescue capabilities were finally selected and determined. Finally, a capability evaluation model was established by utilizing TOPSIS, and applied to the actual case of national mine emergency rescue teams K1, K2 and K3. The results show that emergency rescue capability can be evaluated in five dimensions from 5 first-level indexes, namely command and management, organization construction, professional rescue, comprehensive physical fitness, emergency resources, and 28 second-level ones. And according to the evaluation model, the rescue teams rank as K2>K1>K3 in terms of their capabilities.

Key words: mine rescue, emergency rescue team, evaluation index system, exploratory factor analysis, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)

中图分类号: