IIF-ER方法在应急物流设施选址中的应用

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.09.031

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 183-188.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2018.09.031

IIF-ER方法在应急物流设施选址中的应用

谷玲玲, 耿秀丽副教授

上海理工大学管理学院,上海 200093

收稿日期:2018-06-11 修回日期:2018-08-09 出版日期:2018-09-28 发布日期:2020-09-28
作者简介:谷玲玲(1994—),女,江苏盐城人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为物流工程。E-mail:Lindygu520@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71301104);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助(20133120120002);上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(14YZ088)。

Application of interval intuitionistic fuzzy and evidence reasoning in location selection of emergency logistics facilities

GU Lingling, GENG Xiuli

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science of Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

Received:2018-06-11 Revised:2018-08-09 Online:2018-09-28 Published:2020-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决不确定性条件下的应急物流设施选址评估的问题,建立基于区间直觉模糊(IIF)与证据推理(ER)的设施选址模型。首先,针对指标评估的不确定性问题,采用区间直觉模糊数(IIFV)表达专家评价信息;然后,考虑到传统IIF在信息集成中存在信息丢失的问题,采用ER集成方法集成评估信息;其次,利用逼近理性解排序法(TOPSIS)对应急物流设施选址方案进行排序;最后,以某城市建立应急物流设施点为例,采用传统IIF信息集成方法与所提方法对比分析,验证模型的有效性。结果表明:所提方法能解决不确定性条件下的应急物流设施选址决策问题,同时也能保证决策质量。

关键词: 应急物流, 设施选址, 区间直觉模糊(IIF), 证据推理(ER), 逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)

Abstract: In order to solve the problem of emergency logistics facility location under uncertain conditions, an IIF-ER based model combining was built. For building the model, the interval intuitionistic fuzzy value (IIFV) was used to express the expert evaluation information in view of the uncertainty of index evaluation. Considering that the traditional IIF has the problem of information loss in information integration, the method of ER integration was used to integrate the evaluation information. The method of TOPSIS was used to sort the location of emergency logistics facilities. Finally, an example of establishing emergency logistics facilities in a certain city was given to verify the effectiveness of the model. The results show that the model can be used to solve the problem of emergency logistics facility location decision under uncertain conditions, at the same time, it can ensure the quality of decision-making and shorten the decision time.

Key words: emergency logistics, facility location, interval intuitionistic fuzzy(IIF), evidence reasoning (ER), technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)

中图分类号:

X913.4

谷玲玲, 耿秀丽. IIF-ER方法在应急物流设施选址中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 183-188.

GU Lingling, GENG Xiuli. Application of interval intuitionistic fuzzy and evidence reasoning in location selection of emergency logistics facilities[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(9): 183-188.

参考文献

[1] BOLOORI A A, FARAHANI R Z. Facility location dynamics: an overview of classifications and applications[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2012, 62(1): 408-420.
[2] 方磊, 何建敏. 应急系统优化选址的模型及其算法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2003, 18(1): 49-54.
FANG Lei, HE Jianmin. Model and algorithm of optimal location selection for Emergency system [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2003, 18(1): 49-54.
[3] 郭咏梅, 胡大伟, 珠兰,等. 考虑可靠性要素的应急物流设施选址分配问题的建模研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(2): 85-89.
GUO Yongmei, HU Dawei, ZHU Lan, et al. Research on modeling of location allocation of emergency logistics facilities considering reliability factors [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(2): 85-89.
[4] BOONMEE C, ARIMURA M, ASADA T. Facility location optimization model for emergency humanitarian logistics[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 24: 485-498.
[5] 陈刚, 张锦, 付江月. 不确定环境中多目标应急物流选址分配模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(12): 163-168.
CHEN Gang, ZHANG Jin, FU Jiangyue. Location allocation model of multi-objective emergency logistics in uncertain environment [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(12): 163-168.
[6] 李刚, 洪亚鹏, 高明贵. 基于改进的GRA-PDEA模型的应急系统优化选址[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2017, 47(10): 171-178.
LI Gang, HONG Yapeng, GAO Minggui. Optimal location of Emergency system based on improved GRA-PDEA model [J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2017, 47(10): 171-178.
[7] 方磊, 何建敏. 综合ahp和目标规划方法的应急系统选址规划模型[j]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2003, 23(12): 116-120.
FANG Lei, HE Jianmin. Location planning model of emergency system based on AHP and target programming [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2003, 23(12): 116-120.
[8] 赵远飞, 陈国华. 基于改进逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)法的应急系统优化选址模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(9): 22-28.
ZHAO Yuanfei, CHEN Guohua. Study on location optimizing model of emergency system based on improved TOPSIS method [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(9): 22-28.
[9] PHAM T Y, MA H M, YEO G T. Application of fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to locate logistics centers in vietnam: the logisticians' perspective [J]. Asian Journal of Shipping & Logistics, 2017, 33(4): 211-219.
[10] 李少年, 吴良刚. 基于模糊证据推理及改进TOPSIS的多属性群决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(6): 16-23.
LI Shaonian, WU Lianggang. Multi-attribute group decision making method based on fuzzy evidence reasoning and improved TOPSIS [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(6): 16-23.
[11] SHYI M C, ZHI Chenghuang. Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology [J]. Information Sciences, 2017, 381: 341-351.
[12] SEYED E M, AHMAD M. Multi-attribute group decision making approach based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology [J]. Soft Comput, 2017, 21: 5 061-5 080.
[13] LUDMILA D, PAYEL S. The operations on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory [J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 360:256-272.
[14] CHENG Yiwang, SHYI M C. Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method [J]. Information Sciences, 2017, 397:155-167.
[15] 徐泽水, 陈剑. 一种基于区间直觉判断矩阵的群决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 27(4): 126-133.
XU Zeshui, CHEN Jian. An approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices [J].Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(4): 126-133.
[16] YANG Jianbo, XU Dongling. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty[J]. Systems Man & Cybernetics Part A Systems & Humans IEEE Transactions on, 2002, 32(3): 289-304.
[17] 方磊. 基于偏好DEA的应急系统选址模型研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2006, 26(8): 116-122.
FANG Lei. Research on location model of emergency system based on preference DEA [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2006, 26(8): 116-122.
[18] LIU Hong, ZHANG Xiaohua. Study on location selection of multi-objective emergency logistics center based on AHP[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 15: 2 128-2 132.

IIF-ER方法在应急物流设施选址中的应用

Application of interval intuitionistic fuzzy and evidence reasoning in location selection of emergency logistics facilities

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邝雨婕, 赵佳虹. 连续时变风险下危险品储运选址-选线问题[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 185-191.
[2]	杨三军, 荆亚茹, 姜润发. 矿山救援队应急救援能力评价指标体系构建^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 180-188.
[3]	姜福川, 周师, 吴增彤, 钟基超, 张书豪, 张雪芳. 基于熵权-TOPSIS法的煤矿安全投入决策分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 24-29.
[4]	戢晓峰, 杨春丽, 郝京京, 覃文文. 国内外应急物流研究热点对比与展望^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 144-152.
[5]	吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, 刘增凯. 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.
[6]	陈刘瑜, 李希建, 毕娟, 华攸金, 魏泽云. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的冲击型煤与瓦斯突出倾向性预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 47-52.
[7]	张有洋, 朱昌锋, 韩桴. 异质决策者划分下应急物流路径多准则群决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(1): 168-173.
[8]	汪伟, 贾宝山, 祁云. 改进CRITIC修正G2-TOPSIS的钻孔自燃预测模型及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 26-31.
[9]	陈长坤, 陈以琴, 施波, 徐童. 雨洪灾害情境下城市韧性评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 1-6.
[10]	张进峰, 何芸枫, 吴小红, 刘永森. 库区水上应急救助设施选址多目标优化模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 175-181.
[11]	李志, 李政祥, 周愉峰, 邱晗光. 考虑中断情景与防御的应急物资储备库LIP模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 90-95.
[12]	宋英华, 宁晶婧, 吕伟, 杜丽敬. 震后初期应急物流公私协同的动态LAP模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(3): 173-178.
[13]	黄文成, 帅斌, 孙妍, 李美霖, 庞璐. 熵-TOPSIS-耦合协调法评价铁路危险品运输系统风险[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 134-138.
[14]	王玮强, 张春民, 朱昌锋, 方刚. 基于累积前景理论的应急物流路径选择方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 169-175.
[15]	庞浩，刘杨，袁昀，朱思洪. 城市应急车辆配置决策支持系统结构设计与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(7): 151-.