一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法*

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.014

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 97-104.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.10.014

一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*

吴耀男¹, 林雷², 任新温², 王龙庭^**1 高级实验师, 刘志慧¹, 刘增凯¹ 副教授

1 中国石油大学(华东) 机电工程学院,山东青岛266580;
2 中国石油集团海洋工程有限公司,天津 300280

收稿日期:2021-07-15 修回日期:2021-09-12 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2022-04-28
通讯作者: ** 王龙庭(1983—),男,江西吉安人,博士研究生,高级实验师,研究方向为油气安全工程。E-mail: wanglt@upc.edu.cn。
作者简介:吴耀男 (1995—),男,山西吕梁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为油气安全工程。 E-mail:18435132291@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(51779267);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(19CX02025A)。

An improved FMEA method based on logical structure number

WU Yaonan¹, LIN Lei², REN Xinwen², WANG Longting¹, LIU Zhihui¹, LIU Zengkai¹

1 College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao Shandong 266580, China;
2 China National Petroleum Corporation Offshore Engineering Co. Ltd., Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2021-07-15 Revised:2021-09-12 Online:2021-10-28 Published:2022-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决传统故障模式和影响分析(FMEA)存在的主观误差、结构转换和逻辑混乱等问题,提出一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法,该方法利用模糊集和层次分析法(AHP)降低主观误差,通过事故树分析(FTA)产生逻辑结构数,利用逻辑结构数实现故障原因向故障模式的转换,并通过逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)处理数据,得到各个故障模式的风险优先数,使FMEA具有逻辑性和整体性;将该方法应用在浮式生产储油卸油轮(FPSO)三相分离器的研究上,验证该方法的有效性。结果表明:采用该方法找出的三相分离器的主要故障模式更加准确,更加贴合生产实际,更利于工程人员操作。

关键词: 逻辑结构数, 改进型故障模式和影响分析(FMEA), 层次分析法(AHP), 逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS), 浮式生产储油卸油轮(FPSO)三相分离器

Abstract: In order to solve problems of subjective error, structure conversion and logic confusion in traditional FMEA, an improved FMEA analysis method based on logical structure number was proposed. Fuzzy sets and AHP were used to reduce subjective errors, generates logical structure numbers through FTA analysis, logical structure numbers was used to realize conversion of failure causes to failure modes, and data was processed through TOPSIS to obtain risk priority number of each failure mode to make FMEA analysis have logical and integral. Method was applied to research of FPSO three-phase separator to verify effectiveness of method. The results show that main failure mode of three-phase separator found by this method is more accurate, more suitable for production practice, and more conducive to operation of engineering personnel.

Key words: logical structure number, improved failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), floating production storage and offloading(FPSO)three-phase separator

中图分类号:

X928.03

吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, 刘增凯. 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.

WU Yaonan, LIN Lei, REN Xinwen, WANG Longting, LIU Zhihui, LIU Zengkai. An improved FMEA method based on logical structure number[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 97-104.

参考文献

[1] NAZLI G M, SERKAN A. Risk analysis for occupational safety and health in the textile industry: integration of FMEA, FTA, and BIFPET methods [J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2019, 72(5): 222-240.
[2] CHANDRASEKHAR P, SUBHRAJIT D, JESSICA R. Risk priority number for bridge failures [J]. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2020, 25(2): 04020010.
[3] 王睿, 朱江洪, 李延来. 基于共识模型与IN-TODIM的FMEA风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 125-131.
WANG Rui, ZHU Jianghong, LI Yanlai. FMEA approach for risk evaluation based on consensus model and IN-TODIM [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(9): 125-131.
[4] 牟能冶, 邱忠权. 基于FMEA与ELECTRE-Ⅲ的CTCS-3风险评估研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(4): 163-168.
MU Nengye, QIU Zhongquan. Risk assessment of CTCS-3 train control system based on FMEA and ELECTRE -Ⅲ [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(4): 163-168.
[5] KUTLU A C, MEHMET E. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 39(1): 61-67.
[6] SACHDEVA A D, KUMER P K. Multi-factor failure mode criticality analysis using TOPSIS [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 2009, 5(8): 1-9.
[7] 安相华, 于靖博, 蔡卫国. 基于混合多属性决策和关联分析的模糊粗糙FMEA评估方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(11): 2 613-2 621.
AN Xianghua, YU Jingbo, CAI Weiguo. Fuzzy rough FMEA evaluation method based on hybrid multi-attribute decision and correlative analysis [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2016, 22(11): 2 613-2 621.
[8] 孙丽萍, 康济川, 刘子健, 等. 海上风机的模糊关联失效模式及其影响分析[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2016, 37(4): 487-491.
SUN Liping, KANG Jichuan, LIU Zijian, et al. Fuzzy theory-based correlated FMEA of offshore wind turbines [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2016, 37(4):487-491.
[9] 朱江洪, 李国芳, 王睿, 等. 地铁列车非正常停车FMEA风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(2): 145-150.
ZHU Jianghong, LI Guofang, WANG Rui, et al. FMEA based assessment of risk that metro train stops abnormally [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(2):145-150.
[10] LIU C T, HWANG S L, LIN I K . Safety analysis of combined FMEA and FTA with computer software assistance-take photovoltaic plant for example [J]. IFAC Proceeding Volumes, 2013, 46(9):2 151-2 155.
[11] PEETERS J F W, BASTEN R J I,TINGA T. Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2018, 172(4): 36-44.
[12] 陈刘瑜, 李希建, 毕娟, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的冲击型煤与瓦斯突出倾向性预测[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(4): 47-52.
CHEN Liuyu, LI Xijian, BI Juan, et al. Prediction of coal-gas outburst induced by rock-burst tendency based on AHP-TOPSIS [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(4):47-52.
[13] CHEN L,TAYLOR P H,DRAPER S, et al. Response based design metocean conditions for a permanently moored FPSO during tropical cyclones: estimation of greenwater risk [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 89(8): 115-127.

[1]	邝雨婕, 赵佳虹. 连续时变风险下危险品储运选址-选线问题[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 185-191.
[2]	熊钰, 孔德中, 杨胜利, 吴桂义, 左宇军, 程占博. 大倾角工作面煤壁稳定性的云模型综合辨识[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 144-151.
[3]	黄杰, 张显峰. 以南疆为例的区域暴恐袭击风险评估^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(2): 192-199.
[4]	杨三军, 荆亚茹, 姜润发. 矿山救援队应急救援能力评价指标体系构建^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 180-188.
[5]	姜福川, 周师, 吴增彤, 钟基超, 张书豪, 张雪芳. 基于熵权-TOPSIS法的煤矿安全投入决策分析^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 24-29.
[6]	王刚, 商荦真, 刘学麟, 唐礼, 程前. 采用AHP-熵权法的巷道启封中毒窒息致因研究^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(7): 187-192.
[7]	刘大山, 陈晓春, 多英全, 师立晨. 化工园区地震Na-Tech事件快速风险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(2): 127-134.
[8]	杨天姿, 王铁骊, 彭恒明, 段海林. 小微企业生产安全事故应急脆弱性评价^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(12): 176-183.
[9]	吴仁彪, 何宇翔, 贾云飞. 基于改进层次分析法的重点人员风险评价方法^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 112-118.
[10]	姜涛, 张玉龙, 李士博, 李政, 邱海良. 大型多功能救援属具的综合性能评价体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 102-108.
[11]	朱冠吉, 刘迪, 孙强, 周子超. 铁路机车驾驶员职业安全适应性评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 64-70.
[12]	郑晓波. 基于AHP的铁路信息系统风险评价指标体系[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 139-145.
[13]	周雪, 左忠义, 程伟. 基于组合赋权云模型的铁路旅客运输安全评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(S1): 158-164.
[14]	田睿, 孟海东, 陈世江, 王创业, 石磊. RF-AHP-云模型下岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(7): 166-172.
[15]	邓伟, 夏正洪. 高原机场应急保障能力评价方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 172-177.

一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型FMEA方法^*

An improved FMEA method based on logical structure number

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价