中国安全科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 10-16.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.08.002

• 安全系统学 • 上一篇    下一篇

航空安全员安全保障能力评价研究

王永刚1 教授, 张迪2, 刘晓璐3   

  1. 1 中国民航大学 安全学部,天津 300300;
    2 中国民航大学 经管学院,天津 300300;
    3 中国民航局 公安局,北京 100710
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-29 修回日期:2019-07-04
  • 作者简介:王永刚 (1963—),男,天津人,博士,教授,中国民航大学安全科学与工程学部主任,国家注册质量管理体系主任审核员、安全工程师,主要从事系统安全管理,人因工程与行为管理以及质量、安全管理体系等方面的研究。E-mail:caucwyg@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    2019年民航安全能力项目(ASSA2019/02)。

Study on evaluation of security safeguarding ability of aviation security personnel

WANG Yonggang1, ZHANG Di2, LIU Xiaolu3   

  1. 1 Safety Division,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China;
    2 Economics and Management College,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China;
    3 Public Security Bureau,Civil Aviation Administration of China,Beijing 100710, China
  • Received:2019-04-29 Revised:2019-07-04

摘要: 为准确、客观地评价航空安全员的安全保障能力,在理论分析和航空安全员工作分析的基础上,提出服务意识、敬业意识和安全意识等34个安全保障能力特征要素,并将其作为二级评价指标;然后用探索性因子分析(EFA)法提炼出3个一级指标,进而采用层次分析法(AHP)确定各指标权重;最后以模糊综合评价法为基础,建立航空安全员安全保障能力评价模型,并进行实证分析。结果表明:评价模型的结果与航空安全员的实际安全保障能力相符,可有效地避免出现安全员等级与其实际能力不一致的情况。

关键词: 航空安全员, 安全保障能力, 层次分析法(AHP), 探索性因子分析(EFA), 模糊综合评价

Abstract: To accurately and objectively evaluate the security safeguarding ability of aviation security personnel, based on the theoretical analysis and the analysis of their work, 34 security safeguarding ability characteristic elements were proposed as secondary evaluation index, such as service consciousness, professional consciousness and security consciousness. Then three first-level indicators were put forward by exploratory factor analysis and the weight of each evaluation index was determined through AHP. Finally the security safeguarding ability evaluation model was established by the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and an empirical analysis on the model was made. The results show that the evaluation results of the proposed security safeguarding ability evaluation model are consistent with aviation security personnel's actual security safeguarding ability, and that the model proposed can effectively avoid the inconsistency between the current level of aviation security personnel and his or her actual ability.

Key words: aviation security personnel, security safeguarding ability, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号: