化工装置泄漏频率数据源比较研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.005

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 35-40.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2021.03.005

化工装置泄漏频率数据源比较研究

华俊杰¹ 高级工程师, 申满对¹ 高级工程师, 宋贤生^2,3 高级工程师

1 中石化广州工程有限公司,广东广州 510700;
2 上海傲典企业管理咨询有限公司,上海 200241;
3 上海晏谷科技有限公司,上海 200241

收稿日期:2020-12-06 修回日期:2021-02-02 出版日期:2021-03-28 发布日期:2021-12-20
作者简介:华俊杰 (1978—),男,陕西洋县人,本科,高级工程师,注册安全工程师,主要从事过程安全和定量风险分析技术方面的工作。E-mail:huajj.lpec@sinopec.com。

Study on comparison of leak frequency sources in chemical plants

HUA Junjie¹, SHEN Mandui¹, SONG Xiansheng^2,3

1 Sinopec Guangzhou Engineering Co. Ltd., Guangzhou Guangdong 510700, China;
2 Shanghai Aodian Enterprise Management Consulting Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200241, China;
3 Shanghai e-Valley Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200241, China

Received:2020-12-06 Revised:2021-02-02 Online:2021-03-28 Published:2021-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为降低泄漏频率对化工装置定量风险分析结果不确定性的影响,从覆盖设备设施类型、基准泄漏频率和频率计算模型等方面,比较分析中国、英国健康安全管理局、挪威船级社、国际油气生产商联合会(IOGP)发布的泄漏频率数据源,筛选出更适合计算化工装置泄漏频率的数据源;并以某化工装置2个泄漏单元为例,比较《危险化学品生产装置和储存设施外部安全防护距离确定方法》和IOGP这2个数据源的泄漏频率计算结果和定量风险分析结果。研究结果表明:IOGP发布的泄漏频率属于国际权威机构发布的开放数据源,在数据来源、设备设施类型、计算模型和结果可靠度方面具有领先优势;化工装置泄漏频率修正和定量风险分析可优先使用IOGP泄漏频率数据源。

关键词: 化工装置, 泄漏频率, 数据源, 定量风险分析, 工艺设备设施

Abstract: In order to reduce influence of leakage frequency on uncertainty of quantitative risk analysis results of chemical plant, leakage frequency data sources published by China, UK health and safety authority, norske veritas and International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (IOGP) were compared and analyzed from aspects of covering equipment and facility types, benchmark leakage frequency and frequency calculation model. Taking two leakage units of a chemical plant as an example, leakage frequency calculation results and quantitative risk analysis results of two data sources, national standard for Determining External Safety Protection Distance of Hazardous Chemical Production Plant and Storage Facility and IOGP were compared. The results show that leakage frequency published by IOGP belongs to open data sources published by international authoritative institutions, and has a leading advantage in data sources, equipment and facility types, computing models and reliability of results. IOGP leakage frequency data source can be used as a priority for chemical plant leakage frequency correction and quantitative risk analysis.

Key words: chemical plants, leak frequency, data source, quantitative risk analysis, process equipment and facilities

中图分类号:

X937

华俊杰, 申满对, 宋贤生. 化工装置泄漏频率数据源比较研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 35-40.

HUA Junjie, SHEN Mandui, SONG Xiansheng. Study on comparison of leak frequency sources in chemical plants[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(3): 35-40.

参考文献

[1] LANDUCCI G, PALTRINIERI N. A methodology for frequency tailorization dedicated to the oil and gas sector[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 104: 123-141.
[2] KODOTH M, AOYAMA S, SAKAMOTO J, et al. Leak frequency analysis for hydrogen based technology using Bayesian and frequentist methods[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 136: 148-156.
[3] KODOTH M, SHIBUTANI T, F.KHALIL Y, et al. Verification of appropriate life parameters in risk and reliability quantifications of process hazards[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 127: 314-320.
[4] 汪航,王海清,刘芳. 基于贝叶斯方法的石化设备失效数据推断技术研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2014, 14(6): 5-7.
WANG Hang, WANG Haiqing, LIU Fang. Research on inference and forecasting technology for petrochemical equipment failure based on Bayesian method [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2014, 14(6): 5-7.
[5] 王全国, 汤银才, 管强. 石化装置气体泄漏频率的贝叶斯分析[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2016, 35(4): 594-602.
WANG Quanguo, TANG Yincai, GUAN Qiang. Bayesian analysis for gas leak frequency in petrochemical equipment [J], Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2016, 35(4): 594-602.
[6] 陈国华, 曾涛, 杨运锋, 等. 泥石流冲击下立式储罐失效概率分析[J].中国安全科学学报, 2017,27(11): 55-60.
CHEN Guohua, ZENG Tao, YANG Yunfeng, et al. Analysis of failure probability of vertical tank under debris flow impact[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(11): 55-60.
[7] 宋肖苗, 杨剑锋, 陈良超, 等. 多层次灰色综合评价法在储罐失效概率评估中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 157-161.
SONG Xiaomiao, YANG Jianfeng, CHEN Liangchao, et al. Application of grey multi-hierarchy comprehensive evaluation method in failure probability assessment of storage tanks[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(11): 157-161.
[8] 王金江,王舒辉,张兴,等.基于RBI技术的储气库分离器风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(2): 21-27.
WANG Jinjiang, WANG Shuihui, ZHANG Xing, et al. Risk analysis of gas storage separator based on RBI technology[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(2): 21-27.
[9] 于立见,多英全,师立晨,等. 定量风险评价中泄漏概率的确定方法探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2007, 3(6): 27-30.
YU Lijian, DUO Yingquan, SHI Lichen, et al. Method for determing probabilities of leaks in quantitative risk assessment[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2007, 3(6): 27-30.
[10] Health and Safety Executive of United Kingdom (UK HSE). Failure rate and event data for use within risk assessment [R], 2019.
[11] DNV&Statoil ASA. Energy report offshore QRA-Standardized hydrocarbon leak frequencies[R], 2009.
[12] DNV G L. Failure frequency guidance: process equipment leak frequency data for use in QRA[R], 2012.
[13] International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (IOGP). Risk assessment data directory: process release frequencies[R],2019.
[14] International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (IOGP). Risk assessment data directory: storage incident frequencies[R],2010.
[15] National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Reference manual Bevi risk assessment version 3.2[R], 2009.
[16] GB/T37243—2019, 危险化学品生产装置和储存设施外部安全防护距离确定方法[S].
GB/T37243-2019, Determination method of external safety distance for hazardous chemicals production units and storage installations[S].

化工装置泄漏频率数据源比较研究

Study on comparison of leak frequency sources in chemical plants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	田宇忠, 范洪军, 涂环, 李俊荣. 考虑多米诺效应的LNG事故后果定量风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 68-73.
[2]	何睿, 陈国明, 李新宏, 沈孝鱼, 徐长航, 姜盛玉. 不完全信息条件下的FPSO油气泄漏风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 64-69.
[3]	马磊，李永树. 城市天然气管网预警系统的研究与实现[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(9): 171-.
[4]	王晶禹，陈健，刘雪岭. 在役长输管道动态数据源组件(ADO)技术在剩余强度安全评定系统中的实现[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(5): 109-.
[5]	王晓宁，吕保和，王宇庆，雷鑫. 在役化工装置安全评价指标体系构建方法的探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(7): 150-.
[6]	孟亦飞，蒋军成. 化工装置火灾、爆炸、毒物扩散危险快速辨识方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(6): 108-.
[7]	李剑峰，刘茂，王东东，王靖文. 公共场所泄漏、中毒事故的个人风险水平的估计[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(12): 13-.