中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 214-220.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.2167

• 职业卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

面向特情的航线飞行员视觉注意分配研究

汪磊1(), 王朔1, 高杉1, 李姝2, 吴昌旭3   

  1. 1 中国民航大学 安全科学与工程学院,天津 300300
    2 中国民航大学 飞行分校,天津 300300
    3 清华大学 工业工程系,北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-16 修回日期:2022-11-14 出版日期:2023-01-28 发布日期:2023-07-28
  • 作者简介:

    汪磊 (1982—),男,安徽霍山人,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事航空安全与人因方面的研究。E-mail:

    李姝,讲师

    吴昌旭,教授

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(32071063)

A study on airline pilots' visual attention allocation during emergency

WANG Lei1(), WANG Shuo1, GAO Shan1, LI Shu2, WU Changxu3   

  1. 1 School of Safety Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
    2 Flight Academy, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
    3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2022-08-16 Revised:2022-11-14 Online:2023-01-28 Published:2023-07-28

摘要:

为降低飞行中人因事件的发生比例,保障飞行安全,面向进近过程中飞机发动机火警处置任务,开展模拟飞行试验,探究飞行特情中飞行员视觉注意分配情况;记录被试在4个兴趣区域(AOI)的5项视觉注意分配指标,同时,记录试验中被试的决策行为和飞行绩效指标;结果显示,火警发生前后,飞行员被试在主飞行显示器(PFD,即AOI 2)上的5个视觉注意分配指标均显著高于其他AOI;在火警前阶段,被试在主火警灯(即AOI 1)的注视点数(FC)、注视时间(FT)、FC占比(PFC)、FT占比(PFT)和平均注视时间(AFD)值显著低于导航显示器(ND,即AOI 3)和发动机显示和机组警告系统(EICAS,即AOI 4),而在火警阶段,AOI 1的FC、FT、PFC和PFT显著高于AOI 4;机长组被试在PFD上的 FC、FT、PFC和 PFT显著低于副驾驶组;机长组更多选择落地后执行火警记忆项目。研究结果表明:飞行特情中,飞行员的视觉注意分配仍服从驾驶—导航—交流—系统管理任务优先规则;主火警灯故障会对飞行员的注意分配造成干扰;飞行经验可以改善飞行员的视觉注意分配。

关键词: 飞行特情, 航线飞行员, 视觉注意分配, 兴趣区域(AOI), 飞行绩效

Abstract:

In order to reduce the percentage of human events in flight and guarantee the flight safety, this study carried out the flight simulation test in which pilots were required to deal with the fire warn and engine 1-fire occurring in the final approach, and investigated the visual attention allocation of pilots during that flight emergency. And then chose fixation counts (FC), fixation time (FT), percentage of FC(PFC), percentage of FT(PFT) and averaged fixation duration (AFD) in 4 AOIs as the visual attention allocation indicators, and flight decision-making and flight performance indicators were also recorded during the experiment. As the results showed all the attention allocation indicators in AOI 2 (Primary Flight Display, PDF) were larger than those in other AOIs before and during the fire warning emergency. And before the emergency, all of the values of FC, FT, PFC, PFT and AFD in AOI 1 (Fire Warning) were lower than those in AOI 3 (Navigation Display, ND) and AOI 4 (Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System, EICAS), however, the value of FC, FT, PFC, PFT and AFD in AOI 1 were higher than AOI 4 during the emergency. And captains had lower value of FC, FT, PFC and PFT in AOI 2 than first officers. Besides they were more likely to implement the memory items after landing. As the results suggest, pilots' visual attention allocation is consistent with Aviate - Navigate - Communicate - System Management task priority rule during flight emergency, and then the failure of the fire warning disturbs the pilot's visual attention allocation, but flight experience can improve pilots' visual attention allocation.

Key words: flight emergency, airline pilots, visual attention allocation, area of interest (AOI), flight performance