沉管隧道内车厢火羽流的临界风速研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.02.0696

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 75-81.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.02.0696

沉管隧道内车厢火羽流的临界风速研究

唐飞¹(), 刘紫玮¹, 孙协鹏¹, 刘帅², 徐童³

¹ 中国科学技术大学火灾科学国家重点实验室,安徽合肥 230026
² 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司,重庆 400067
³ 中南大学防灾科学与安全技术研究所,湖南长沙 410075

收稿日期:2022-09-20 修回日期:2022-12-15 出版日期:2023-02-28 发布日期:2023-08-28
作者简介:
唐飞 (1983—),男,安徽芜湖人,博士,研究员,主要从事隧道火灾和公共安全等方面的研究。E-mail: ftang@ustc.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3005201); 国家自然科学基金资助(52076066); 国家自然科学基金资助(52211530053); 重庆市自然科学基金资助(cstc2021jcyj-msxmX1052)

Study on critical ventilation velocity induced by ejected fire of carriage in immersed tunnel

TANG Fei¹(), LIU Ziwei¹, SUN Xiepeng¹, LIU Shuai², XU Tong³

¹ State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei Anhui 230027,China
² China Merchants Chongqing Communications Technology Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing, 400067,China
³ Institute of Disaster Prevention Science and Safety Technology, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410075,China

Received:2022-09-20 Revised:2022-12-15 Online:2023-02-28 Published:2023-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究纵向通风与侧向集中排烟协同作用下,沉管隧道内车厢火羽流的临界控制风速特征,首先,建立1∶8缩尺寸隧道试验模型;然后,选取3种车厢开口尺寸及9组火源功率,并考虑侧向集中排烟系统开启和关闭2种状态,采集沉管隧道内不同纵向风速下顶棚烟气温度数据;同时,通过火灾动力学模拟软件(FDS)模拟沉管隧道内车厢火羽流的速度场和温度场分布特征;最后,分析临界风速演化的物理影响机制。结果表明:无论侧向集中排烟系统是否开启,隧道顶棚下方烟气最大温升均会随纵向风速增加而下降,同时隧道内烟气逆流长度也会不断缩短直至为0;随隧道内车厢火源功率的增加,临界风速均呈现先增大后不变的趋势;在相同火源功率条件下,侧向排烟系统开启时对应的临界风速明显大于其关闭的情况;在侧向排烟与纵向通风协同作用下,随火源功率增加,沉管隧道车厢火羽流临界风速呈现先增加、后不变的分段函数关系。

关键词: 沉管隧道, 车厢火羽流, 临界风速, 纵向通风, 侧向集中排烟

Abstract:

For studying the critical velocity characteristics of smoke control induced by carriage fire plume under the synergy effect of longitudinal ventilation and lateral concentrated smoke extraction in immersed tunnel, a 1∶8 reduced-scale test model was firstly established. Based on 3 carriage opening sizes, 9 fire heat release rates and 2 states (on and off) of lateral smoke exhaust system, the smoke temperature under the immersed tunnel ceiling with different longitudinal velocity was collected. Meantime, the distribution characteristics of velocity and temperature field of ejected fire in immersed tunnel were simulated by FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator). Finally, the physical influence mechanism of critical velocity evolution was analyzed. The results show that whether the lateral concentrated smoke extraction system is open or not, the smoke maximum temperature under ceiling decreases significantly, and the smoke back-layering length continues to shorten with the increasing longitudinal velocity. Moreover, the critical velocity shows the increasing section firstly and then remains unchanged trend with the increasing fire heat release rate of carriage fire in tunnel. Under the synergetic effect of lateral smoke exhaust and longitudinal ventilation, the critical velocity of carriage fire in immersed tube tunnel increases with the increasing heat release rate, which shows a piecewise function relationship of first increasing, then unchanged.

Key words: immersed tunnel, carriage fire plume, critical ventilation velocity, longitudinal ventilation, lateral concentrated smoke extraction

唐飞, 刘紫玮, 孙协鹏, 刘帅, 徐童. 沉管隧道内车厢火羽流的临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(2): 75-81.

TANG Fei, LIU Ziwei, SUN Xiepeng, LIU Shuai, XU Tong. Study on critical ventilation velocity induced by ejected fire of carriage in immersed tunnel[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(2): 75-81.

图/表 9

图1

图2

表1

试验工况

试验工况	v₁ /(m·s^-1)	v₂ /(m·s^-1)	车厢开口尺寸S/ (W × H: m × m)	$Q ·$ /kW
001—108	0 (关闭) 3 (开启)	0.57, 0.67,0.76, 0.85, 0.98, 1.05	0.15×0.15	15.5, 23.25, 31, 38.75, 46.5, 54.25, 62, 69.75, 77.5
109—216		0.62, 0.71, 0.78, 0.84, 0.88, 0.93	0.10×0.15
217—324		0.62, 0.71, 0.84, 0.92, 0.97, 1.01	0.15×0.10

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 16

[1]	李涛, 谢玮, 张玉春, 等. 水雾强化隧道火灾火焰现象试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27 (3): 37-41. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.007
	LI Tao, XIE Wei, ZHANG Yuchun, et al. Experimental study on flame strengthening with water mist in tunnel fires[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27 (3): 37-41. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.03.007
[2]	徐童, 唐飞, 何清. 隧道内贴壁火顶棚射流温度及火焰特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7):93-97. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.2080
	XU Tong, TANG Fei, HE Qing. Study on temperature and fame characteristics of ceiling jet induced by wall-attached fire in a tunnel[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(7): 93-97. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.07.2080
[3]	THOMAS P H. The movement of smoke in horizontal passages against an air flow[J]. Fire Research Technical Paper, 1968, 7(1):1-8.
[4]	OKA Y, ATKINSON G T. Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1995, 25(4): 305-322. doi: 10.1016/0379-7112(96)00007-0
[5]	LI Yingzhen, LEI Bo, INGASON H. Study of critical velocity and back-layering length in longitudinally ventilated tunnel fires[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2011, 45(6/7/8): 361-370. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.07.003
[6]	WU Yang, BAKAR M Z A. Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires using longitudinal ventilation systems:a study of the critical velocity[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2000, 35(4): 363-390. doi: 10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00031-X
[7]	MENG Na, HU Xiangming, TIAN Mengya. Effect of blockage on critical ventilation velocity in longitudinally ventilated tunnel fires[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020:DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2020.103580.
[8]	姜学鹏, 谢智云, 于思维, 等. 水下V形坡隧道烟气温度纵向衰减研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 74-80.
	JIANG Xuepeng, XIE Zhiyun, YU Siwei, et al. Study on longitudinal decay of flue gas temperature in underwater V-shaped slope tunnels[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(9): 74-80.
[9]	郭庆华, 朱合华, 闫治国. 顶部开口自然通风隧道火灾竖井排烟效率研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2021, 40(5): 661-664.
	GUO Qinghua, ZHU Hehua, YAN Zhiguo. Studies on the smoke exhaust efficiency of the vertical shaft in naturally ventilated tunnel fires[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(5): 661-664.
[10]	INGASON H, LI Yingzhen, LÖNNERMARK A. Tunnel fire dynamics[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2014:349-352.
[11]	钟委, 孙超鹏, 马文辉, 等. 隧道内顶棚和侧向机械排烟效果对比[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2021, 40(5): 639-643.
	ZHONG Wei, SUN Chaopeng, MA Wenhui, et al. Comparison of smoke exhaust effect between ceiling and lateral mechanical smoke exhaust in tunnel[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(5): 639-643.
[12]	ZHU Yuantao, TANG Fei, HUANG Yajun. Experimental study on the smoke plug-holing phenomenon and criteria in a tunnel under the lateral smoke extraction[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022:DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104330. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104330
[13]	QUINTIERE J G. Scaling applications in fire research[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1989, 15(1): 3-29. doi: 10.1016/0379-7112(89)90045-3
[14]	TANG Fei, HU Peng, HE Qing, et al. Effect of sidewall on the flame extension characteristics beneath a ceiling induced by carriage fire in a channel[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2021, 223: 202-215. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.09.020
[15]	MCGRATTAN K, MCDERMOTT R, HOSTIKKA S, et al. Fire dynamics simulator version 5[M]. Washington: National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication, 2010: 222.
[16]	COANDA H. Device for deflecting a stream of elastic fluid projected into an elastic fluid:US Patent, No. 2052869[P]. 1936.

沉管隧道内车厢火羽流的临界风速研究

Study on critical ventilation velocity induced by ejected fire of carriage in immersed tunnel

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 16

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高云骥, 罗越扬, 李智胜, 张玉春, 喻洋阳, 李涛. 分岔隧道火灾烟气回流长度及温度分布试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(3): 109-115.
[2]	姚勇征, 宋恪斌, 史聪灵, 任飞, 李建, 车洪磊. 纵向通风下T型分岔隧道火灾烟气蔓延特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(10): 115-120.
[3]	姜学鹏, 陈欣格, 郭昆. 侧部点式排烟隧道火灾临界风速研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(3): 105-111.
[4]	毛军, 郗艳红, 胡家鹏, 祝岚, 林振瑶, 蔡煜. 分离式深埋地铁车站的火灾烟气运动及防控[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(6): 76-82.
[5]	牛国庆，张伟. 顺煤层钻孔风力排渣临界风速及压力损失研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(11): 60-.
[6]	周庆，倪天晓，周湘川. 纵向通风下坡度隧道火灾烟气特性数值模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(3): 42-.
[7]	徐志胜，李冬，姜学鹏，赵红莉，李洪. 纵向通风隧道内火灾温度场分布规律研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(3): 51-.
[8]	刘瑞霞，杨庆山. 薄膜结构的气弹动力失稳临界风速[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(6): 95-.
[9]	刘瑞霞，杨庆山. 薄膜结构风致振动研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2003, 13(9): 27-.