中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 62-69.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.01.0162

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

民航员工安全信息自愿报告意愿的促进路径:基于模糊集定性比较分析

郑秀梅(), 马国毓   

  1. 中国民航大学 交通科学与工程学院,天津 300300
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-12 修回日期:2023-11-14 出版日期:2024-01-28
  • 作者简介:

    郑秀梅 (1989—),女,辽宁锦州人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事航空安全管理、交通运输规划与管理等方面的研究。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费项目(3122019015)

Promotion path of civil aviation employees' willingness to share safety information: based on fsQCA

ZHENG Xiumei(), MA Guoyu   

  1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
  • Received:2023-08-12 Revised:2023-11-14 Published:2024-01-28

摘要:

为探究民航员工安全信息自愿报告意愿的作用路径,基于个人-环境匹配理论,构建个体特征和组织环境影响员工自愿报告意愿的多条件联动模型,基于178份调查问卷,应用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法开展验证。结果表明:安全信息自愿报告意愿的产生不是认知水平、工作嵌入、职业身份认同、领导支持和安全文化等单一条件促发的结果,而是由多个条件共同作用,高水平安全信息自愿报告意愿的促进模式有3个,分别为:员工自主驱动型,核心条件是员工的高认知水平、高工作嵌入和高职业身份认同;领导员工共鸣型,核心条件是员工的高认知水平、高职业身份认同、工作嵌入不足和组织的高领导支持;领导支持牵引型,核心条件是组织的高领导支持和安全文化缺失。

关键词: 航空安全信息, 自愿报告意愿, 模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA), 个体特征, 组织环境

Abstract:

In order to explore the promotion path of civil aviation employees' willingness to share safety information, a multi-condition linkage model was constructed based on the theory of Person-Environment Fit, which presented the impact of individual characteristics and organizational environment on employees' willingness to share safety information. On the basis, model validation was carried out using fsQCA method based on 178 survey questionnaires. The results show that willingness to share safety information is not driven by a single condition, such as individual cognition level, job embeddedness, professional identity, leadership support, and safety culture, but rather the result of multiple conditions. There are three models for promoting higher levels of willingness to share safety information. The first is employee autonomy-driven model, which has as its core conditions high individual cognitive, high job embeddedness, and high professional identity. The second is the resonance-driven model, the core conditions of which are high individual cognitive, high professional identity, high support from leaders, and insufficient job embeddedness. The third is the leadership support-driven model, whose core conditions are high support from leaders and the absence of safety culture.

Key words: aviation safety information, willingness to voluntarily report, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), individual characteristics, organizational environment

中图分类号: