基于社会正义的风险传播与可持续发展耦合机制

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.09.0415

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 27-33.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.09.0415

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

基于社会正义的风险传播与可持续发展耦合机制

徐新龙¹^,²(), 陈妤婕³, 刘舜佳⁴^,^**()

¹ 湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南长沙 410081
² 湖南师范大学交叉科学研究院,湖南长沙 410081
³ 澳门科技大学酒店与旅游管理学院,澳门 999078
⁴ 湖南农业大学商学院,湖南长沙 410128

收稿日期:2024-03-02 修回日期:2024-06-15 出版日期:2024-09-28
通信作者:
^** 刘舜佳(1980—),男,湖南茶陵人,博士,教授,主要从事国际贸易风险与安全分析等方面的研究。E-mail: 3128217928@qq.com。
作者简介:
徐新龙 (1987—),男,湖南耒阳人,博士,副教授,主要从事风险管理、舆情风险传播与感知、环境风险分析等方面的研究。E-mail: xu78744359@gmail.com。
陈妤婕，助理教授
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(72371099); 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(21YJC630147); 湖南省自然科学基金资助(2023JJ30421); 湖南师范大学交叉科学研究团队项目(2022JC204)

Coupling mechanisms of risk communication and sustainable development based on social justice

XU Xinlong¹^,²(), CHEN Yujie³, LIU Shunjia⁴^,^**()

¹ College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha Hunan 410081, China
² Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University, Changsha Hunan 410081, China
³ Faculty of Hospitality and Tourism Management,Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China
⁴ School of Business, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha Hunan 410128, China

Received:2024-03-02 Revised:2024-06-15 Published:2024-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为识别突发性事件风险传播中社会正义的不同维度对于促进社会可持续发展的作用,首先,通过构建风险正义理论框架,阐释社会正义的4个维度:程序性、互动性、分配性和矫正性正义与可持续的社会、生态、空间及时间特征的耦合机制;然后,将风险正义定义为在治理和管理突发性事件时利益相关方参与权利的公平合理品质;最后,详细分析突发性事件风险管理准则《仙台减少灾害风险框架2015—2030》的内容,用以阐释风险正义框架的前景潜力。结果表明:这份风险管理准则非常强调分配和程序正义的社会和空间问题,而对于互动性、矫正性正义以及时间、生态问题的考虑则较少,由此,可能会导致突发性事件风险传播对社会可持续发展产生不利影响。

关键词: 社会正义, 风险传播, 可持续发展, 耦合机制, 突发性事件

Abstract:

In order to identify the different dimensions of social justice in the risk communication of public crisis events for the promotion of sustainable social development, the theoretical mechanism between the four dimensions of social justice: procedural, interactive, distributive, and corrective justice and sustainable social, ecological, spatial, and temporal characteristics were explained by constructing a theoretical framework of risk justice. Then, we defined risk justice as the fair and reasonable quality of stakeholders' right to participate in the governance and management of public crisis events. To validate the constructed risk justice frameworks, we conducted a detailed content analysis of the risk management guideline, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, which was used to elucidate the prospective potential of the risk justice framework. The results suggest that this risk management guideline emphasizes the social and spatial issues of distributive and procedural justice, and less consideration in interactivity, corrective justice, and temporal and ecological issues, which may lead to the negative impacts of public crisis events risk communication on the sustainable development of society.

Key words: risk communication, sustainable development, social justice, coupling mechanisms, public crisis events

中图分类号:

X915.2安全社会学

徐新龙, 陈妤婕, 刘舜佳. 基于社会正义的风险传播与可持续发展耦合机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(9): 27-33.

XU Xinlong, CHEN Yujie, LIU Shunjia. Coupling mechanisms of risk communication and sustainable development based on social justice[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(9): 27-33.

图/表 6

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 18

[1]	单而芳. 河流洪水风险控制的合作博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 45-51.
	SHAN Erfang. The cooperative game approach for river flooding risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 45-51.
[2]	PEARSON L, PELLING M. The UN Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030: negotiation process and prospects for science and practice[J]. Journal of Extreme Events, 2015, 2(1): 1-12.
[3]	MG DE HERVE. Fair strategies to tackle unfair risks? Justice considerations within flood risk management[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 69: DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102745.
[4]	SAREWITZ D, PIELKE R, KEYKHAH M. Vulnerability and risk: some thoughts from a political and policy perspective[J]. Risk Analysis, 2003, 23(4): 805-810. pmid: 12926572
[5]	BUETTNER-SCHMIDT K, LOBO M L. Social justice: a concept analysis[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2012, 68(4): 948-958.
[6]	马宁, 刘怡君. 重大突发事件舆情风险点预测研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(11): 58-66.
	MA Ning, LIU Yijun. Research on the risk points prediction of emergency public opinion[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(11): 58-66.
[7]	陈芳, 崔庆敏, 向千秋. 基于动态贝叶斯网络的民航空中停车事件安全风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(7): 16-23. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.1884
	CHEN Fang, CUI Qingmin, XIANG Qianqiu. Safety risk assessment of civil aviation air parking events based on DBN[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(7): 16-23. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.07.1884
[8]	SAM A S, ABBAS A, PADMAJA S S, et al. Flood vulnerability and food security in eastern India: a threat to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 66: DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102589.
[9]	BYRON K, THATCHER S M B. Editors' comments: "what I know now that I wish I knew then":teaching theory and theory building[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2016, 41(1): 1-8.
[10]	JOHNSON B B, SWEDLOW B. Cultural theory's contributions to risk analysis: a thematic review with directions and resources for further research[J]. Risk Analysis, 2021, 41(3): 429-455.
[11]	WEINRIB E J. Corrective justice in a nutshell[J]. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 2002, 52(4): 349-356.
[12]	王泽琳, 金德禄, 张如良. 中美环境正义问题及实践差异的比较研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(8): 140-147.
	WANG Zelin, JIN Delu, ZHANG Ruliang. A comparative study on the issues and practice of environmental justice in China and the United States of America[J]. China Population Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(8): 140-147.
[13]	BEGG C. Power, responsibility and justice: a review of local stakeholder participation in European flood risk management[J]. Local Environment, 2018, 23(4): 383-397.
[14]	AVEN T. Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 253(1): 1-13.
[15]	谭爽, 韩菲, 武佳奇. 撬动对话与秩序生产:草根NGO何以提升环境风险沟通效能:以“垃圾焚烧风险沟通”为视窗[J]. 公共管理学报, 2023, 20(3): 76-89,170.
	TAN Shuang, HAN Fei, WU Jiaqi. Pivoting dialogue and order production: how Chinese grassroots NGOs improve the effectiveness of environmental risk communication:take "waste incineration risk communication" as an example[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2023, 20(3): 76-89,170.
[16]	GREENBERG J. Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow[J]. Journal of Management, 1990, 16(2): 399-432.
[17]	李海辰, 冯文文, 张少恺, 等. 城市洪涝灾害防御中的前沿信息技术应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(9): 137-143. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2707
	LI Haichen, FENG Wenwen, ZHANG Shaokai, et al. Review on application of cutting-edge information technology in urban flood prevention system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(9): 137-143. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.09.2707
[18]	杨建国. 从知识遮蔽到认知民主:环境风险治理的知识生产[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(10): 1735-1742.
	YANG Jianguo. From knowledge masking to cognitive democracy: knowledge production of environmental risk management[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(10): 1735-1742.

风险正义维度	现有研究的正义框架
社会	社会正义代内正义环境正义
生态	生态正义多物种公正
空间	空间正义气候正义环境正义国际正义
时间	?代际正义

基于社会正义的风险传播与可持续发展耦合机制

Coupling mechanisms of risk communication and sustainable development based on social justice

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	乔卫亮, 邓婉怡, 马晓雪, 韩冰. 复杂网络下船舶碰撞风险传播演化分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(5): 101-110.
[2]	陈勇刚, 熊升华, 贺强, 詹婷雯. 民航机务维修不安全事件N-K风险耦合分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 104-109.
[3]	江新，赵静. 工程项目群的AHP-NET风险评价模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(10): 158-.
[4]	周志华，叶洲元. 关于湖南电力安全稳定供应的对策研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(6): 72-.
[5]	温国明，李翔，马红霞，刘秀玲. 洛阳市饮用水源地水质安全研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(3): 15-.
[6]	李智国，杨子生. 中国土地生态安全研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(12): 5-.
[7]	李翔，舒俭民，江梅. 技术资源对生态足迹需求的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2006, 16(9): 10-.
[8]	李翔，许兆义，元炯亮. 现代铝业生态环境系统研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(4): 11-.
[9]	梁韬，陈国华，张辉，陈清光. 区域战略安全管理--历史、现状与未来[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(2): 19-.
[10]	李翔，许兆义，孟伟. 城市生态承载力研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(2): 3-.
[11]	周志华，罗一新，刘勤. 关于我国能源安全稳定供应的思考[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(11): 56-.
[12]	吴宗之. 安全生产是中国可持续发展的重要组成部分[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(9): 3-.
[13]	徐志胜，冯凯，白国强，王薇，徐彧. 关于城市公共安全可持续发展理论的初步研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(1): 1-.
[14]	韩英，唐永忠，刘永军. 营造可持续发展的生态安全建筑[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2003, 13(12): 36-.
[15]	隋鹏程. 安全科学与社会可持续发展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2000, 10(2): 7-.