机场飞行区CPS网络建模及韧性评估

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2025.02.0623

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为评估机场飞行区信息物理系统(CPS)的韧性,并为紧急情况下的快速恢复提供参考,以飞行区管制网为信息网,飞行区滑行路径网为物理网,构建精细化、实时化的机场飞行区CPS网络模型;以西安咸阳机场飞行区CPS为例,针对机场飞行区CPS网络,选取最大连通子图相对值计算网络的连通性,并结合鲁棒性、性能损失和综合韧性指标评估网络韧性;对比不同扰动-恢复策略下的机场飞行区CPS情况,以确定出最佳恢复策略。结果表明:介数扰动对管制网破坏最大,度值扰动对滑行路径网破坏最大;采用介数恢复能够使机场飞行区CPS韧性得到较快恢复;在随机扰动下,机场飞行区CPS网络展现出较高的韧性水平。

关键词: 机场飞行区, 信息物理系统(CPS), 管制网, 网络模型, 韧性评估, 介数扰动, 度值扰动, 最大连通子图相对值

Abstract:

In order to assess the resilience of CPS in airport flight areas and provide a reference for rapid recovery in emergencies, a refined and real-time airport flight area CPS network model with flight area control network as the information network and flight area taxi path network as the physical network was proposed. For CPS network in airfield areas, the connectivity of the network was calculated by selecting the relative values of the largest connected subgraphs. The network's resilience was evaluated by combining robustness, performance loss, and comprehensive resilience indicators. CPS situation in airfield areas under different disturbance recovery strategies was compared to determine the optimal recovery strategy. Taking Xi'an Xianyang Airport flight area CPS as an example, the results show that betweenness perturbation causes the greatest damage to the control network, while degree value perturbation causes the greatest damage to the taxiing path network. Using betweenness recovery can enable faster recovery of CPS resilience in airfield areas, and CPS network of the flight area of the airport shows a higher level of resilience under random perturbation. The research results can simulate and predict relevant nodes and provide certain reference significance for ensuring the safety of flight area operations.

Key words: airport flight zones, cyber-physical system (CPS), control network, network model, resilience assessment, betweeness perturbation, degree value perturbation, maximum connectivity subgraph relative values

中图分类号:

X949

王兴隆, 邱鑫, 魏奕雯. 机场飞行区CPS网络建模及韧性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(2): 49-56.

WANG Xinglong, QIU Xin, Wei Yiwen. Modeling and resilience assessment of CPS network in airfield area[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(2): 49-56.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 16

[1]	田洁, 周沅. 基于跑道侵入场景仿真的危险分析方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(6):111-116.
	TIAN Jie, ZHOU Yuan. Hazards analysis method based on scenario simulation of runway incursion[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(6):111-116.
[2]	BOLIC T, SIVCEV Z. Eruption of Eyjafjallajökull in Iceland: experience of European air traffic management[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2011: DOI: 10.3141/2214-17.
[3]	方红奕. 浅谈机场助航灯光系统故障分析及对策[J]. 工程建设与设计, 2019, 67(6):62-63.
	FANG Hongyi. Discussion on fault analysis and countermeasure of airport aid lighting system[J]. Construction & Design for Engineering, 2019, 67(6):62-63.
[4]	GRIFFOR E, GREER C, WOLLMAN D, et al. Framework for cyber-physical systems[M]. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2017:1-38.
[5]	ZHANG Lichen. Convergence approach to model physical world and cyber world of aviation cyber physical system[C]. 2014 IEEE 12^th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 2014:418-423.
[6]	KRISHNA S, RADHA P. Aviation cyber-physical systems: foundations for future aircraft and air transport[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2013:1834-1855.
[7]	王海军, 赵海涛, 任保全, 等. 一种面向无人机智能通信的信息物理融合框架[J]. 中国科学:信息科学, 2022, 52(11):2141-2154.
	WANG Haijun, ZHAO Haitao, REN Baoquan, et al. Cyber-physical framework for UAV intelligent communications[J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2022, 52(11): 2141-2154.
[8]	FRANK S, JASON R, SAI V, et al. Information flow diagram analysis of a model cyber-physical system: conflict detection and resolution for airport surface traffic[J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 2013, 28(12):26-35.
[9]	王兴隆, 苗尚飞, 贺敏, 等. 基于改进K-shell算法的空中交通信息物理系统节点排序[J]. 中国科技论文, 2020, 15(10):1144-1149.
	WANG Xinglong, MIAO Shangfei, HE Min, et al. Node ranking of air traffic information physical system based on improved K-shell algorithm[J]. China Science Paper, 2020, 15(10):1144-1149.
[10]	HOLLING C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1973, 4(4):1-23.
[11]	IP W H, WANG Dingwei. Resilience and friability of transportation networks: evaluation, analysis and optimization[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2011, 5(2):189-198.
[12]	张雯婕, 胡军红, 闻成维, 等. 考虑网络韧性的城市轨道交通故障恢复研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4):179-186. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1770
	ZHANG Wenjie, HU Junhong, WEN Chengwei, et al. Research on urban rail failure recovery considering network resilience[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(4):179-186. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.04.1770
[13]	吕彪, 高自强, 刘一骝. 道路交通系统韧性及路段重要度评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2):114-121.
	LYU Biao, GAO Ziqiang, LIU Yiliu. Evaluation of road transportation system resilience and link importance[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(2):114-121.
[14]	马敏, 胡大伟, 舒兰, 等. 城市轨道交通网络韧性评估及恢复策略[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2023, 53(2):396-404.
	MA Min, HU Dawei, SHU Lan, et al. Resilience assessment and recovery strategy on urban rail transit network[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 2023, 53(2):396-404.
[15]	王兴隆, 赵俊妮, 贺敏. 基于贝叶斯网络的空中交通运输系统韧性评价[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 54(6):1121-1130.
	WANG Xinglong, ZHAO Junni, HE Min. Resilience evaluation on air transportation system based on bayesian network[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2022, 54(6):1121-1130.
[16]	王兴隆, 石宗北, 陈仔燕. 空中交通网络模体识别及子图结构韧性评估[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7):558-568.
	WANG Xinglong, SHI Zongbei, CHEN Ziyan. Air traffic network motif recognition and sub graph structure resilience evaluation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(7):558-568.