中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 221-226.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.01.0427

• 职业卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

夏季穿着医用防护服人员热应激模拟

郑国忠(), 戴维   

  1. 华北电力大学 能源动力与机械工程学院,河北 保定 071003
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-22 修回日期:2022-11-16 出版日期:2023-01-28 发布日期:2023-07-28
  • 作者简介:

    郑国忠 (1982—),男,福建泉州人,博士,副教授,主要从事高温环境劳动保护、建筑环境等方面的研究。E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(20YJAZH138)

Simulation of heat stress of people wearing medical protective clothing in summer

ZHENG Guozhong(), DAI Wei   

  1. School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding Hebei 071003, China
  • Received:2022-08-22 Revised:2022-11-16 Online:2023-01-28 Published:2023-07-28

摘要:

为降低夏季医护人员长时间穿着医用防护服带来的健康风险,选取标准中国男性人体作为研究对象,利用预测热应变(PHS)模型、热应变决策辅助(HSDA)系统和Fiala体温调节模型 3种经典人体热应变模型,模拟人体穿着医用防护服时在夏季不同环境工况下的核心温度和出汗率,进而确定不同环境工况下的推荐补水量和安全工作时间。结果表明:环境参数对生理应激影响显著,不同环境下核心温度最大差值为11.17 ℃,出汗率最大差值为6 592 g/h;环境温度每增大1 ℃,相对湿度每升高1%,安全时间平均缩短5.9和0.89 min;环境温度36和40℃时,安全时间仅为88~124和75~100 min;3种模型在低温低湿时预测结果相对接近,在高温高湿时预测结果存在明显差距,核心温度预测差值最大为7.55 ℃,平均出汗率预测差值最大为5 654.35 g/h。

关键词: 夏季, 医用防护服, 热应激, 医护人员, 核心温度, 出汗率, 预测热应变(PHS), 热应变决策辅助(HSDA)

Abstract:

To reduce the health risks of wearing medical protective clothing for a long time in summer, the standard Chinese human body model was selected, three classical heat strain models (PHS model, HSDA model and Fiala body temperature regulation model) were used, and the core temperatures and sweat rates of the medical staff wearing medical protective clothing in various environments in summer were simulated. The recommended water intake rate and safe time for the medical staff in various environments in summer were determined. The results indicate that the physiological responses of human body are significantly affected by environmental parameters. In different environments, the maximum difference of core temperature and sweat rate is 11.17 ℃ and 6 592 g/h, respectively. When the ambient temperature increases by 1 ℃ or the ambient relative humidity increases by 1%, the average safety time decreases by 5.9 and 0.89 min, respectively. When the ambient temperatures is 36 and 40 ℃, the safety time is only 88-124 and 75-100 min, respectively. In the low temperature and low humidity conditions, the prediction results of the three models are relatively close. However, in the high temperature and high humidity conditions, the prediction results of the three models are significant different, and the maximum difference of the core temperature and sweat rate is 7.55 ℃ and 5 654.35 g/h, respectively.

Key words: summer, medical protective clothing, heat stress, medical staff, core temperature, sweat rate, predicted heat strain (PHS), heat strain decision aid (HSDA)