煤矿掘进工作面粉尘延时采样测量方法

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.10.2042

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 199-206.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2023.10.2042

煤矿掘进工作面粉尘延时采样测量方法

林汉毅¹^,²(), 江丙友¹^,², 袁亮¹^,², 任波³^,⁴, 王小涵¹^,²

¹ 安徽理工大学工业粉尘防控与职业安全健康教育部重点实验室,安徽淮南 232001
² 安徽理工大学安全科学与工程学院,安徽淮南 232001
³ 煤炭开采国家工程技术研究院,安徽淮南 232001
⁴ 中国矿业大学(北京) 应急管理与安全工程学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2023-04-20 修回日期:2023-07-22 出版日期:2023-11-24
作者简介:
林汉毅 (1998—),男,海南万宁人,博士研究生,研究方向为工业粉尘防控技术及理论。E-mail:hnlinhanyi@163.com。
江丙友教授
袁亮教授
任波教授级高级工程师
基金资助:
安徽省高校协同创新项目(GXXT-2020-059); 国家自然科学基金资助(51874009); 国家自然科学基金资助(52074012)

Measurement method of dust time-delay sampling in coal mine heading face

LIN Hanyi¹^,²(), JIANG Bingyou¹^,², YUAN Liang¹^,², REN Bo³^,⁴, WANG Xiaohan¹^,²

¹ Key Laboratory of Industrial Dust Prevention and Control & Occupational Safety and Health,Ministry of Education, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
² School of Safety Science and Engineering,Anhui University of Science & Technology, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
³ Coal Mining National Engineering Technology Research Institute, Huainan Anhui 232001, China
⁴ School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2023-04-20 Revised:2023-07-22 Published:2023-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究煤矿掘进工作面采样时刻对滤膜称重法测量长距离巷道粉尘运移情况的影响,结合有限元分析方法提出延时采样法。首先分析粉尘颗粒沿巷道径向的运动模型,然后估算粉尘在巷道中运移所需的时间,制定粉尘质量浓度测量方案,并在煤矿巷道实地测量。结果表明:延时采样法得到不同时间、不同位置和不同作业工况下相同批次粉尘的运移分布情况,而多点同步采样法的不同起始时间的测试结果稳定性差;分析延时采样法的数据发现“尘汇现象”,其导致弱风巷道粉尘质量浓度的每小时增长速率约为扩散至该区域粉尘质量浓度的10%~15%。分析延时采样法在不同工况下的粉尘质量浓度及其对应的尘汇浓度和测量误差,发现新的非截割尘源位置,并计算产尘浓度,为针对性布置和安装巷道降尘设备提供参考依据。

关键词: 掘进工作面, 延时采样法, 起始采样时间, 粉尘质量浓度, 尘汇现象

Abstract:

In order to study the influence of different sampling time nodes on the dust transport in the long-distance alleyway measured by the filter membrane weighing method, a time-delayed sampling method was proposed in combination with the finite element analysis method. The force of dust particles in the flow field was analyzed, and the radial motion model along the roadway was obtained. According to the wind speed distribution of the roadway, the time required for dust to move in the roadway was estimated, a dust concentration measurement plan was formulated and measured in the coal mine roadway was analyzed. The results show that the migration and distribution of the same batch of dust at different times, different locations and different working conditions can be obtained by the time-delay sampling method, while the test results of the multi-point synchronous sampling method at different starting times are unstable. Dust accumulation was found in the data analysis of the time-delay sampling method, which resulted in an hourly growth rate of dust concentration in the weak wind tunnel equal to about 10%-15% of the dust concentration diffused into the area. The dust concentrations and their corresponding dust accumulation concentrations and measurement errors of the time-delayed sampling method under different working conditions are analyzed, new dust source locations are identified, and dust-producing concentrations are calculated to provide a reference basis for the targeted arrangement and installation of dust reduction equipment in the roadway.

Key words: heading face, time-delay sampling method, sampling start time, dust mass concentration, dust accumulation

林汉毅, 江丙友, 袁亮, 任波, 王小涵. 煤矿掘进工作面粉尘延时采样测量方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(10): 199-206.

LIN Hanyi, JIANG Bingyou, YUAN Liang, REN Bo, WANG Xiaohan. Measurement method of dust time-delay sampling in coal mine heading face[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33(10): 199-206.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

表2

参考文献 19

[1]	袁亮. 煤矿粉尘防控与职业安全健康科学构想[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(1):1-7.
	YUAN Liang. Scientific conception of coal mine dust control and occupational safety[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(1):1-7.
[2]	陈刚, 张晓蕾, 徐帅, 等. 我国2005—2020年粉尘爆炸事故统计分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(8):76-83. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.0812
	CHEN Gang, ZHANG Xiaolei, XU Shuai, et al. Statistical analysis on dust explosion accidents in China from 2005 to 2020[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(8):76-83. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.08.0812
[3]	樊晶光, 张建芳, 王海椒, 等. 我国煤矿尘肺病防治现状,问题与对策建议[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2021, 39(1):1-5.
	FAN Jingguang, ZHANG Jianfang, WANG Haijiao, et al. Present situation and problem of pneumoconiosis prevention and control in coal mines and proposed countermeasures in China[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2021, 39(1):1-5.
[4]	国家卫生健康委员会规划发展与信息化司. 2021年我国卫生健康事业发展统计公报[Z]. 2022-07-05.
[5]	张丹丹, 刘贝贝. 我国矿山职业病的统计与展望分析[J]. 能源与环保, 2017, 39(9) :173-178.
	ZHANG Dandan, LIU Beibei. Statistics and prospect of occupational diseases of mine in China[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2017, 39(9):173-178.
[6]	国家卫生健康委, 中共中央宣传部, 国家发展和改革委员会, 等. 关于印发国家职业病防治规划(2021—2025年)的通知[Z].2021-12-18.
[7]	王杰, 郑林江. 煤矿粉尘职业危害监测技术及其发展趋势[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(11):119-125.
	WANG Jie, ZHENG Linjiang. Development tendency and monitoring technology of dust occupational hazard in coal mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2017, 45(11):119-125.
[8]	付士根, 李全明, 胡家国, 等. 光散射原理在粉尘测量系统的应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6):37-42. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.006
	FU Shigen, LI Quanming, HU Jiaguo, et al. Application research of light scattering principle in dust measurement system[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(6):37-42. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2020.06.006
[9]	ZHANG Songsong, DU Qian, QI Guoli. Experimental study on production and emission characteristics of PM_2.5 from industrial fluidized bed boilers[J]. Thermal Science, 2020, 24(5A): 2665-2675. doi: 10.2298/TSCI190828001Z
[10]	ZHAO Zheng, LI Dewen, LIU Guoqing, et al. An improved dust-concentration measurement algorithm based on multifeature fusion of β-Ray intensity fluctuations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 69(9):6420-6428. doi: 10.1109/TIM.19
[11]	朱修军, 杨文, 耿春梅, 等. 空气颗粒物采样滤膜截留效率研究[J]. 南开大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 51(1):106-111.
	ZHU Xiujun, YANG Wen, GENG Chunmei, et al. Study on the collection efficiency of air particulate matter sampling filters[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis, 2018, 51(1):106-111.
[12]	李星, 赵文吉, 熊秋林, 等. 北京采暖季PM_2.5水溶性无机离子污染特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018 27(1):93-100. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.01.013
	LI Xing, ZHAO Wenji, XIONG Qiulin, et al. The pollution characteristics and influencing factors of PM_2.5 inorganic water-soluble ions in Beijing during heating season[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018 27(1):93-100.
[13]	赵静琦, 姬亚芹, 张蕾, 等. 基于样方法的天津市春季道路扬尘P M 2 . 5中水溶性离子特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(5):1994-1999.
	ZHAO Jingqi, JI Yaqin, ZHANG Lei, et al. Characteristics and source apportionment of water-soluble inorganic ions in road Dust PM_2.5 during spring in Tianjin using the quadrat sampling method[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(5):1994-1999.
[14]	田程远, 严明, 张云, 等. 杭州市中心城区大气PM_2.5暴露致大鼠肺部损伤作用研究[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2018, 34(4):299-303,317. pmid: 30788935
	TIAN Chengyuan, YAN Ming, ZHANG Yun, et al. Effect of particulate matter 2.5 at urban centre of Hangzhou on lung impairment in rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Physiology, 2018, 34(4):299-303,317. doi: 10.12047/j.cjap.5651.2018.069 pmid: 30788935
[15]	刘中兴, 周一凡, 伍永福, 等. 3kA钕电解槽流场中颗粒受力分析[J]. 中国稀土学报, 2020, 38(1): 90-99.
	LIU Zhongxing, ZHOU Yifan, WU Yongfu, et al. Force analysis of particle in flow field of 3 kA rare earth electrolysis cell[J]. Journal of the Chinese Society of Rare Earths, 2020, 38(1): 90-99.
[16]	SHI Guoqing, LIU Maoxi, GUO Zhixiong, et al. Unsteady simulation for optimal arrangement of dedusting airduct in coal mine heading face(Article)[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 46: 45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.01.011
[17]	应急管理部. 煤矿安全规程2022年版[L].2022-04-01.
[18]	张国枢. 通风安全学[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2011:38-39.
[19]	MT/T 1189—2020,综掘工作面综合防尘技术规范[S].
	MT/T 1189-2020, Technical specifications of comprehensive dust control measures forfully mechanized excavation face[S].

序号	时间点	序号	时间点	序号	时间点
1	0	6	167	11	1 689
2	11	7	298	12	2 247
3	26	8	494	13	2 818
4	46	9	764	14	3 585
5	92	10	1 156	15	4 350

采样点	粉尘质量浓度/(mg·m^-3)
	测试组1 (掘进后30 s)		测试组2 (掘进后2 400 s)		测试组3 (掘进后4 800 s)
		全尘	呼尘	全尘	呼尘	全尘	呼尘
1	271.8	104.5	-0.9	+1.8	-4.4	+2.2
2	238.6	95.4	+5.1	+0.9	+1.9	-2.2
3	245.4	99.2	+4.1	+2.3	-0.8	+3.5
4	143.7	67.5	+1.1	+1.9	+2.6	+3.3
5	125.5	63.3	+4.6	+3.5	+11.0	+6.0
6	109.2	55.4	+9.2	+4.3	+16.0	+10.2
7	96.4	52.7	+8.8	+5.7	+16.4	+12.1
8	92.7	54.5	+14.2	+3.7	+22.5	+11.1
9	93.8	53	+12.6	+6.8	+19.0	+11.2
10	89.4	53.8	+10.9	+4.1	+19.3	+9.5
11	86.9	52.4	+10.6	+4.7	+15.4	+5.3
12	87.2	53.1	+11.9	+5.2	+14.4	+3.1
13	87.6	52	+10.6	+5.7	+13.1	+5.1
14	89.2	52.9	+9.5	+4.4	+14.2	+3.5
15	108.4	61.5	-15.5	-9.1	-9.0	-4.8

煤矿掘进工作面粉尘延时采样测量方法

Measurement method of dust time-delay sampling in coal mine heading face

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 19

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李沛琳, 蒋仲安, 曾发镔. 制曲车间多尘源粉尘分布特征数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(4): 130-139.
[2]	付士根, 李全明, 胡家国, 董贺伟. 光散射原理在粉尘测量系统的应用研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 37-42.
[3]	李忠辉, 马云波, 郑安琪, 何顺, 王枫植, 张昕. 掘进工作面突出危险性预测及危险区可视化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 53-59.
[4]	范健强, 白建平, 赵一姝, 袁玮成, 王越, 李向富. 硫磺粉尘爆炸特性影响因素试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 81-86.
[5]	鲁忠良，樊小利，肖亚宁. 内抽外压式集尘器实验、数值模拟与分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(10): 99-.
[6]	魏国营，张书军，辛新平. 突出煤层掘进防突技术研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(6): 100-.
[7]	吴强，秦跃平，郭亮，吴青银. 掘进工作面围岩散热的有限元计算[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2002, 12(6): 33-.