碳酸氢盐抑制乙烯/聚乙烯两相爆炸特性研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.08.1669

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 138-146.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2024.08.1669

碳酸氢盐抑制乙烯/聚乙烯两相爆炸特性研究

纪文涛¹^,²^,³(), 徐子晖¹^,²^,³, 毛文哲¹^,²^,³, 杨帅帅¹^,²^,³, 张国涛¹^,²^,³, 王燕¹^,²^,³^,^**()

¹ 河南理工大学安全科学与工程学院,河南焦作 454003
² 河南省燃爆动力灾害预警与应急工程技术研究中心,河南焦作 454003
³ 煤炭安全生产与清洁利用省部共建协同创新中心,河南焦作 454003

收稿日期:2024-02-20 修回日期:2024-05-12 出版日期:2024-08-28
通信作者:
** 王燕(1982—),女,河南周口人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事气体与粉尘爆炸防治、危化品安全等方面的研究。E-mail:yanwang@hpu.edu.cn。

作者简介:

纪文涛 (1989—),男,河南周口人,博士,副教授,河南理工大学安全学院化工安全研究所所长,主要从事气体与粉尘爆炸灾害防治方面的研究。E-mail: jiwentao@hpu.edu.cn。

基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52374197); 国家重点研发计划(2022YFC3080700); 河南省优秀青年科学基金(212300410042)

Investigation on inhibition characteristics of bicarbonate on hybrid explosion of ethylene/polyethylene mixture

JI Wentao¹^,²^,³(), XU Zihui¹^,²^,³, MAO Wenzhe¹^,²^,³, YANG Shuaishuai¹^,²^,³, ZHANG Guotao¹^,²^,³, WANG Yan¹^,²^,³^,^**()

¹ College of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China
² Explosion Dynamic Disaster Early Warning and Emergency Engineering Technology Research Center of Henan Province, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China
³ Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Work Safety and Clean High Efficiency Utilization, Jiaozuo Henan 454003, China

Received:2024-02-20 Revised:2024-05-12 Published:2024-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为防治乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系爆炸危害,选取碳酸氢盐作为抑爆粉体,在20 L球型爆炸装置内开展抑爆试验,探究不同碳酸氢盐对乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系的爆炸抑制效果及机制,并讨论不同碳酸氢盐对两相体系爆炸抑制性能之间的差异性。结果表明:两相体系较单相聚乙烯更难抑制,且随着乙烯体积分数的增加,两相体系爆炸抑制难度增大;碳酸氢盐对不同质量浓度的乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系均具有抑制作用,其抑制效率受乙烯体积分数和碳酸氢盐质量浓度的综合影响;碳酸氢盐均能在聚乙烯爆炸过程中通过物化反应抑制乙烯/聚乙烯两相爆炸,碳酸氢钾的分解吸热性能及其对聚乙烯热解的延缓作用均优于碳酸氢钠,故碳酸氢钾对乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系爆炸的抑制效果优于碳酸氢钠。

关键词: 碳酸氢盐, 乙烯, 聚乙烯, 两相体系, 抑爆特性

Abstract:

In order to prevent and control the explosion hazards of ethylene/polyethylene hybrid mixture, bicarbonate was selected as the explosion suppression powder, and the explosion suppression experiment was carried out in a 20 L spherical explosion device to explore the explosion inhibition effect and mechanism of different bicarbonate on ethylene/polyethylene hybrid mixture. The differences of explosion inhibition performance of different bicarbonate on the hybrid mixture were discussed. The results show that the hybrid mixture is more difficult to inhibit than the single-phase polyethylene. With the increase of ethylene concentration, the explosion inhibition of the hybrid mixture becomes more difficult. The bicarbonate has an inhibitory effect on the ethylene/polyethylene hybrid mixture with different concentrations, and the inhibition efficiency is affected by the concentration of ethylene and bicarbonate. Bicarbonate can inhibit the ethylene/polyethylene hybrid explosion through physicochemical reaction during the polyethylene explosion. The decomposition and endothermic properties of potassium bicarbonate and its retardation effect on polyethylene pyrolysis are better than those of sodium bicarbonate, so the inhibition effect of potassium bicarbonate on the explosion of ethylene/polyethylene hybrid mixture is better than that of sodium bicarbonate.

Key words: bicarbonate, ethylene, polyethylene, hybrid system, explosion suppression characteristic

中图分类号:

X937

纪文涛, 徐子晖, 毛文哲, 杨帅帅, 张国涛, 王燕. 碳酸氢盐抑制乙烯/聚乙烯两相爆炸特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(8): 138-146.

JI Wentao, XU Zihui, MAO Wenzhe, YANG Shuaishuai, ZHANG Guotao, WANG Yan. Investigation on inhibition characteristics of bicarbonate on hybrid explosion of ethylene/polyethylene mixture[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(8): 138-146.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 28

[1]	GAN Bo, LI Bing, JIANG Haipeng, et al. Ethylene/polyethylene hybrid explosions: part 1 effects of ethylene concentrations on flame propagations[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 54: 93-102.
[2]	MITTAL M, GUHA B K. Minimum ignition temperature of polyethylene dust: a theoretical model[J]. Fire and Materials, 1997, 21: 169-177.
[3]	LIN Chendi, QI Yingquan, GAN Xiangyang, et al. Investigation into the suppression effects of inert powders on the minimum ignition temperature and the mini-mum ignition energy of polyethylene dust[J]. Processes, 2020, 8(3): DOI: 10.3390/pr8030294.
[4]	马冉, 高建村, 杨凯, 等. 聚乙烯粉尘爆炸研究进展[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2017, 23(6):59-63.
	MA Ran, GAO Jiancun, YANG Kai, et al. Research progress on polyethylene dust explosion[J]. Chinese Powder Technology, 2017, 23(6): 59-63.
[5]	PENG Lei, CAO JiaoJiao, ZHAO Yu, et al. Minimum ignition energy of LDPE dust/ethylene hybrid mixture[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2021, 72: DOI: 10.1016/J.JLP.2021.104546.
[6]	PENG Lei, CAO Jiaojiao, MA Ruirui, et al. Risk assessment method of polyethylene dust explosion based on explosion parameters[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2021, 69: DOI: 10.1016/J.JLP.2021.104397.
[7]	关世钧. 浅析辽化“2·23”爆震事故的成因及预防[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2002, 21(5):83-85.
	GUAN Shijun. Analysis of the causes and prevention of "2·23" knock accident in Liao hua[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2002, 21(5): 83-85.
[8]	SONG Lin, LIU Zhengtang, QIAN Jifa, et al. Inertant effects and mechanism of Al(OH)₃ powder on polyethylene dust explosions based on flame propagation behavior and thermal analysis[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2021, 124: DOI: 10.1016/J.FIRESAF.2021.103392.
[9]	WANG Yang, YANG Jingjing, HE Jia, et al. Inhibition effect of KHCO₃ and KH₂PO₄ on ethylene explosion[J]. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(8): 7 566-7 574.
[10]	王燕, 李忠, 张一民, 等. 不同磷酸氢盐作用下的乙烯抑爆特性及机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5):48-54. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.05.1564
	WANG Yan, LI Zhong, ZHANG Yimin, et al. The explosion suppression characteristics and mechanisms of ethylene under different effects of hydrogen phosphate salts[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32(5): 48-54. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2022.05.1564
[11]	王燕, 杨帅帅, 张国涛, 等. 改性沸石抑制乙烯爆炸性能及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(12):5 048-5 060.
	WANG Yan, YANG Shuaishuai, ZHANG Guotao, et al. Research on the inhibition performance and mechanism of ethylene explosion by modified zeolite[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2023, 74(12): 5 048-5 060.
[12]	JIANG Bingyou, DING Dawei, SU Mingqing, et al. Experimental study on the explosion suppression characteristics of polyethylene dust by ammonium polyphosphate[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 437: DOI: 10.1016/J.POWTEC.2024.119491.
[13]	ZHANG Yansong, PAN Zhichao, YANG Junjie, et al. Study on the suppression mechanism of (NH₄)₂CO₃ and SiC for polyethylene deflagration based on flame propagation and experimental analysis[J]. Powder Technology, 2022, 399: DOI: 10.1016/J.POWTEC.2022.117193.
[14]	WANG Yan, LIN Chendi, QI Yingquan, et al. Suppression of polyethylene dust explosion by sodium bicarbonate[J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 367: 206-212.
[15]	ADDAI E K, GABELl D, KRAUSE U. Lower explosion limit of hybrid mixtures of burnable gas and dust[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 36: 499-506.
[16]	SONG Shixiang, CHENG Yanggan, MENG Xiangrui, et al. Hybrid CH₄/coal dust explosions in a 20-L spherical vessel[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 122: 281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.12.023
[17]	喻健良, 纪文涛, 孙会利, 等. 乙烯/聚乙烯两相体系爆炸特性[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12):4 841-4 847.
	YU Jianliang, JI Wentao, SUN Huili, et al. Explosion characteristics of ethylene/polyethylene mixed system[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4 841-4 847.
[18]	JI Wentao, YAN Xinqing, SUN Huili, et al. Comparative analysis of the explosibility of several different hybrid mixtures[J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 325: 42-48.
[19]	ZHOU Jianhua, JIANG Haipeng, ZHOU Yonghao, et al. Flame suppression of 100 nm PMMA dust explosion by KHCO₃ with different particle size[J]. Process Safety and Environment Protection, 2019, 132: 303-312.
[20]	GB/T 16426—1996, 粉尘云最大爆炸压力和最大压力上升速率测定方法[S].
	GB/T 16426-1996, Method for determining the maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise rate of dust clouds[S].
[21]	EN 14034-3-2011, Determination of the explosive properties of the dust clouds. part 3: determination of low explosion limit LEL; German version EN 14034-3-2006+A1-2011[S].
[22]	RUDOLF K, MICHAL K, MARIAN G. Suppression of dust explosions by means of an active superfast explosion-suppression system of five liter volume[J]. International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion, 2010, 9(1): DOI: 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.v9.i1.10.
[23]	JIANG Haipeng, BI Mingshu, LI Bei, et al. Flame inhibition of aluminum dust explosion by NaHCO₃ and NH₄H₂PO₄, Combust[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 200: 97-114. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.11.016
[24]	WILLIAMS A, FLEMING J W. Suppression mechanisms of alkali metal compounds[C]. Halon Options Technical Working Conference, 1999: 157-169.
[25]	罗振敏, 康凯. CO₂抑制甲烷-空气链式爆炸微观机制的仿真分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(5):42-48.
	LUO Zhenmin, KANG Kai. Simulation analysis of microscopic mechanism of CO₂ inhibition of methane-air chain explosion[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(5): 42-48.
[26]	WANG Yan, CHENG Yishen, YU Minggao, et al. Methane explosion suppression characteristics based on the NaHCO₃/red-mud composite powders with core-shell structure[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 335: 84-91.
[27]	路长, 刘洋, 王鸿波, 等. CO₂、H₂对CH₄/Air预混气爆炸特性的影响[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(5):1 788-1 795.
	LU Chang, LIU Yang, WANG Hongbo, et al. Experimental study of the effects of CO₂/H₂ on the characteristic features of methane/air bursts[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2018, 18(5): 1 788-1 795.
[28]	LI Rui, HE Guoqiang, QIN Fei, et al. Skeletal chemical kinetic model generation and analysis for combustion of ethylene[J]. Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(9): 2 074-2 083.

介质	名称	乙烯体积分数/ %	聚乙烯质量浓度/ (g·m^-3)	爆炸压力/ MPa	爆炸压力上升速率/ (MPa·s^-1)
聚乙烯	A	0	400	0.63	59.01
两相	B	2	200	0.71	64.25
	C	4	100	0.76	72.40
	D	6	50	0.79	76.12
乙烯	E	8	0	0.82	80.91

碳酸氢盐抑制乙烯/聚乙烯两相爆炸特性研究

Investigation on inhibition characteristics of bicarbonate on hybrid explosion of ethylene/polyethylene mixture

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	丁清泉, 袁必和, 陈先锋, 黄楚原, 贺云龙, 张玉铎. PVDF球形多孔材料的抑爆性能研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(1): 177-182.
[2]	王燕, 李忠, 张一民, 王阳, 杨晶晶, 纪文涛. 不同磷酸氢盐作用下的乙烯抑爆特性及机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 48-54.
[3]	景国勋, 贺祥, 郭绍帅, 朱斯佳. 封闭材料对分岔管道中瓦斯爆炸特性的影响^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(11): 64-70.
[4]	张玉涛, 张玉杰, 李亚清. 凹型结构建筑外立面火灾蔓延特性模拟研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 70-78.
[5]	于水军, 谢高超, 任茉, 杨岱霖. 硫氧镁水泥/聚苯乙烯复合材料燃烧性能研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(6): 31-36.
[6]	笪良军, 谢启源, 罗圣峰. 倾斜XPS板材向外多向耦合蔓延燃烧特性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 64-70.
[7]	朱云峰, 钱亚男, 徐伟, 蒋军成, 石宁, 王志荣. 硝酸-苯乙烯混合体系的热失控特性与机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 32-38.
[8]	殷鹰, 蓝朝逊, 李俊, 毛丹, 史君林. 埋地PE燃气管道地质沉降破坏数值分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(10): 18-23.
[9]	于水军, 魏月贝, 杨岱霖, 谢高超. 石膏基聚苯乙烯饰面防火板的阻燃性能研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(1): 31-36.
[10]	周立国, 姚安林, 徐涛龙, 周雪, 尚卯. 挖掘载荷下燃气PE管道损伤分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 59-64.
[11]	金满平, 朱云峰, 张婧, 孙峰, 徐伟, 石宁. 醋酸乙烯聚合体系热失控风险评估及失控抑制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 104-109.
[12]	田丰，倪艳荣，乔月纯，卢宇. 抗水树交联电缆运行安全性研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(5): 69-.
[13]	黄新杰，丁厚成，张浩，张英，孙金华. 海拔对聚苯乙烯火蔓延温度场特性影响的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(10): 36-.
[14]	张悦，景国勋，马树宝. 模糊事故树在分析氯乙烯单体槽爆炸风险中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(11): 89-.
[15]	宋文华，杨志舟，李小伟，佴士勇，袁斌. 可发性聚苯乙烯仓库消防安全评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2007, 17(7): 139-.